工程化导向下土建类线性代数课程教学改革探索
Exploration on Engineering-Oriented Teaching Reform of Linear Algebra for Civil Engineering Majors
摘要: 新工科建设背景下,土建类专业对学生数学基础、工程建模能力与数字化分析能力提出了复合性要求。线性代数课程中的矩阵、向量、线性方程组、特征值与最小二乘法等核心内容,不应局限于符号演算与手算训练,而应转化为学生理解结构计算、空间定位、工程数据处理与工程决策的基础工具。针对当前土建类线性代数教学中存在的内容学科化倾向突出、工程背景弱化、计算工具应用不足以及评价方式单一等问题,文章提出工程化导向的课程教学改革框架。该框架以土建工程典型问题为牵引,以矩阵和向量为知识主线,以计算工具为技术支撑,以专业衔接为培养出口,构建“结构矩阵基础、空间几何变换、工程数据求解”三模块递进式内容体系,并设计“问题导入–数学抽象–软件赋能–工程反思”四步课堂教学法。通过桁架内力计算、构件坐标转换、沉降观测数据拟合等典型案例,实现数学知识传授、工程应用能力培养、职业责任塑造与价值引领的有机融合。同时,文章加入准实验验证方案、实施挑战与应对策略及附录化教学设计样例,明确该框架仍需通过实验班–对照班比较、学习过程数据和质性反馈持续检验,以增强改革结论的证据支撑和可复制性。
Abstract: Under the background of emerging engineering education, civil engineering majors are required to have comprehensive abilities in mathematical foundation, engineering modeling and digital analysis. The core contents of linear algebra, including matrices, vectors, systems of linear equations, eigenvalues and the least-squares method, should not be limited to symbolic manipulation and manual calculation. Instead, they should be transformed into fundamental tools for students to understand structural computation, spatial positioning, engineering data processing and decision-making. In view of the prominent problems in current teaching, such as discipline-centered content, weak engineering context, insufficient application of computational tools and single assessment method, this paper proposes an engineering-oriented teaching reform framework for linear algebra courses. Guided by typical civil engineering problems, organized by matrices and vectors, supported by computational tools and oriented toward professional connection, the framework constructs a progressive three-module content system consisting of “structural matrix foundation, spatial geometric transformation and engineering data solution”, and designs a four-step classroom teaching method of “problem introduction-mathematical abstraction-software empowerment-engineering reflection”. Through typical cases such as truss internal force calculation, component coordinate transformation and settlement observation data fitting, the organic integration of mathematical knowledge teaching, engineering application ability training, professional responsibility shaping and value guidance is realized. In addition, this paper supplements a quasi-experimental verification design, an analysis of implementation challenges and countermeasures, and an appendix-based teaching design example, emphasizing that the framework should be continuously examined through comparisons between experimental and control classes, learning-process data and qualitative feedback.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
教育信息化2.0行动计划[EB/OL]. https://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201804/t20180425_334188.html, 2018-04-18.
|
|
[2]
|
教育部高等教育司关于开展新工科研究与实践的通知[EB/OL]. https://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A08/tongzhi/201702/t20170223_297158.html, 2017-02-23.
|
|
[3]
|
周义. 探索大数据时代高校线性代数的教学改革[J]. 信息记录材料, 2021, 22(1): 38-39.
|
|
[4]
|
李晓莎. 信息化教学的时代背景下“高等代数”课程教学改革的一点思考[J]. 科技风, 2022(10): 113-115.
|
|
[5]
|
冯英华. 信息化时代高等数学教学探析[J]. 吉林农业科技学院学报, 2020, 29(6): 118-121.
|
|
[6]
|
关丽红, 朱天晓. “互联网+”时代高等数学课程混合式教学改革的探讨[J]. 长春大学学报, 2021, 31(10): 101-104.
|
|
[7]
|
王珂, 李怡馨. 人工智能时代下线性代数的教学改革[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(1): 1128-1136.
|
|
[8]
|
尹富纲. 计算思维融入近世代数课程的教学改革研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(1): 386-392.
|
|
[9]
|
李岚, 刘孝艳, 钱婷, 陆爱国. 人工智能赋能地方高校分析类课程教学改革和实践[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(4): 874-878.
|
|
[10]
|
范存辉, 周翊, 连承波, 等. 能源类专业基础地质类课程群思政育人创新与实践[J]. 高教学刊, 2025, 11(16): 193-196.
|
|
[11]
|
陈晓娟, 王少峰, 郭晓峰. 基于OBE理念的机械类专业课程思政建设与探索——以热工基础及流体力学课程为例[J]. 吉林教育, 2025(32): 36-38.
|
|
[12]
|
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L.S. and Admiraal, W. (2020) A Review of Project-Based Learning in Higher Education: Student Outcomes and Measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
|
|
[13]
|
Chen, J., Kolmos, A. and Du, X. (2020) Forms of Implementation and Challenges of PBL in Engineering Education: A Review of Literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46, 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615
|
|
[14]
|
Premalatha, K. (2019) Course and Program Outcomes Assessment Methods in Outcome-Based Education: A Review. Journal of Education, 199, 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057419854351
|
|
[15]
|
Lyon, J.A. and J. Magana, A. (2020) Computational Thinking in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28, 1174-1189. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22295
|
|
[16]
|
Capili, B. and Anastasi, J.K. (2024) An Introduction to Types of Quasi-Experimental Designs. AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 124, 50-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0001081740.74815.20
|