数字时代中外代际文化反哺的实践差异与优化路径——基于老年人社会资本建构的视角
Differences in Practices and Pathways for Optimization in Intergenerational Cultural Exchange between China and the West in the Digital Age—From the Perspective of Social Capital Construction among the Elderly
摘要: 在全球老龄化与数字化双轮交织的时代背景下,代际文化反哺作为反向社会化的核心形式,成为重塑代际关系、助力老年人积累社会资本、实现积极老龄化的关键路径。本文基于社会资本理论视角,系统对比中西方数字代际文化反哺的实践形态、运行逻辑与社会影响,揭示了中国家庭本位、情感驱动、非正式主导与西方社会本位、技能导向、制度化支撑的本质差异。研究发现,文化传统、养老模式、数字治理体系共同塑造反哺形态差异,数字反哺不仅作用于传统联结资本、桥接资本、信任资本,更催生了以数字平台为载体、以线上弱关系为核心的“数字桥接资本”;在中国强关系主导的文化语境下,数字反哺呈现出联结资本高效转化、桥接资本转化阻滞、信任资本圈层化累积的独特效率特征。立足中国老龄化国情与文化根基,结合西方可借鉴经验,提出针对性优化路径,为健康老龄化与积极老龄化提供社会视角的实践方案。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of an era characterized by the interplay of global aging and digitalization, intergenerational cultural reciprocity—as a core form of reverse socialization—has emerged as a key pathway for reshaping intergenerational relationships, helping older adults accumulate social capital, and achieving active aging. Drawing on social capital theory, this paper systematically compares the practical forms, operational logic, and social impacts of digital intergenerational cultural reciprocity in China and the West, revealing fundamental differences between China’s family-centered, emotion-driven, and informally dominated approach and the West’s society-centered, skill-oriented, and institutionally supported model. The study finds that cultural traditions, eldercare models, and digital governance systems collectively shape the differences in the forms of intergenerational cultural reciprocity. Digital reciprocity not only influences traditional relational capital, bridging capital, and trust capital, but also gives rise to “digital bridging capital”—a form centered on online weak ties and facilitated by digital platforms. Within China’s cultural context, where strong ties dominate, digital reciprocity exhibits unique patterns of efficiency: the efficient conversion of relational capital, the stagnation of bridging capital conversion, and the stratified accumulation of trust capital. Grounded in China’s demographic realities and cultural foundations, and drawing on relevant Western experiences, the study proposes targeted optimization strategies, offering practical solutions from a social perspective to support healthy and active aging.
文章引用:刘童洁. 数字时代中外代际文化反哺的实践差异与优化路径——基于老年人社会资本建构的视角[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(7): 466-473. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.137480

参考文献

[1] 国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2025年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[R/OL]. 2026.
https://www.stats.gov.cn/zwfwck/sjfb/202602/t20260228_1962662.html, 2026-04-19.
[2] 周晓虹. 文化反哺: 变迁社会中的亲子传承[J]. 社会学研究, 2000(2): 51-66.
[3] 王彦斌, 许卫高. 老龄化、社会资本与积极老龄化[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2014(3): 60-66.
[4] 费孝通. 家庭结构变动中的老年赡养问题——再论中国家庭结构的变动[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1983, 20(3): 7-16.
[5] 吴晓功, 江晶. 人口老龄化对家庭结构和代际关系的影响及应对策略研究[J]. 老龄化研究, 2025, 12(7): 673-677.
[6] 魏华忠, 杨晓. 老龄化社会教育对策的跨文化研究[J]. 人口与经济, 2002(1): 49-55.
[7] 崔国东. 重新探讨工作中成功老龄化的内涵、前因及结果: 基于代际互动视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(10): 1593-1609.
[8] 孙伟. 人口老龄化背景下中外老年人生活养老现状对比分析[J]. 爱情婚姻家庭(下旬), 2021(7): 280-281.
[9] 田晨. 老龄化背景下养老机构中跨文化教育的推进与实践[J]. 老龄化研究, 2023, 10(4): 1199-1203.
[10] 周晓虹. 从颠覆、成长走向共生与契洽——文化反哺的代际影响与社会意义[J]. 河北学刊, 2015, 35(3): 104-110.
[11] 全民数字素养与技能发展水平调查研究组. 全民数字素养与技能发展水平调查报告(2024) [R/OL]. 北京: 中央网络安全和信息化委员会办公室, 2024.
https://www.cac.gov.cn/rootimages/uploadimg/1731546601041335/1731546601041335.pdf, 2026-04-19.
[12] 周裕琼. 数字代沟与文化反哺: 对家庭内“静悄悄的革命”的量化考察[J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2014, 36(2): 117-123.
[13] 徐梦, 陈淑晴. 社会资本的角色定位和功能发挥——基于健康老龄化建设的经验研究[J]. 国际商务财会, 2022(6): 83-87.
[14] 孙如梦. 数字鸿沟与数字反哺: 新媒体对农村家庭代际互动的影响探究[J]. 老龄化研究, 2024, 11(4): 1454-1461.