禹氏三角物种WRKY18基因家族的全基因组鉴定、进化特征及表达分析
Genome-Wide Identification, Evolutionary Characteristics, and Expression Analysis of the WRKY18 Gene Family in U’s Triangle Species
DOI: 10.12677/br.2026.154031, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 钟 玲, 吴文静, 谢成建, 陆俊杏*:重庆师范大学生命科学学院,植物环境适应生物学重庆市重点实验室,重庆
关键词: 禹氏三角WRKY18基因家族鉴定进化分析生物胁迫表达分析U’s Triangle WRKY18 Gene Family Identification Evolutionary Analysis Biotic Stress Expression Analysis
摘要: WRKY18转录因子在植物生长发育及逆境响应中发挥重要调控作用。禹氏三角物种为研究基因家族的进化规律提供了材料。本研究采用生物信息学方法,对禹氏三角物种中的WRKY18基因家族进行全基因组鉴定,并结合系统发育、基因结构、蛋白特性、保守基序及转录组数据,分析其进化特征与表达模式。结果表明,在二倍体基本种白菜、甘蓝、黑芥中分别鉴定出3个WRKY18基因,在四倍体复合种芥菜型油菜、甘蓝型油菜中鉴定出6个基因,而在埃塞俄比亚芥中仅鉴定出5个,基因数量变化符合禹氏三角的杂交与多倍化规律,并存在多倍体化后的基因丢失现象。系统发育与结构分析显示,26个WRKY18可分为三组,其WRKY结构域均由两个外显子编码且高度保守。保守基序分析显示,各成员均包含核心基序,但种内基序组成的差异暗示了功能上的潜在分化。转录组表达分析发现,甘蓝型油菜WRKY18基因在核盘菌胁迫下呈现复杂的时序性表达差异,且抗病品系中的诱导强度普遍高于感病品系。本研究揭示了WRKY18基因家族在芸薹属多倍体进化过程中的保留、扩张与丢失规律,证实其成员在生物胁迫响应中具有时序协同与功能分化特征,为芸薹属作物抗逆遗传改良提供了重要的基因资源与理论依据。
Abstract: The WRKY18 transcription factor plays an important regulatory role in plant growth, development, and stress responses. The species of U’s triangle provide a model for studying the evolutionary patterns of gene families. In this study, we performed a genome-wide identification of the WRKY18 gene family across U’s triangle species using bioinformatics approaches. Their evolutionary characteristics and expression patterns were analyzed by integrating phylogenetic, gene structure, protein property, conserved motif, and transcriptomic data. The results showed that three WRKY18 genes were identified in each of the diploid foundational species (B. rapa, B. oleracea, B. nigra), six genes were identified in the tetraploid complex species B. napus and B. juncea, while only five were identified in B. carinata. This variation in gene number aligns with the hybridization and polyploidization patterns of U’s triangle, with evidence of gene loss following polyploidization. Phylogenetic and structural analyses revealed that the 26 WRKY18 members could be divided into three groups, with the WRKY domain being encoded by two exons and highly conserved. Conserved motif analysis showed that all members contained the core motif; however, differences in intra-species motif composition suggested potential functional differentiation. Transcriptomic expression analysis revealed that WRKY18 members in B. napus exhibited complex temporal expression patterns under Sclerotinia sclerotiorum stress, with induction levels generally higher in resistant lines than in susceptible lines. This study reveals the retention, expansion, and loss patterns of the WRKY18 gene family during the polyploidization of Brassica species, confirms the temporal coordination and functional differentiation of its members in response to biotic stress, and provides important genetic resources and a theoretical basis for stress resistance breeding in Brassica crops.
