复杂天气下融合边缘增强与内容感知特征重构的道路目标检测方法
Edge-Enhanced and Content-Aware Feature Reconstruction for Road Object Detection in Adverse Weather
摘要: 复杂天气条件下,道路图像容易出现对比度下降、边缘模糊和雨雪噪声干扰等退化现象,导致目标检测模型出现漏检、误检和定位不稳定等问题。针对上述问题,本文基于YOLO11提出一种融合边缘增强与内容感知特征重构的道路目标检测方法WRA-YOLO。首先,在骨干网络前端引入深度可分离小波卷积模块(Depthwise Wavelet Transform Convolution, DW-WTConv),通过离散小波变换显式分解低频结构与高频边缘信息,缓解下采样造成的细节丢失;其次,设计内容自适应特征重校准模块(Block Attention Residual, BlockAttnRes),利用可学习伪查询向量与RMSNorm对多层特征进行动态加权融合,降低复杂天气背景噪声对特征融合的干扰;最后,引入最小点距离交并比(Minimum Point Distance IoU, MPDIoU)损失函数,以角点距离约束优化边界框回归。实验结果表明,WRA-YOLO在DAWN数据集上的mAP@0.5由72.28%提升至75.42%,在RTTS数据集上的mAP@0.5由63.40%提升至65.56%,说明该方法在雾、雨、雪和沙尘暴等复杂天气道路场景中具有较好的检测适应性。
Abstract: Road images captured under adverse weather often suffer from low contrast, blurred boundaries and rain/snow noise, which degrades the robustness of object detectors. To address this issue, this paper proposes WRA-YOLO, an improved YOLO11-based detector integrating edge enhancement and content-aware feature reconstruction. First, a depthwise wavelet transform convolution module (DW-WTConv) is introduced into the early backbone to explicitly decompose low-frequency structures and high-frequency edge details, thereby reducing detail loss caused by downsampling. Second, a content-adaptive feature recalibration module (BlockAttnRes) is designed to dynamically fuse multi-level features using learnable pseudo-query vectors and RMSNorm, suppressing noisy semantic responses in adverse weather. Finally, MPDIoU loss is employed to improve bounding box regression by constraining corner-point distances. Experiments show that WRA-YOLO improves mAP@0.5 from 72.28% to 75.42% on DAWN and from 63.40% to 65.56% on RTTS, demonstrating better adaptability to road scenes under fog, rain, snow and sandstorm conditions.
文章引用:董林林, 徐长波. 复杂天气下融合边缘增强与内容感知特征重构的道路目标检测方法[J]. 人工智能与机器人研究, 2026, 15(4): 1075-1084. https://doi.org/10.12677/airr.2026.154097

参考文献

[1] Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A. and Qiu, J. (2023) YOLO by Ultralytics.
https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
[2] Narasimhan, S.G. and Nayar, S.K. (2002) Vision and the Atmosphere. International Journal of Computer Vision, 48, 233-254.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016328200723
[3] Sakaridis, C., Dai, D. and Van Gool, L. (2018) Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Data. International Journal of Computer Vision, 126, 973-992.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-018-1072-8
[4] Michaelis, C., Mitzkus, B., Geirhos, R., et al. (2019) Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving When Winter Is Coming. arXiv: 1907.07484.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07484
[5] 刘袁缘, 王超凡, 王文斌, 张浩宇, 罗忠文. 面向多种天气场景下目标检测的多域动态平均教师模型[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2024, 36(3): 388-398.
[6] Liu, W., Ren, G., Yu, R., Guo, S., Zhu, J. and Zhang, L. (2022) Image-Adaptive YOLO for Object Detection in Adverse Weather Conditions. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36, 1792-1800.
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i2.20072
[7] Ding, Q., Li, P., Yan, X., Shi, D., Liang, L., Wang, W., et al. (2023) CF-YOLO: Cross Fusion YOLO for Object Detection in Adverse Weather with a High-Quality Real Snow Dataset. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24, 10749-10759.
https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2023.3285035
[8] Ogino, Y., Shoji, Y., Toizumi, T. and Ito, A. (2025) ERUP-YOLO: Enhancing Object Detection Robustness for Adverse Weather Condition by Unified Image-Adaptive Processing. 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Tucson, 26 February-6 March 2025, 8597-8605.
https://doi.org/10.1109/wacv61041.2025.00833
[9] Lin, T., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B. and Belongie, S. (2017) Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, 21-26 July 2017, 936-944.
https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2017.106
[10] Liu, S., Qi, L., Qin, H., Shi, J. and Jia, J. (2018) Path Aggregation Network for Instance Segmentation. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, 18-23 June 2018, 8759-8768.
https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2018.00913
[11] Mallat, S. (2008) A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. 3rd Edition, Academic Press.
[12] Fujieda S, Takayama K, Hachisuka T. (2018) Wavelet Convolutional Neural Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Salt Lake City, 18-23 June 2018, 58-66.
[13] Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., et al. (2017) Attention Is All You Need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, 4-9 December 2017, 5998-6008.
[14] Ma, S. and Xu, Y. (2023) MPDIoU: A Loss for Efficient and Accurate Bounding Box Regression. arXiv: 2307.07662.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07662
[15] Rezatofighi, H., Tsoi, N., Gwak, J., Sadeghian, A., Reid, I. and Savarese, S. (2019) Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and a Loss for Bounding Box Regression. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, 15-20 June 2019, 658-666.
https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2019.00075