电商弱势消费者司法人工智能救济的壁垒与破解路径
Barriers and Solutions to Judicial Artificial Intelligence Relief for E-Commerce Vulnerable Consumers
摘要: 随着智慧司法深度普及与电商消费纠纷持续增长,司法人工智能已成为电商消费维权的重要工具,但其对数字弱势消费者救济的影响仍存在理论与实践争议。本文以电商领域老年、农村等数字弱势消费者为研究对象,系统分析司法人工智能在电商纠纷救济中的双重面向。本应打破维权壁垒的司法人工智能,在实践中因效率优先导向、群体适配缺失、全流程管控缺位,异化为数字弱势消费者维权的新障碍,形成覆盖准入、程序、实体的三重救济壁垒。据此,本文提出面向数字弱势消费者的规制体系,以期推动司法人工智能回归司法为民初衷,保障数字弱势消费者的平等司法救济权。
Abstract: With the in-depth popularization of smart justice and the continuous growth of e-commerce consumer disputes, judicial artificial intelligence has become an important tool for e-commerce consumer rights protection. However, there are still theoretical and practical controversies over its impact on the relief of digitally vulnerable consumers. Taking digitally vulnerable consumers in the e-commerce field, such as the elderly and rural residents, as the research object, this paper systematically analyzes the dual dimensions of judicial artificial intelligence in the relief of e-commerce disputes. Judicial artificial intelligence, which is supposed to break down barriers to rights protection, has been alienated into a new obstacle to the rights protection of digitally vulnerable consumers in practice due to the efficiency-first orientation, lack of group-specific adaptation, and absence of full-process supervision and control, forming a three-fold relief barrier covering access, procedure, and substance. On this basis, this paper proposes a regulatory system for digitally vulnerable consumers, with a view to promoting judicial artificial intelligence to return to the original aspiration of justice for the people and guaranteeing the equal right to judicial relief for digitally vulnerable consumers.
文章引用:孟杨. 电商弱势消费者司法人工智能救济的壁垒与破解路径[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(7): 930-938. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.157836

参考文献

[1] 中国互联网信息中心. 数字消费发展报告(2025) [EB/OL].
https://www.cnnic.cn/n4/2025/1226/c88-11445.html, 2026-03-19.
[2] 江西法院网. 江西高院召开消费者权益保护审判工作新闻发布会[EB/OL]. 2026-03-13.
https://jxgy.jxfy.gov.cn/article/detail/2026/03/id/9232368.shtml, 2026-03-19.
[3] 四川省人民法院. ××法院关于近三年网络消费纠纷案件的统计分析[EB/OL].
http://scfy.scssfw.gov.cn/article/detail/2025/06/id/8864236.shtml, 2026-03-19.
[4] 张钦昱. 电子商务平台治理的理念转型与制度调适[J]. 法学评论, 2025, 43(6): 145-156.
[5] 武腾. 电子商务平台经营者的侵权责任[J]. 法商研究, 2022, 39(2): 103-115.
[6] 孟醒. 智慧法院建设对接近正义的双刃剑效应与规制路径[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2020(6): 33-44, 206.
[7] 何颖, 季连帅. 论我国消费者维权成本过高的原因及解决对策[J]. 学习与探索, 2013(6): 73-77.
[8] 刘万成, 姚宁怡. 论适老型诉讼机制的建构[J]. 温州大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 36(5): 107-116.
[9] 胡昌明. 移动电子诉讼的司法实践及其限度——以中国“移动微法院”为例[J]. 中国应用法学, 2021(2): 73-85.
[10] 程睿. 双轨并行模式中在线诉讼的同意规则[J]. 现代法学, 2023, 45(5): 90-111.
[11] 胡学军. 在线庭审当事人程序选择权的形态与保障[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2024(4): 48-58, 2, 237.
[12] 黄健. 数字经济时代基于运营平台电子取证的趋势与应对[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 45(1): 62-69.
[13] 李佩霖, 钟晗. 承袭的偏见: 人工智能司法中偏见的成因与矫正[J]. 河北工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 17(2): 75-81.
[14] 陈婉玲, 胡莹莹. 场景消费时代我国消费者保护法的功能拓展——从弱者倾斜保护到能力提升激励[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2022(10): 64-73, 157.
[15] 沈伟伟. 数字时代司法触达的发展、挑战与制度完善[J]. 政法论丛, 2024(6): 86-97.
[16] 丁晓东. 人机交互决策下的智慧司法[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2023, 41(4): 58-68.
[17] 胡晓霞. 消费纠纷的在线解决: 国外典型经验与中国方案[J]. 法学论坛, 2019, 34(4): 106-115.