泰山文化负载词的英译策略研究——以《泰山岩岩·泰山与中华文化》第四章为例
A Study on the English Translation Strategies of Culture-Loaded Words in Mount Tai Discourse —A Study Case of “Majesty Mountain Tai: A Pillar of Chinese Culture” (Chapter Four)
摘要: 在中华文化“走出去”的时代背景下,文化负载词的英译是制约中国文化对外传播效果的关键环节。本文以《泰山岩岩·泰山与中华文化》第四章为研究语料,以翻译补偿理论与目的论为指导框架,借鉴奈达的文化分类理论将原文中的文化负载词划分为物质文化词、社会文化词、宗教文化词和语言文化词四类,通过典型案例考察音译加注、直译加注和释义三种策略的适用条件与补偿效果。研究发现,三种策略的选择受到文化负载词的类型、信息密度、翻译目的及目标读者认知需求的共同制约:音译加注最适用于承载独特历史制度或哲学体系的术语,直译加注适用于具有可见文化意象的词汇,释义则适用于隐喻差异显著或形式高度凝练的表达;灵活选择并组合运用翻译策略,方能实现文化信息保留与译文可读性之间的动态平衡。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of Chinese culture’s global dissemination, the English translation of culture-loaded words remains a pivotal challenge in cross-cultural communication. This study examines Chapter 4 of “Majesty Mountain Tai: A Pillar of Chinese Culture” as its primary corpus, employing Nida’s cultural taxonomy to classify culture-loaded words into four categories: material, social, religious, and linguistic. Guided by translation compensation theory and Skopos theory, it investigates the applicability and compensatory efficacy of three strategies, transliteration with annotation, literal translation with annotation, and paraphrase, through close analysis of representative cases. The findings indicate that strategy selection is determined by the interplay of word type, information density, and target readers’ cognitive requirements. Specifically, transliteration with annotation proves most effective for terms rooted in unique historical institutions or philosophical systems; literal translation with annotation best serves words conveying salient cultural imagery; and paraphrase is optimally suited to expressions characterized by marked metaphorical divergence or high lexical compression. The study concludes that a dynamic equilibrium between cultural fidelity and readability can only be achieved through the flexible deployment of these strategies.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
管邦迪, 向明友. 翻译过程的概念整合新解——以《红楼梦》文化负载词英译为例[J]. 外语教学, 2024, 45(1): 95-100.
|
|
[2]
|
包惠南, 包昂. 中国文化与汉英翻译[M]. 北京: 外文出版社, 2004.
|
|
[3]
|
高文成, 吴超异. 体认语言学视野下《离骚》中文化负载词的英译研究[J]. 语言与翻译, 2021(2): 42-50.
|
|
[4]
|
赵艳萍. “泰山石敢当文化”的传承及外宣英译研究[J]. 文学教育(上), 2019(4): 142-143.
|
|
[5]
|
夏廷德. 翻译补偿研究[M]. 武汉: 湖北教育出版社, 2006.
|
|
[6]
|
柯平. 加注和增益——谈变通和补偿手段[J]. 中国翻译, 1991(1): 23-26.
|
|
[7]
|
曾祥宏, 习海宇. 翻译补偿层面研究[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014(1): 226-228.
|
|
[8]
|
Reiss, K. and Vermeer, H.J. (2013) Towards a General Theory of Translational Action: Skopos Theory Explained. Routledge.
|
|
[9]
|
刘翌, 包通法. 《孟子》译本精神构式比较研究[J]. 上海翻译, 2015(2): 70-76.
|
|
[10]
|
刘慧. 泰山岩岩: 泰山与中华文化[M]. 济南: 山东人民出版社, 2025.
|
|
[11]
|
贾云鹏. 汉语四字成语翻译中的文化补偿与缺失[J]. 语文建设, 2015(9): 65-66.
|