分配正义与矫正正义:《尼各马可伦理学》第五卷的政治启示
Distributive Justice and Corrective Justice: Political Implications of Book V of the Nicomachean Ethics
摘要: 亚里士多德在《尼各马可伦理学》第五卷中对“具体正义”的划分,构筑了政治共同体得以存续的规范性基础。分配正义遵循几何比例原则,依据个体客观差异确立宏观价值秩序与资源配置框架;矫正正义则遵循算术比例原则,通过悬置身份差异,维系微观私人交往中非人格化的法治边界。这两种机制在逻辑上相互预设、在功能上深度嵌合,成功将防范“贪婪”的内在伦理诉求转化为外在的、可操作的制度化规范。重新审视这一古典双重正义结构,不仅揭示了正义从抽象道德品质向具体政治制度跨越的内在逻辑,更为了解现代多元社会中宏观分配失衡如何侵蚀微观法律平等的结构性危机,提供了一个兼具逻辑严密性与穿透力的哲学诊断框架。
Abstract: Aristotle’s classification of “concrete justice” in Book V of the Nicomachean Ethics lays the normative foundation for the existence of political communities. Distributive justice follows the principle of geometric proportion, establishing a macro-value order and a framework for resource allocation based on objective individual differences; corrective justice follows the principle of arithmetic proportion, maintaining the impersonal legal boundaries in micro-private interactions by suspending identity differences. These two mechanisms logically presuppose and functionally fit together, successfully transforming the inherent ethical pursuit of preventing “greed” into external, operational institutional norms. Revisiting this classical dual justice structure not only reveals the inherent logic of justice’s leap from abstract moral qualities to concrete political institutions, but also provides a philosophical diagnostic framework that is both logically rigorous and penetrating, for understanding the structural crisis of how macro-distribution imbalances erode micro-legal equality in modern pluralistic societies.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
亚里士多德. 政治学[M]. 吴寿彭, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017.
|
|
[2]
|
亚里士多德. 尼各马可伦理学[M]. 廖申白, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2003.
|
|
[3]
|
马雪影. 亚里士多德的自然正义[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2008(12): 4.
|
|
[4]
|
程远航. 分配正义: 从亚里士多德、斯密到马克思[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(3): 11-17.
|
|
[5]
|
黄建军. 唯物史观论域中的分配正义及历史生成逻辑[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021(8): 22.
|
|
[6]
|
廖申白. 西方正义概念: 嬗变中的综合[J]. 哲学研究, 2002(11): 8.
|