股东出资加速到期制度中的债权人保护问题研究
Research on Creditor Protection in the System of Accelerated Maturity of Shareholders’ Capital Contribution
摘要: 《公司法》第五十四条确立的股东出资义务加速到期制度,主要功能在于保护债权人的合法权益。该项制度既源于资本认缴制下股东期限利益的合理限制,也借鉴民法债权人代位权理论,通过突破债权相对性实现对债权人的直接救济。这一制度在具体司法实践中也存在一些缺陷,一是“公司不能清偿到期债务”的认定标准模糊,二是资金归属路径不明确,“入库规则”与“直接受偿”的分歧削弱了对债权人的保护力度。最后通过采用“主观不能清偿”标准以降低债权人举证成本,明确公司停止支付到期债务即可触发加速到期;确立债权人直接受偿规则,依托代位权法理简化债权实现路径,兼顾效率与公平,实现公司、股东与债权人之间的利益平衡。
Abstract: The main function of the accelerated maturity system for shareholders’ capital contribution obligations established in Article 54 of the Company Law is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of creditors. This system is derived from the reasonable limitation of shareholders’ term interests under the capital contribution system, and also draws on the theory of creditor’s subrogation in civil law to achieve direct relief to creditors by breaking through the relativity of creditor’s rights. This system also has some shortcomings in specific judicial practice. Firstly, the criteria for determining that a company cannot repay its due debts are vague. Secondly, the path of fund ownership is unclear, and the divergence between the “storage rules” and “direct repayment” weakens the protection of creditors. Finally, by adopting the “subjective inability to repay” standard to reduce the burden of proof for creditors, it is clarified that the company’s cessation of payment of due can trigger accelerated maturity; Establish rules for direct repayment of creditors, simplify the path of debt realization based on the principle of subrogation, balance efficiency and fairness, and achieve a dynamic balance of interests among the company, shareholders, and creditors.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
王长华. 股东出资义务加速到期的适用条件与法律效果[J]. 法商研究, 2025, 42(2): 171-186.
|
|
[2]
|
陈妮. 非破产下股东出资期限利益保护限度实证研究[J]. 法学评论, 2020, 38(6): 183-193.
|
|
[3]
|
徐强胜. 公司关系视角下认缴资本制的修正[J]. 法治研究, 2022(5): 60-72.
|
|
[4]
|
李建伟. 认缴制下股东出资责任加速到期研究[J]. 人民司法, 2015(9): 50-56.
|
|
[5]
|
刘铭卿. 股东出资义务加速到期研究[J]. 政治与法律, 2019(4): 153-161+152.
|
|
[6]
|
朱慈蕴. 股东出资义务的性质与公司资本制度完善[J]. 清华法学, 2022, 16(2): 75-92.
|
|
[7]
|
李建星. 法定加速到期的教义学构造[J]. 法商研究, 2019, 36(1): 105-117.
|
|
[8]
|
周游. 新公司法条文解读与适用指引: 案例·规则·文献[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2024: 119.
|
|
[9]
|
刘斌. 出资义务加速到期规则的解释论[J]. 财经法学, 2024(3): 114-128.
|
|
[10]
|
刘俊海. 论注册资本认缴制的兴利除弊: 兼论期限利益与交易安全的动态平衡[J]. 学术论坛, 2024, 47(1): 44-59.
|
|
[11]
|
陈希. 股东出资加速到期解释论之展开[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 65(2): 54-58+153.
|
|
[12]
|
马登科, 张翼. 未届期股东出资责任执行的构造解析[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2024, 26(5): 117-132.
|
|
[13]
|
宋宇. 新《公司法》“股东出资义务加速到期”的适用困境与优化路径[C]//司法问题研究2025年第一届“司法现代化”主题征文汇编(二). 2025: 384-399.
|
|
[14]
|
李建伟. 公司法评注[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2024: 231-235.
|
|
[15]
|
刘斌. 新公司法注释全书[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2024: 266-278.
|
|
[16]
|
崔建远. 论中国《民法典》上的债权人代位权[J]. 社会科学, 2020(11): 92-100.
|
|
[17]
|
许德风. 债务人的责任财产——债权人撤销权、代位权及公司债权人保护制度的共同基础[J]. 清华法学, 2024, 18(1): 25-42.
|