文章引用:钟玲, 吴文静, 谢成建, 陆俊杏. 禹氏三角物种WRKY18基因家族的全基因组鉴定、进化特征及表达分析[J]. 植物学研究, 2026, 15(4): 266-279. https://doi.org/10.12677/br.2026.154031

参考文献

[1] Tian, Y., Lu, X.-Y., Peng, L.-S. and Fang, J. (2006) The Structure and Function of Plant WRKY Transcription Factors. Hereditas, 28, 1607-1612.
https://doi.org/10.1360/yc-006-1607
[2] Chen, X., Zhang, T., Wang, H., Zhao, W. and Guo, Z. (2025) Transcription Factor WRKY Complexes in Plant Signaling Pathways. Phytopathology Research, 7, Article No. 54.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-025-00349-x
[3] Li, Y., Li, X., Wei, J., Cai, K., Zhang, H., Ge, L., et al. (2021) Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of the WRKY Gene Family and Cold Stress Response in Acer truncatum. Genes (Basel), 12, Article No. 1867.
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12121867
[4] Ma, Z. and Hu, L. (2024) WRKY Transcription Factor Responses and Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25, Article No. 6845.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136845
[5] Grzechowiak, M., Ruszkowska, A., Sliwiak, J., Urbanowicz, A., Jaskolski, M. and Ruszkowski, M. (2022) New Aspects of DNA Recognition by Group II WRKY Transcription Factor Revealed by Structural and Functional Study of ATWRKY18 DNA Binding Domain. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 213, 589-601.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.05.186
[6] Sektas, M., Hasan, N. and Szybalski, W. (2001) Expression Plasmid with a Very Tight Two-Step Control: Int/Att-Mediated Gene Inversion with Respect to the Stationary Promoter. Gene, 267, 213-220.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00395-x
[7] Zheng, Z., Qamar, S.A., Chen, Z. and Mengiste, T. (2006) Arabidopsis WRKY33 Transcription Factor Is Required for Resistance to Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogens. The Plant Journal, 48, 592-605.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02901.x
[8] Lippok, B., Birkenbihl, R.P., Rivory, G., Brümmer, J., Schmelzer, E., Logemann, E., et al. (2007) Expression of AtWRKY33 Encoding a Pathogen-or PAMP-Responsive WRKY Transcription Factor Is Regulated by a Composite DNA Motif Containing W Box Elements. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®, 20, 420-429.
https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-20-4-0420
[9] Cui, Q., Yan, X., Gao, X., Zhang, D., He, H. and Jia, G. (2018) Analysis of WRKY Transcription Factors and Characterization of Two Botrytis Cinerea-Responsive LrWRKY Genes from Lilium regale. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 127, 525-536.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.04.027
[10] Cheng, F., Wu, J. and Wang, X.W. (2014) Genome Triplication Drove the Diversification of Brassica Plants. Horticulture Research, 1, 14024.
https://doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2014.24
[11] Blanc, G., Hokamp, K. and Wolfe, K.H. (2003) A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome. Genome Research, 13, 137-144.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.751803
[12] Wang, X.W., Wang, H.Z., Wang, J., et al. (2011) The Genome of the Mesopolyploid Crop Species Brassica rapa. Nature Genetics, 43, 1035-1039.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.919
[13] Cheng, F., Wu, J., Cai, X., Liang, J., Freeling, M. and Wang, X. (2018) Gene Retention, Fractionation and Subgenome Differences in Polyploid Plants. Nature Plants, 4, 258-268.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0136-7
[14] Katche, E.I., Schierholt, A., Schiessl, S.-V., He, F., Lv, Z., Batley, J., Becker, H.C. and Mason, A.S. (2023) Genetic Factors Inherited from Both Diploid Parents Interact to Affect Genome Stability and Fertility in Resynthesized Allotetraploid Brassica napus. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 13, jkad136.
https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkad136
[15] Song, X., Wei, Y., Xiao, D., Gong, K., Sun, P., Ren, Y., et al. (2021) Brassica carinata Genome Characterization Clarifies U’s Triangle Model of Evolution and Polyploidy in Brassica. Plant Physiology, 186, 388-406.
