肾脏乏脂肪血管平滑肌脂肪瘤与肾细胞癌的影像学鉴别诊断进展
Research Progress in Imaging Differential Diagnosis of Fat-Poor Renal Angiomyolipoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1672754, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张茜茜, 马盼盼, 商 静, 穆 靓, 彭建美*:陕西省人民医院超声科,陕西 西安;陈怡萱:延安大学延安医学院,陕西 延安
关键词: 乏脂肪肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤肾细胞癌影像学鉴别诊断Fat-Poor Renal Angiomyolipoma Renal Cell Carcinoma Imaging Differential Diagnosis
摘要: 随着影像检查技术的普及,肾脏肿瘤检出率显著增高,其中乏脂肪肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(renal angiomyolipoma, fpRAML)与肾细胞癌(Renal cell carcinoma, RCC)影像表现重叠度高,术前鉴别难度大。常规影像学检查及穿刺活检存在诊断效能有限、取样不足、亚型鉴别困难、存在并发症等缺陷,致使部分良性fpRAML患者接受不必要的手术治疗。为进一步明确两类肿瘤的无创鉴别诊断方法、优化临床诊疗策略,本文系统梳理国内外相关研究进展,围绕CT、MRI、超声影像学技术,结合血清学指标及临床基线特征,总结各类检查手段在fpRAML与RCC鉴别诊断中的应用价值与局限性。现有研究显示,CT可通过病灶形态征象、定量参数、血管分布模式、纹理分析、动态强化特征等初步鉴别;MRI凭借化学位移成像、信号衰减特征及动态强化参数,在鉴别fpRAML与RCC方面有一定的价值;超声及超声造影凭借便捷、无创优势适用于临床初筛,病灶特征性高回声征、超声造影特征具备良好鉴别价值。与此同时,基于影像组学与深度学习的人工智能分析技术也为无创诊断提供了新路径,但仍存在模型泛化能力不足等现实局限。单一影像学技术存在固有局限,而融合影像学定量指标、血清碱性磷酸酶水平及性别、年龄等临床特征的多维度联合诊断模型,可显著提升鉴别诊断准确率,临床应用前景显著。
Abstract: With the popularization of imaging techniques, the detection rate of renal tumors has increased markedly. Fat-poor renal angiomyolipoma (fpRAML) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) exhibit highly overlapping imaging features, resulting in great difficulties in preoperative differential diagnosis. Conventional imaging examinations and percutaneous biopsy are limited by insufficient diagnostic efficiency, inadequate sampling of small lesions, difficulty in distinguishing tumor subtypes, and potential complications, which may lead to unnecessary surgical resection in patients with benign fpRAML. To further explore noninvasive differential diagnostic approaches and optimize clinical management strategies, this article systematically reviews recent domestic and international research progress. We summarize the application value and limitations of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, as well as serological biomarkers and clinical baseline features in differentiating fpRAML from RCC. Current studies have demonstrated that CT can provide preliminary differential diagnosis based on lesion morphological signs, quantitative parameters, vascular distribution patterns, texture features, and dynamic enhancement characteristics. MRI, characterized by chemical shift imaging, signal attenuation manifestations and dynamic enhancement parameters, has favorable value for distinguishing fpRAML from RCC. Conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound are suitable for preliminary clinical screening due to their convenience and noninvasiveness, and characteristic hyperechoic signs and contrast-enhanced patterns show good differential efficacy. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence analytical techniques based on radiomics and deep learning have offered new avenues for noninvasive diagnosis, yet they still suffer from practical limitations such as insufficient model generalization ability. Single imaging modality has inherent diagnostic limitations. In contrast, the multidimensional combined model that integrates quantitative imaging parameters, serum alkaline phosphatase levels, and clinical indicators including gender and age can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy, holding great promise for prospective clinical application.
