成都双流机场两次辐射雾发展过程对比分析
Comparative Analysis of Two Evolution Processes of Radiation Fog at Chengdu Shuangliu International Airport
摘要: 利用成都双流机场自动观测系统资料,对2023年1月5日和3月3日两次辐射雾过程进行对比分析。两次过程环流背景相似,均为高空槽快速东移后夜间转晴、辐射降温导致地面饱和,但两条跑道端(02L、02R)能见度差异显著:1月5日两端均出现浓雾,最低能见度150 m;3月3日仅02R端起雾,02L端能见度维持在1000 m以上。结果表明,起雾端气温稳步下降、相对湿度波动上升至97%以上,未起雾端气温下降缓慢;起雾端风速较小(1.0 m/s以下)、水平湍流动能较低(0.2 m
2/s
2以下),但湍流强度偏大,未起雾端风速偏大(最大2.1 m/s)、水平湍流动能较高(达0.6 m
2/s
2)而湍流强度偏小。利用机场地面风资料计算的湍流动能和湍流强度对辐射雾临近预报具有一定参考价值。
Abstract: Based on automatic observation data of Chengdu Shuangliu International Airport, compare two radiation fog events on January 5 and March 3, 2023. Both events occurred under similar circulation conditions: clear nights after the rapid eastward shift of upper-level troughs, where radiative cooling led to surface air saturation. However, visibility varied significantly between the 02L and 02R runway thresholds. Dense fog affected both runways on January 5, with a minimum visibility of 150 m, while fog only occurred at the 02R threshold on March 3, and the visibility at the 02L threshold remained above 1000 m. The results show that fog-prone areas experienced steady temperature drops and fluctuating relative humidity rising above 97%, whereas temperature decreased slowly in fog-free areas. At foggy runway ends, the wind speed was below 1.0 m/s and horizontal turbulent kinetic energy was less than 0.2 m2/s2, with relatively high turbulence intensity. In contrast, fog-free runway ends had a maximum wind speed of 2.1 m/s and higher horizontal turbulent kinetic energy up to 0.6 m2/s2, but lower turbulence intensity. Turbulent kinetic energy and turbulence intensity calculated from airport surface wind data can provide references for the nowcasting of radiation fog.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
伍一, 赵瑞达, 胡壮. 成都机场2019-2020年初辐射雾过程中微波辐射计应用[J]. 高原山地气象研究, 2020, 40(4): 77-81.
|
|
[2]
|
Gultepe, I., Tardif, R., Michaelides, S.C., Cermak, J., Bott, A., Bendix, J., et al. (2007) Fog Research: A Review of Past Achievements and Future Perspectives. In: Gultepe, I., et al., Eds., Fog and Boundary Layer Clouds: Fog Visibility and Forecasting, Birkhäuser, 1121-1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8419-7_3
|
|
[3]
|
Price, J., Porson, A. and Lock, A. (2015) An Observational Case Study of Persistent Fog and Comparison with an Ensemble Forecast Model. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 155, 301-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9995-2
|
|
[4]
|
李子华, 黄建平, 孙博阳, 等. 辐射雾发展的爆发性特征[J]. 大气科学, 1999, 23(5): 623-629.
|
|
[5]
|
刘晓舟. 南京冬季雾特征及湍流对雾过程的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2013.
|
|
[6]
|
吴妮晏, 赵清越. 天府与双流机场2022年1月9日辐射雾特征对比分析[J]. 高原山地气象研究, 2024, 44(4): 135-141.
|
|
[7]
|
袁艺, 赵瑞达, 邹永成. 双流机场辐射雾背景场特征及其典型个例分析[J]. 科技与创新, 2021(7): 21-24.
|
|
[8]
|
刘熙明, 胡非, 邹海波, 等. 北京地区一次典型大雾天气过程的边界层特征分析[J]. 高原气象, 2010, 29(5): 1174-1182.
|