《黄帝内经》英译本的海外接受度研究——基于网络大众书评的实证分析
A Study on the Overseas Reception of English Translations of Huangdi Neijing—An Empirical Analysis Based on Online Popular Book Reviews
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.147732, PDF,   
作者: 黄 硕*, 姚云龙:北京中医药大学中医学院,北京;北京中医药大学王琦书院、国家中医体质与治未病研究院,北京;郑燕飞:北京中医药大学王琦书院、国家中医体质与治未病研究院,北京;周开林#:北京中医药大学人文学院,北京
关键词: 《黄帝内经》典籍英译传播用户生成内容大众书评Huangdi Neijing Translation and Dissemination of Medical Classics User-Generated Content Popular Book Reviews
摘要: 中医典籍的英译与国际传播已成为中医药跨文化传播研究的重要议题。《黄帝内经》作为中医理论体系的奠基之作,其英译本的海外接受状况尤具代表性与研究价值。本文运用系统内容分析法,梳理了《黄帝内经》代表性英译本的读者反馈情况,并对来自亚马逊与好读网的208条大众书评进行对比分析,考察《黄帝内经》代表性英译本的海外接受情况。研究围绕译本准确性、文化适应性与可读性三个维度,探讨了影响《黄帝内经》英译本海外接受度的关键因素,并提出了相应的译介优化与传播策略。研究发现普通读者更关注《黄帝内经》的实用价值以及里面蕴含的中医文化;部分英译本难以保持原文严谨的同时兼顾语言流畅,在平衡准确性与可读性之间仍存在矛盾;研究表明,提升《黄帝内经》英译本海外接受度,应进一步优化译本质量,尤其注重准确传达原典内涵与提升目标语读者阅读体验,并在保留中医文化特质的基础上适度采用深度翻译策略。本研究可为中医典籍英译的对外译介与跨文化传播提供基于读者实际反馈的实证依据。
Abstract: The English translations and international dissemination of traditional Chinese medical classics have become important topics in the study of cross-cultural communication of Chinese medicine. As the foundational work of the theoretical system of traditional Chinese medicine, Huangdi Neijing is particularly representative and valuable for research in terms of the overseas reception of its English translations. Using systematic content analysis, this study reviews reader feedback on representative English translations of Huangdi Neijing and conducts a comparative analysis of 211 general reader reviews from Amazon and Goodreads, thereby examining the overseas reception of representative English translations of the text. The study focuses on three dimensions—translation accuracy, cultural adaptability, and readability—to explore the key factors affecting the overseas acceptance of English translations of the Huangdi Neijing, and offers recommendations for improving translation and dissemination strategies. Research has found that general readers are more interested in the practical value of the Huangdi Neijing’s Inner Classic and the traditional Chinese medicine culture it contains; some existing English translations struggle to maintain the original text’s rigor while also achieving fluent language, and tensions remain between accuracy and readability. The study suggests that improving the overseas reception of English translations of Huangdi Neijing requires further enhancement of translation quality, with particular emphasis on accurately conveying the connotations of the original classic and improving the reading experience of target-language readers. Meanwhile, deep translation strategies should be adopted appropriately on the basis of preserving the cultural characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine. This research provides empirical evidence based on reader feedback for the translation and cross-cultural dissemination of Chinese medical classics.
文章引用:黄硕, 郑燕飞, 姚云龙, 周开林. 《黄帝内经》英译本的海外接受度研究——基于网络大众书评的实证分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(7): 1006-1013. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.147732

参考文献

[1] 王吉民, 傅维康. 中国医史外文文献索引: 1682-1965 [M]. 上海: 上海中医学院医史馆, 1966.
[2] 谢文鑫, 吴青. 《黄帝内经》英译本译介效果及影响因素研究[J]. 中医药导报, 2021, 27(3): 223-228.
[3] 郑金生. 德国文树德教授主持的《黄帝内经素问》译注系列著作完璧问世[J]. 中华医史杂志, 2011, 41(5): 310.
[4] 陈岷婕, 黄嘉陵, 肖忠琼. 从《黄帝内经》英文版窥探中医翻译的现状[J]. 辽宁中医药大学学报, 2009, 11(5): 237-239.
[5] 马凯, 赵润生, 师旭亮. “厚译法”在文树德《内经》译本中的应用研究[J]. 中医药导报, 2020, 26(9): 211-213.
[6] 王银泉. 法国汉学家、加拿大裔美国生理学家与《黄帝内经》首部英译本[J]. 中医药文化, 2023, 18(2): 105-126.
[7] 蒋辰雪. 文树德《黄帝内经》英译本的“深度翻译”探究[J]. 中国翻译, 2019, 40(5): 112-120+190.
[8] 卢德超, 曲悃, 陈战. 基于语料库的《黄帝内经素问》威斯译本中“气”的译法研究[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2024, 30(8): 1399-1403.
[9] 周冬梅. 顺应论视阈下的《黄帝内经》中医文化负载词的翻译[J]. 浙江中医药大学学报, 2012, 36(10): 1139-1141.
[10] 张卓文, 严利依. 《黄帝内经素问直解》与《黄帝内经素问注证发微》9篇篇名诠释特点之比较[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2017, 32(12): 5362-5365.
[11] 马凯, 陈文康, 于贺畑, 等. 海外中医汉学家文树德《黄帝内经》译著系列翻译特色探究[J]. 环球中医药, 2020, 13(5): 862-864.
[12] 雷佳豪, 赵自强. 《黄帝内经·素问》文树德译本“道”系词语的厚译研究[J]. 环球中医药, 2023, 16(12): 2497-2501.
[13] 王仁平, 张庆祥. 《黄帝内经》中“伏梁”病证探析[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2020, 43(7): 557-560.
[14] 臧敏, 包素珍. 《黄帝内经》荣气与营气辨析[J]. 浙江中医杂志, 2019, 54(4): 252-253.
[15] 张光婷, 李晓红. 语料库视角下中医术语英译标准化研究——以《黄帝内经·素问》“络”的英译为例[J]. 品位·经典, 2025(15): 25-27.
[16] 刘为雯, 安玥, 陈卓霖, 等. 《黄帝内经·素问》所载术语“络”的英译研究[J]. 中医药导报, 2024, 30(8): 195-200.