CEA框架下朱、梁译本《罗密欧与朱丽叶》对比赏析
A Comparative Study and Appreciation of Zhu Shenghao’s and Liang Shiqiu’s Translations of Romeo and Juliet under the CEA Framework
摘要: 朱生豪与梁实秋是我国莎剧翻译领域极具代表性的翻译家,二者译本流传广泛、影响深远,为莎士比亚戏剧在中国的传播与接受奠定了重要基础。基于文学观念、翻译目标与受众定位的差异,两位译者形成了截然不同的翻译取向。本文依托李长栓提出的CEA框架,以《罗密欧与朱丽叶》为研究文本,从理解、表达、变通三个维度对比赏析朱、梁译本的语言特征与翻译实践,探究二者在审美传递、文本还原、文化适配层面的策略差异,剖析戏剧翻译中翻译取向的动态调适逻辑,并汲取戏剧翻译的恰当方法。
Abstract: Zhu Shenghao and Liang Shiqiu are two representative translators of Shakespearean plays in China. Their widely circulated translations have exerted far-reaching influence and laid a solid foundation for the spread and reception of Shakespeare’s dramas in China. Due to differences in literary concepts, translation purposes and target-audience positioning, the two translators have developed distinct translation orientations. Based on the CEA framework proposed by Li Changshuan, this paper takes Romeo and Juliet as the research text. It compares and analyzes the linguistic features and translation practices of Zhu’s and Liang’s translations from three dimensions of comprehension, expression and adaptation, explores their strategic differences in aesthetic transmission, text restoration and cultural adaptation, analyzes the dynamic adjustment logic of translation orientations in drama translation, and summarizes appropriate approaches for drama translation.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
李长栓. 非文学翻译理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中译出版社, 2020.
|
|
[2]
|
李长栓. 如何撰写翻译实践报告: CEA框架、范文及点评[M]. 北京: 中译出版社, 2021.
|
|
[3]
|
朱生豪. 莎士比亚戏剧全集[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 1978.
|
|
[4]
|
朱安博. 朱生豪翻译的“神韵说”与中国古代诗学[J]. 江南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2013, 12(4): 118-123.
|
|
[5]
|
梁实秋. 莎士比亚全集[M]. 北京: 中国广播电视出版社, 1995.
|
|
[6]
|
孙会军, 刘文杰. 莎剧汉语译本原作风格再现的多维考察——以《李尔王》和《温莎的风流娘儿们》为例[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2023, 46(6): 45-51.
|