文化赋能社区韧性治理的实现机制与优化路径
The Realization Mechanisms and Optimization Paths of Culturally Empowered Community Resilience Governance
DOI: 10.12677/ssem.2026.154100, PDF,   
作者: 赛比娅:西南民族大学管理学院,四川 成都
关键词: 文化赋能社区韧性治理SFIC框架Culture-Enabled Community Resilience Governance SFIC Framework
摘要: 社区韧性治理是应对风险社会不确定性的关键路径,而文化作为柔性治理资源正日益彰显其独特价值。文化如何通过价值凝聚增强社区韧性、韧性治理如何依托文化载体提升居民幸福感是新时代社区治理现代化的重要命题。本文基于协同治理模型(SFIC)框架分析实践场景发现,文化赋能社区韧性治理存在协同参与机制、空间互动机制、风险防范机制、情感认同机制四大核心机制,但也面临主体文化需求差异、文化空间规划不足、文化治理权力失范、过度强调形式理性等现实困境。突破困境需以建设居民为本的社区为目标,从多元参与共塑文化协同、空间拓展文化场域、制度规范文化治理、情感塑造文化社区四方面优化路径,最终建成韧性、包容、有温度的社区。
Abstract: Community resilience governance is a key pathway to addressing the uncertainties of a risk society. Culture, as a soft governance resource, is increasingly demonstrating its unique value. How culture enhances community resilience through value cohesion, and how resilience governance improves residents’ well-being through cultural carriers, are important propositions for the modernization of community governance in the new era. Based on the Synergistic Governance Model (SFIC) framework, this study analyzes practical scenarios and finds that culture-enabled community resilience governance involves four core mechanisms: collaborative participation mechanism, spatial interaction mechanism, risk prevention mechanism, and emotional identification mechanism. However, it also faces practical challenges such as differences in residents’ cultural needs, insufficient planning of cultural spaces, anomie of cultural governance power, and excessive emphasis on formal rationality. To overcome these challenges, it is necessary to build a resident-centered community. The optimization pathways include: shaping cultural synergy through diverse participation, expanding cultural fields through spatial extension, regulating cultural governance through institutional norms, and fostering cultural communities through emotional cultivation. Ultimately, the goal is to build resilient, inclusive, and warm communities.
文章引用:赛比娅. 文化赋能社区韧性治理的实现机制与优化路径[J]. 服务科学和管理, 2026, 15(4): 862-868. https://doi.org/10.12677/ssem.2026.154100

参考文献

[1] 卢轶群. 以人民需求为导向不断坚持均衡创新——上海社区文化活动中心建设发展20年[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2024, 43(12): 28-33.
[2] 王列生. 论社区文化治理的社会合力[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2020(10): 64-76.
[3] 赵定东, 万鸯鸯. 以文化人: 文化建设何以推进社区治理能力的现代化转型——基于杭州市下城区武林街道的实践分析[J]. 学习论坛, 2021(2): 88-95.
[4] 西安红专南路社区. 以红色文化赋能社区韧性治理[J]. 中国社区报, 2023(8): 12-13.
[5] Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2007) Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
[6] 余晋, 汪巍, 单威. 文化驱动下历史街区微更新治理机制构建与实践路径研究——以江西省景德镇市富强弄社区微更新项目为例[J]. 中华民居, 2026, 19(5): 48-50.
[7] 廖茂林, 苏杨, 李菲菲. 韧性系统框架下的城市社区建设[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018(4): 57-62.
[8] 李萌. 基于居民行为需求特征的“15分钟社区生活圈”规划对策研究[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2017(1): 111-118.
[9] 陈波, 宋诗雨. 虚拟文化空间生产及其维度设计研究——基于列斐伏尔“空间生产”理论[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(1): 35-43.
[10] 杨宏山, 张健培. “平急转换”: 理解基层韧性治理的新视角[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(3): 32-41, 206-207.
[11] 朱正威, 刘莹莹. 韧性治理: 风险与应急管理的新路径[J]. 行政论坛, 2020, 27(5): 81-87.
[12] 刘太刚, 向昉. “以规治情”与“以情治情”: 社区情感治理的再认识[J]. 中国行政管理, 2021(6): 11-18.
[13] 汪倩. 论城市社区文化治理面临的问题及其应对策略[J]. 江苏第二师范学院学报, 2025, 41(1): 92-98.