生成式AI与人工学术写作的情态对比研究
A Comparative Study of Modality in Generative AI and Human Academic Writing
摘要: 随着生成式人工智能(AI)在学术写作中的应用日益广泛,探讨其与人工写作的语言特征差异具有重要意义。本研究基于系统功能语言学的情态理论,以情态动词为切入点,对比分析AI (DeepSeek)与人工学术写作的情态表达差异。研究发现,人工写作在情态表达上更具灵活性,能够根据语境调整语气,而AI受训练的数据驱动模式,使其语言表达趋于保守,揭示了当前AI写作在学术严谨性与表达多样性上的局限性。
Abstract: With the increasingly widespread application of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing, exploring the differences in linguistic features between AI and human writing has become of significant importance. Drawing upon the theory of modality in Systemic Functional Linguistics, this study focuses on modal verbs to comparatively analyze the differences in modal expressions between AI (specifically DeepSeek) and human academic writing. The findings indicate that human writing exhibits greater flexibility in modal expression, allowing authors to adjust their tone according to the specific context. In contrast, AI writing, constrained by its data-driven training patterns, tends to be more conservative in its linguistic choices. This contrast reveals the limitations of current AI writing in terms of both academic rigor and expressive diversity.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
夏雪. 基于语料库的学习者学术英语写作情态动词使用特征研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 新乡: 河南师范大学, 2017.
|
|
[2]
|
李杰, 钟永平. 论英语的情态系统及其功能[J]. 外语教学, 2002(1): 9-15.
|
|
[3]
|
张德禄. 系统功能语言学的新发展[J]. 当代语言学, 2004(1): 57-65+94.
|
|
[4]
|
徐玉臣, 张惠玲. 情态研究回顾与展望[J]. 外语教学, 2023, 44(5): 26-34.
|
|
[5]
|
魏本力. 情态动词的量值取向[J]. 外语学刊, 2005(4): 56-59+112.
|
|
[6]
|
闫鹏飞. 英文研究论文摘要特征学科差异的多维分析[J]. 外语学刊, 2025(2): 43-53.
|
|
[7]
|
雷蕾. 中国英语学习者学术写作句法复杂度研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2017, 40(5): 1-10+159.
|
|
[8]
|
李战子. 从语气、情态到评价[J]. 外语研究, 2005(6): 14-19+80.
|
|
[9]
|
杨曙, 常晨光. 系统功能语言学视角下英汉情态类型系统对比研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2021, 44(4): 1-9+159.
|
|
[10]
|
王永亮, 王成昊. 生成式人工智能赋能中国英语专业学生科研素养培育——以“研究方法与学术写作”课程为例[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2026(1): 53-65+93+147.
|