https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab048
[16] Chen, C., Wu, Y., Li, J., Wang, X., Zeng, Z., Xu, J., et al. (2023) TBtools-II: A “One for All, All for One” Bioinformatics Platform for Biological Big-Data Mining. Molecular Plant, 16, 1733-1742.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2023.09.010
[17] Irani, S., Trost, B., Waldner, M., Nayidu, N., Tu, J., Kusalik, A.J., et al. (2018) Transcriptome Analysis of Response to Plasmodiophora brassicae Infection in the Arabidopsis Shoot and Root. BMC Genomics, 19, Article No. 23.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4426-7
[18] Yuan, Y., Qin, L., Su, H., Yang, S., Wei, X., Wang, Z., et al. (2021) Transcriptome and Coexpression Network Analyses Reveal Hub Genes in Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. Pekinensis) during Different Stages of Plasmodiophora brassicae Infection. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, Article ID: 650252.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.650252
[19] Song, H., Guo, Z., Duan, Z., Li, M. and Zhang, J. (2023) WRKY Transcription Factors in Arachis Hypogaea and Its Donors: From Identification to Function Prediction. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 204, Article ID: 108131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108131
[20] Eulgem, T., Rushton, P.J., Robatzek, S. and Somssich, I.E. (2000) The WRKY Superfamily of Plant Transcription Factors. Trends in Plant Science, 5, 199-206.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01600-9
[21] Eulgem, T. and Somssich, I.E. (2007) Networks of WRKY Transcription Factors in Defense Signaling. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 10, 366-371.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.020
[22] Saha, B., Nayak, J., Srivastava, R., Samal, S., Kumar, D., Chanwala, J., et al. (2023) Unraveling the Involvement of WRKY TFs in Regulating Plant Disease Defense Signaling. Planta, 259, Article No. 7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-023-04269-y
[23] Chen, X., Tong, C., Zhang, X., Song, A., Hu, M., Dong, W., et al. (2020) A High‐Quality Brassica napus Genome Reveals Expansion of Transposable Elements, Subgenome Evolution and Disease Resistance. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 19, 615-630.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13493
[24] Wu, J., Zhao, Q., Yang, Q., Liu, H., Li, Q., Yi, X., et al. (2016) Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis Uncovers the Complex Genetic Network for Resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Brassica napus. Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 19007.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19007
[25] Li, L., Long, Y., Li, H. and Wu, X. (2020) Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Key Pathways and Hub Genes in Rapeseed during the Early Stage of Plasmodiophora brassicae Infection. Frontiers in Genetics, 10, Article No. 1275.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01275
[26] Lou, P., Wu, J., Cheng, F., Cressman, L.G., Wang, X. and McClung, C.R. (2012) Preferential Retention of Circadian Clock Genes during Diploidization Following Whole Genome Triplication in Brassica rapa. The Plant Cell, 24, 2415-2426.
https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.099499
[27] Lv, R.L., Wang, C.Y., Wang, R.S., et al. (2022) Chromosomal Instability and Phenotypic Variation in a Specific Lineage Derived from a Synthetic Allotetraploid Wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 981234.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.981234
[28] Fu, Y., Zhang, Y.F., Mason, A.S., et al. (2019) NBS-Encoding Genes in Brassica napus Evolved Rapidly after Allopolyploidization and Co-Localize with Known Disease Resistance Loci. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 26.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00026
[29] Um, T.Y., Lee, H.Y., Lee, S., et al. (2018) Jasmonate Zim-Domain Protein 9 Interacts with Slender Rice 1 to Mediate the Antagonistic Interaction between Jasmonic and Gibberellic Acid Signals in Rice. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1866.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01866
[30] Tang, Y. and Xia, P. (2025) WRKY Transcription Factors: Key Regulators in Plant Drought Tolerance. Plant Science, 359, Article ID: 112647.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2025.112647
[31] Liu, X.F., Zhao, H.Y., Yuan, M.Y., et al. (2024) An Effector Essential for Virulence of Necrotrophic Fungi Targets Plant HIRs to Inhibit Host Immunity. Nature Communications, 15, Article No. 9391.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53725-0