汉越空间维度词“宽/窄(rộng/hẹp)”的对比研究
Comparative Study of the Spatial Dimension Terms “Wide/Narrow (rộng/hẹp)” in Chinese and Vietnamese
摘要: 从语义学的角度来看,本文运用词汇语义分析理论和认知语言学中的对比理论,对汉语与越南语空间维度词汇“宽/窄(rộng/hẹp)”在空间及隐喻意义上的相似与差异之处进行了分析和比较。从语义和隐喻的角度而言,汉语词汇“宽、窄”及其对应的越南语词汇“rộng/hẹp”在大多数情况下是相似的,且具有对应的用法。然而,由于每种语言的独特特征以及词汇使用惯例的差异,在某些特定语境下仍会出现应用上的差异。每种语言都有其独特的表达方式,两者之间并不存在完全对等的用法模式。
Abstract: From a semantic perspective, this paper applies the lexical semantic analysis theory and contrastive theory within cognitive linguistics to analyze and compare the similarities and differences in the spatial and metaphorical meanings of the Chinese-Vietnamese spatial dimension words “kuan/zhai” and their Vietnamese equivalents “rộng/hẹp”. From semantic and metaphorical standpoints, the Chinese words “kuan/zhai” and their corresponding Vietnamese terms “rộng/hẹp” are similar in most cases and have equivalent usages. However, due to the unique characteristics of each language and differences in word usage conventions, discrepancies in their application still emerge in certain specific contexts; each language has its own distinct modes of expression, and there are no fully equivalent usage patterns between the two.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
任永军. 现代汉语空间维度词语义分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 延边: 延边大学, 2000.
|
|
[2]
|
孙敏庆. 俄汉语空间维度词对比分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2009.
|
|
[3]
|
孙敏庆. 俄汉语空间维度词“大/小”隐喻义对比分析[D]. 黑龙江教育学院学报, 2009, 28(3): 113-115.
|
|
[4]
|
张志军, 苏珊珊. 俄汉语直线型空间维度词的对比分析[J]. 中国俄语教学, 2014, 33(2): 44-49.
|
|
[5]
|
Dinh Bich Thao. 汉越语言空间维度词“深/浅(sâu/nông)”的空间语义分析[J]. 吉林省教育学院学报, 2015, 30(4): 129-131.
|
|
[6]
|
周连英. 现代汉语空间维度词的语义研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2020.
|
|
[7]
|
侯晓雪. 基于语料库的韩国学生空间维度词“高、低/矮” “大、小”偏误研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 延边: 延边大学, 2022.
|
|
[8]
|
邵美丽. 空间维度词“厚”与“Thick”、“薄”与“Thin”的语义引申及对外汉语教学[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2022.
|
|
[9]
|
中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. 现代汉语词典[M]. 第7版. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016.
|
|
[10]
|
黄批. 越南语词典[M]. 河内: 社会科学印书馆, 1998.
|