超越“银发焦虑”:老龄化社会治理的话语重构与公共政策转向
Beyond “Silver-Haired Anxiety”: Discourse Reconstruction and Public Policy Shift in the Governance of Aging Society
摘要: 长期以来,中国社会围绕人口老龄化形成了一种以“焦虑”为核心的话语体系,“人口海啸”“银发危机”“未富先老”等表述充斥于公共讨论与政策叙事之中。这种负面话语不仅塑造了公众对老龄社会的悲观预期,更深刻影响着政策制定的底层逻辑——将老年人视为需要“应对”的负担而非需要“开发”的资源。本文从话语分析的视角出发,系统审视“银发焦虑”的三种典型叙事——经济负担话语、劳动力短缺话语和医疗黑洞话语,剖析其政策后果与社会效应。在此基础上,超越单纯的话语批判,从治理思维的深层转型出发,探讨话语重构的多元路径:重新定义老年群体的消费者、生产者与公民三重角色,推动统计指标从“抚养比”向“参与率”转型,并据此提出促进老年社会参与、营造代际融合环境的具体政策建议。本文认为,改变叙事是改变现实的起点,建设老龄友好社会需要一场从话语到制度的系统性转向。
Abstract: For a long time, a discourse system centered on “anxiety” has taken shape around population aging in Chinese society. Expressions such as “demographic tsunami,” “silver-haired crisis,” and “aging before affluence” pervade public discussion and policy narratives. This negative discourse not only shapes public pessimism toward an aging society but also profoundly influences the underlying logic of policymaking—framing older adults as a “burden” to be managed rather than a “resource” to be developed. Adopting a discourse analysis perspective, this paper systematically examines three typical narratives of “silver-haired anxiety”—the discourse of economic burden, the discourse of labor shortage, and the discourse of healthcare abyss—and analyzes their policy consequences and social effects. On this basis, moving beyond mere discourse critique, the paper explores multiple pathways of discourse reconstruction through a deep transformation of governance thinking: redefining the triple roles of older adults as consumers, producers, and citizens, promoting a statistical shift from “dependency ratio” to “participation rate,” and accordingly putting forward specific policy recommendations for fostering social participation among older adults and creating an environment of intergenerational integration. This paper argues that changing the narrative is the starting point for changing reality, and building an age-friendly society requires a systematic shift from discourse to institutions.
文章引用:宋傲. 超越“银发焦虑”:老龄化社会治理的话语重构与公共政策转向[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(7): 423-429. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.137474

参考文献

[1] 范晓光, 李岩. 危机与抗争: 老年身份的媒介生产与话语批判[J]. 编辑之友, 2023(3): 66-70.
[2] 曹信邦, 李远忠. 基于人口老龄化的延迟退休、养老金缴费率与经济增长——兼论缴费政策的调整[J]. 西北人口, 2022, 43(6): 25-39.
[3] 徐莺, 刘含笑. 中国“银发经济”的现状、问题与前景[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 36(1): 140-147.
[4] 陈友华, 詹国辉. 中国老年人力资源开发: 现状、问题与出路[J]. 晋阳学刊, 2023(2): 44-53.
[5] 孙鹃娟. 健康老龄化视域下的老年照护服务体系: 理论探讨与制度构想[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 35(5): 1-8+42.
[6] 张文娟, 付敏. 2010~2020年中国老年人口的健康状况及其变化趋势——基于人口普查和抽样调查数据的分析[J]. 中国人口科学, 2022(5): 17-31.
[7] 周裕琼, 叶哲佑. 从家事到国事: 老龄化议题中网络舆论与公共政策的互动关系[J]. 新闻与写作, 2023(6): 52-64.
[8] 庞一凡. 积极应对人口老龄化背景下中国老年人力资本开发研究[J]. 现代营销(上), 2023(4): 142-144.
[9] 钱宁. 积极老龄化福利政策视角下的老年志愿服务[J]. 探索, 2015(5): 135-139.
[10] 彭翔. 代际共融: 迈向老龄文明时代的养老体系建构[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 46(5): 100-107+124.
[11] 赵茜, 阳芷涵, 李珎. 基于CiteSpace的国内社区代际共融研究热点及趋势研究[J]. 现代城市研究, 2025, 40(12): 48-53.