《电路原理》混合式课程建设中“前置干预”教学策略的探索与实践
Exploration and Practice of Pre-Intervention Teaching Strategy in the Construction of Hybrid Course of “Circuit Principles”
摘要: 针对《电路原理》课程教学中“先修基础参差不齐”与“实验准备不足”两大隐性痛点,文章提出“前置干预”教学策略,将教学干预的关口从课中提前至理论课程和实验课程开课前:首先,建立“先修知识诊断–定向衔接”机制,通过课前线上诊断,定位学生在先修课程中的薄弱环节,推送针对性衔接微课;其次,建立“实验预检–分级准入”机制,在每个实验课程前设置能力预检任务,为学生实施分级准入。将两个前移的关口与课中混合式教学、课后过程性评价相融合,形成“诊断–衔接–教学–预检–实验–评价”六环节教学体系,从而改善整体教学质量。教学实践表明,该策略有效平衡了学生的学习起点差异,降低了实验环节的操作失误,取得了良好的教学效果。
Abstract: Addressing two major hidden pain points in the teaching of “Circuit Principles”-“uneven prior knowledge” and “insufficient experimental preparation”-this article proposes a “Pre-intervention” teaching strategy. This strategy moves the intervention point from in-class to before the start of theoretical and experimental courses: First, it establishes a “prerequisite knowledge diagnosis-targeted bridging” mechanism. Through online pre-class diagnosis, it identifies students’ weaknesses in prerequisite courses and provides targeted bridging micro-lessons. Second, it establishes an “experiment pre-assessment-tiered admission” mechanism. It sets pre-assessment tasks before each experimental course to implement tiered admission for students. These two forward-moving gates are integrated with blended learning during class and post-class formative assessment to form a six-stage teaching system: “diagnosis-bridging-teaching-pre-assessment-experiment-evaluation,” thereby improving overall teaching quality. Teaching practice shows that this strategy effectively balances differences in students’ learning starting points, reduces operational errors in experimental procedures, and achieves good teaching results.
文章引用:查晓婧, 刘川, 李正. 《电路原理》混合式课程建设中“前置干预”教学策略的探索与实践[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(7): 511-517. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.147543

参考文献

[1] 瞿博阳, 柴旭朝, 马彦霞, 等. 基于一流本科课程建设的电路原理教学探索与实践[J]. 中国教育技术装备, 2021(24): 90-91+98.
[2] 邱关源. 电路[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 568.
[3] 霍炬, 李琰, 杨旭强. “双一流”背景下的“电路”课程建设探索[J]. 电气电子教学学报, 2024, 46(1): 49-53.
[4] 覃贵芳, 黄岳龙, 李勤生, 等. “模拟电子技术”课程建设路径研究[J]. 装备制造技术, 2023(7): 136-139.
[5] 曾宇露, 刘嘉, 章彧, 等. “金课”背景下《电路》课程建设实践与探索[J]. 江西科学, 2024, 42(4): 893-896+905.
[6] 艾散江·麦提喀斯木. 大数据驱动下的高校学生思政素养精准教育模式研究[J]. 教师, 2025(13): 5-7.
[7] Block, J.H. and Burns, R.B. (1976) Mastery Learning. Review of Research in Education, 4, 3-49.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1167112
[8] Killi, S. and Morrison, A. (2015) Just-in-Time Teaching, Just-in-Need Learning: Designing Towards Optimized Pedagogical Outcomes. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3, 742-750.
https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.031013
[9] 吴飞青. 新工科视域下电路原理教学改革与实践[J]. 教育研究前沿(中英文版), 2025, 15(3): 1-5.
[10] 高国琴, 李长杰, 方志明, 等. 一流专业建设背景下课程教学改革探索——以电类专业基础“金三角”课程为例[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2022(30): 55-58.
[11] 王乐, 刘晓伟, 孙文洋. 新工科背景下“模拟电子技术”课程线上线下混合式教学研究[J]. 科技风, 2023(25): 155-157.
[12] 王丹妮, 张向东, 李月姝, 等. BOPPPS混合式教学在公路设计技术课程教学方案的设计探究——以“平曲线超高设计”为例[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2023, 44(22): 260-262.
[13] 陈绳得. 基于Multisim仿真的组合逻辑电路实验教学设计与研究——以“三人表决电路”为例[J]. 信息技术与信息化, 2021(3): 199-201.
[14] 冼进, 赖晓铮. 基于Multisim仿真数字逻辑实验教学改革[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2019, 38(9): 228-232.
[15] 刘亮, 苏钢, 谭志光, 等. 精准教学在电路原理实验课程中的应用[J]. 大学教育, 2024(19): 49-53.