文章引用:张茜茜, 马盼盼, 商静, 陈怡萱, 穆靓, 彭建美. 肾脏乏脂肪血管平滑肌脂肪瘤与肾细胞癌的影像学鉴别诊断进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(7): 2244-2253. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1672754

参考文献

[1] Sasaguri, K. and Takahashi, N. (2018) CT and MR Imaging for Solid Renal Mass Characterization. European Journal of Radiology, 99, 40-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.12.008
[2] van Oostenbrugge, T.J., Fütterer, J.J. and Mulders, P.F.A. (2018) Diagnostic Imaging for Solid Renal Tumors: A Pictorial Review. Kidney Cancer, 2, 79-93.
https://doi.org/10.3233/kca-180028
[3] Richard, P.O., Jewett, M.A.S., Bhatt, J.R., Kachura, J.R., Evans, A.J., Zlotta, A.R., et al. (2015) Renal Tumor Biopsy for Small Renal Masses: A Single-Center 13-Year Experience. European Urology, 68, 1007-1013.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.004
[4] Atri, M., Tabatabaeifar, L., Jang, H., Finelli, A., Moshonov, H. and Jewett, M. (2015) Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced US for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses. Radiology, 276, 900-908.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015140907
[5] Zhang, J., Lefkowitz, R.A., Ishill, N.M., Wang, L., Moskowitz, C.S., Russo, P., et al. (2007) Solid Renal Cortical Tumors: Differentiation with Ct. Radiology, 244, 494-504.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2442060927
[6] Strother, M., Uzzo, R.N., Handorf, E. and Uzzo, R.G. (2023) Distinguishing Lipid-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Carcinoma Using Tumor Shape. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 41, 208.e9-208.e14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.01.008
[7] Varghese, B.A., Chen, F., Hwang, D.H., Cen, S.Y., Gill, I.S. and Duddalwar, V.A. (2018) Differentiating Solid, Non-Macroscopic Fat Containing, Enhancing Renal Masses Using Fast Fourier Transform Analysis of Multiphase CT. The British Journal of Radiology, 91, Article 20170789.
https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170789
[8] Yang, C.W., Shen, S.H., Chang, Y.H., Chung, H., Wang, J., Lin, A.T., et al. (2013) Are There Useful CT Features to Differentiate Renal Cell Carcinoma from Lipid-Poor Renal Angiomyolipoma? American Journal of Roentgenology, 201, 1017-1028.
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.12.10204
[9] Schieda, N., Hodgdon, T., El-Khodary, M., Flood, T.A. and McInnes, M.D.F. (2014) Unenhanced CT for the Diagnosis of Minimal-Fat Renal Angiomyolipoma. American Journal of Roentgenology, 203, 1236-1241.
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.12630
[10] Ogawa, Y., Morita, S., Takagi, T., Yoshida, K., Tanabe, K., Nagashima, Y., et al. (2021) Early Dark Cortical Band Sign on CT for Differentiating Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma from Fat Poor Angiomyolipoma and Detecting Peritumoral Pseudocapsule. European Radiology, 31, 5990-5997.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07717-z
[11] Kim, Y.H., Han, K., Oh, Y.T., Jung, D.C., Cho, N.H. and Park, S.Y. (2017) Morphologic Analysis with Computed Tomography May Help Differentiate Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study with 602 Patients. Abdominal Radiology, 43, 647-654.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1244-y
[12] Kang, H.S. and Park, J.J. (2021) Circularity Index on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Helps Distinguish Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Analyses of Histologically Proven 257 Small Renal Tumors Less than 4 Cm. Korean Journal of Radiology, 22, 735-741.
