班主任在家校共育中“严管”与“厚爱”的平衡策略
Balance Strategies of “Strict Management” and “Sincere Care” for Class Teacher in Home-School Co-Education
摘要: 家校共育中“严管”与“厚爱”的尺度把握,是班主任协同育人工作的核心难题。基于120份班主任问卷与450份家长问卷的调查发现,仅15%的班主任能稳定平衡二者尺度,78%的教师因投诉风险而不敢严管,62%受家庭溺爱观念制约;家校教育标准相悖者逾80%,协同效能严重削弱。为解释这一失衡的内在机理,整合教养方式理论、自我决定理论与生态系统理论,建构“价值基准–机制解释–条件保障”三维分析框架,即教养方式理论确立高要求与高反应并存的价值基准,自我决定理论揭示严管与厚爱分别回应胜任需要与自主、归属需要的内在机制,生态系统理论指明家校中间系统协调性建设是实现平衡的场域条件。基于此框架,系统分析家校理念分歧、沟通障碍与机制缺失三重成因,提出目标一致性、尺度适配性、沟通共情性与协同一致性四项原则及实践策略,并从学校制度供给、班主任能力提升与家长素养优化三个层面构建保障机制。
Abstract: The balance between strict supervision and nurturing care in home-school collaboration remains the core challenge for homeroom teachers in educational coordination. A survey of 120 teacher questionnaires and 450 parent questionnaires revealed that only 15% of teachers consistently maintain this equilibrium; 78% avoid strict management due to potential complaints, while 62% are constrained by family-oriented parenting philosophies. Over 80% of cases exhibit conflicting educational standards between homes and schools, significantly undermining collaborative effectiveness. To explain this imbalance, we integrate parenting theory, self-determination theory, and ecosystem theory to develop a three-dimensional analytical framework: “value benchmarks - mechanism explanations - contextual safeguards”. Parenting theory establishes value benchmarks combining high expectations with strong responsiveness; self-determination theory reveals how strict supervision addresses competence needs while nurturing care addresses autonomy and belonging needs; ecosystem theory identifies systemic coordination between home and school as essential for achieving balance. Building on this framework, we systematically analyze three root causes—philosophical discrepancies, communication barriers, and institutional deficiencies, and propose four principles (goal alignment, scale compatibility, communicative empathy, and collaborative consistency) along with practical strategies. Additionally, we establish safeguard mechanisms across three dimensions: institutional policy development, teacher competency enhancement, and parental literacy improvement.
文章引用:武奕锦, 杨进霞. 班主任在家校共育中“严管”与“厚爱”的平衡策略[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(7): 1695-1705. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1671549

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于印发《中小学德育工作指南》的通知[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3325/201709/t20170904_313128.html, 2017-08-17.
[2] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国家庭教育促进法[EB/OL].
http://www.npc.gov.cn/c2/c30834/202110/t20211023_314286.html, 2021-10-23.
[3] 教育部等十三部门. 教育部等十三部门关于健全学校家庭社会协同育人机制的意见[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3325/202301/t20230119_1039746.html, 2023-01-19.
[4] Baumrind, D. (1971) Current Patterns of Parental Authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1-103.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030372
[5] Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (2000) The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
[6] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.
[7] 徐慧瑶. 维护学校正常教学管理秩序典型案例发布, 老师正常管教学生不担责[EB/OL].
http://bj.news.cn/20241226/23f945a6080547b48ac0075c994a376c/c.html, 2024-12-26.
[8] 谢其利. 班级人际关系与学生外化问题行为: 班主任管理行为的作用及干预[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2021.
[9] 钟明秀, 杨齐心. 严管厚爱办有爱的教育[N]. 法制生活报, 2023-06-01(001).
[10] 方芳. 规范实施教育惩戒合力提升育人效果[J]. 家长, 2026(7): 14-15.
[11] 于海燕. 家校共育视角下班主任管理工作的优化策略刍论[J]. 成才之路, 2026(12): 57-60.
[12] 于政玲. 家校共育, 从“心”开始[J]. 新校园, 2026(2): 103-104.