https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0865
[13] Song, X., Zhang, W., Li, X., Sun, D., Zhang, Q., Ma, H., et al. (2025) Usefulness of the Internal-to-External Circle Area Ratio in Contrast-Enhanced CT to Differentiate Small (< 3 Cm) Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma. BMC Medical Imaging, 25, Article No. 236.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01758-2
[14] Bagheri, S.M., Khajehasani, F., Fatemi, I. and Ayoubpour, M.R. (2017) Tumoral Vascular Pattern in Renal Cell Carcinoma and Fat-Poor Renal Angiomyolipoma as a Novel Helpful Differentiating Factor on Contrast-Enhanced CT Scan. Tumor Biology, 39, Article 101042831773314.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1010428317733144
[15] Yanagi, M., Kiriyama, T., Akatsuka, J., Endo, Y., Takeda, H., Katsu, A., et al. (2022) Differential Diagnosis and Prognosis of Small Renal Masses: Association with Collateral Vessels Detected Using Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography. BMC Cancer, 22, Article No. 856.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09971-w
[16] Hodgdon, T., McInnes, M.D.F., Schieda, N., Flood, T.A., Lamb, L. and Thornhill, R.E. (2015) Can Quantitative CT Texture Analysis Be Used to Differentiate Fat-Poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma on Unenhanced CT Images? Radiology, 276, 787-796.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142215
[17] You, M.-., Kim, N. and Choi, H.J. (2019) The Value of Quantitative CT Texture Analysis in Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma on Four-Phase Contrast-Enhanced CT Images. Clinical Radiology, 74, 547-554.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.018
[18] Hakim, S.W., Schieda, N., Hodgdon, T., McInnes, M.D.F., Dilauro, M. and Flood, T.A. (2016) Angiomyolipoma (AML) without Visible Fat: Ultrasound, CT and MR Imaging Features with Pathological Correlation. European Radiology, 26, 592-600.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3851-8
[19] Hindman, N., Ngo, L., Genega, E.M., Melamed, J., Wei, J., Braza, J.M., et al. (2012) Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Can It Be Differentiated from Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Using Standard MR Techniques? Radiology, 265, 468-477.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112087
[20] Campbell, N., Rosenkrantz, A.B. and Pedrosa, I. (2014) MRI Phenotype in Renal Cancer. Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 23, 95-115.
https://doi.org/10.1097/rmr.0000000000000019
[21] Sasiwimonphan, K., Takahashi, N., Leibovich, B.C., Carter, R.E., Atwell, T.D. and Kawashima, A. (2012) Small (< 4 Cm) Renal Mass: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat from Renal Cell Carcinoma Utilizing MR Imaging. Radiology, 263, 160-168.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12111205
[22] Schieda, N., Dilauro, M., Moosavi, B., Hodgdon, T., Cron, G.O., McInnes, M.D.F., et al. (2016) MRI Evaluation of Small (< 4 Cm) Solid Renal Masses: Multivariate Modeling Improves Diagnostic Accuracy for Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat Compared to Univariate Analysis. European Radiology, 26, 2242-2251.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4039-y
[23] Childs, D.D., Clingan, M.J., Zagoria, R.J., Sirintrapun, J., Tangtiang, K., Anderson, A., et al. (2014) In-Phase Signal Intensity Loss in Solid Renal Masses on Dual-Echo Gradient-Echo MRI: Association with Malignancy and Pathologic Classification. American Journal of Roentgenology, 203, W421-W428.
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.13.11113
[24] Murray, C.A., Quon, M., McInnes, M.D.F., van der Pol, C.B., Hakim, S.W., Flood, T.A., et al. (2016) Evaluation of T1-Weighted MRI to Detect Intratumoral Hemorrhage within Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma as a Feature Differentiating from Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat. American Journal of Roentgenology, 207, 585-591.
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.16.16062
[25] Kim, J.K., Park, S., Shon, J. and Cho, K. (2004) Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat: Differentiation from Renal Cell Carcinoma at Biphasic Helical CT. Radiology, 230, 677-684.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2303030003
[26] Scialpi, M., Di Maggio, A., Midiri, M., Loperfido, A., Angelelli, G. and Rotondo, A. (2000) Small Renal Masses: Assessment of Lesion Characterization and Vascularity on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging with Fat Suppression. American Journal of Roentgenology, 175, 751-757.
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750751
[27] Liang, X., Zeng, X., Hong, Z., Su, M., Yang, J.C. and Wu, S.S (2024) Determinants of Conventional and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Diagnosis of Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma < 5 Cm. Frontiers in Oncology, 14, Article ID: 1446801.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1446801
[28] Jiang, J., Chen, Y., Zhou, Y. and Zhang, H. (2010) Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Features Relation to Tumor Size. European Journal of Radiology, 73, 162-167.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.09.030
[29] Kazmierski, B., Deurdulian, C., Tchelepi, H. and Grant, E.G. (2018) Applications of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Kidney. Abdominal Radiology, 43, 880-898.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1307-0
[30] Li, C., Lu, Q., Huang, B., Xue, L., Yan, L., Zheng, F., et al. (2016) Quantitative Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Differentiation of Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes and Angiomyolipoma. European Journal of Radiology, 85, 795-802.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.009
[31] Zaher, D.M., El‐Gamal, M.I., Omar, H.A., Aljareh, S.N., Al‐Shamma, S.A., Ali, A.J., et al. (2020) Recent Advances with Alkaline Phosphatase Isoenzymes and Their Inhibitors. Archiv der Pharmazie, 353, e2000011.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.202000011
[32] Chen, X., Lan, M., Zhou, Y., Chen, W., Hu, D., Liu, J., et al. (2017) Risk Factors for Bone Metastasis from Renal Cell Cancer. Journal of Bone Oncology, 9, 29-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2017.10.004
[33] Peng, T., Fan, J., Xie, B., Wang, Q., Chen, Y., Li, Y., et al. (2023) Alkaline Phosphatase Combines with CT Factors for Differentiating Small (≤  4 Cm) Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multiple Quantitative Tool. World Journal of Urology, 41, 1345-1351.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04367-2
[34] Nam, H.K., Sharma, M., Liu, J. and Hatch, N.E. (2017) Tissue Nonspecific Alkaline Phosphatase (TNAP) Regulates Cranial Base Growth and Synchondrosis Maturation. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, Article ID: 161.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00161
[35] Choueiri, T.K. and Kaelin, W.G. (2020) Targeting the HIF2-VEGF Axis in Renal Cell Carcinoma. Nature Medicine, 26, 1519-1530.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1093-z
[36] Liu, Y., Lv, H., Li, X., Liu, J., Chen, S., Chen, Y., et al. (2021) Cyclovirobuxine Inhibits the Progression of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma by Suppressing the IGFBP3-AKT/STAT3/MAPK-Snail Signalling Pathway. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 17, 3522-3537.
https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.62114
[37] Feng, S., Gong, M., Zhou, D., Yuan, R., Kong, J., Jiang, F., et al. (2023) A CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Small Renal Masses (≤ 4 Cm). Translational Oncology, 29, Article 101627.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101627
[38] Li, C., Qiao, G., Li, J., Qi, L., Wei, X., Zhang, T., et al. (2022) An Ultrasonic-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Distinguishing between Benign and Malignant Solid Renal Masses. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, Article ID: 847805.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.847805
[39] Yang, R., Wu, J., Sun, L., Lai, S., Xu, Y., Liu, X., et al. (2019) Radiomics of Small Renal Masses on Multiphasic CT: Accuracy of Machine Learning-Based Classification Models for the Differentiation of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Angiomyolipoma without Visible Fat. European Radiology, 30, 1254-1263.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06384-5
[40] Yao, H., Tian, L., Liu, X., Li, S., Chen, Y., Cao, J., et al. (2023) Development and External Validation of the Multichannel Deep Learning Model Based on Unenhanced CT for Differentiating Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Two-Center Retrospective Study. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 149, 15827-15838.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05339-0
[41] Jian, L., Liu, Y., Xie, Y., Jiang, S., Ye, M. and Lin, H. (2022) MRI-Based Radiomics and Urine Creatinine for the Differentiation of Renal Angiomyolipoma with Minimal Fat from Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, Article ID: 876664.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.876664
[42] Zhang, L., Sun, K., Shi, L., Qiu, J., Wang, X. and Wang, S. (2023) Ultrasound Image-Based Deep Features and Radiomics for the Discrimination of Small Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma and Small Renal Cell Carcinoma. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 49, 560-568.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.10.009