超深井油页岩地层水泥环材料参数优选及井筒完整性评价
Optimization of Cement Sheath Material Parameters and Wellbore Integrity Evaluation for Oil Shale Formation in Ultra-Deep Wells
DOI: 10.12677/me.2026.144107, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张博文, 王鑫尧, 赵宇杰, 王 英:辽宁工业大学土木建筑工程学院,辽宁 锦州;李 源:山西冶金岩土工程勘察有限公司,山西 太原
关键词: 油页岩韧性水泥环参数优选环向应力井筒完整性Oil Shale Tough Cement Sheath Parameter Optimization Hoop Stress Wellbore Integrity
摘要: 针对超深井油页岩地层高地应力与高内压工况下水泥环韧性评价不足、材料参数优选缺乏依据的问题,基于ABAQUS建立水泥环数值模型,采用混凝土损伤塑性本构描述水泥环非线性力学行为,系统研究弹性模量5~30 GPa、泊松比0.16~0.28范围内6组参数组合下的应力分布与环向应力–应变全曲线,以峰值应力、韧性指数、残余强度及软化行为为指标优选材料参数。研究结果表明,低弹性模量与高泊松比的协同作用可显著改善水泥环力学韧性,A2组(弹性模量5 Gpa,泊松比0.26)综合性能最优,韧性指数最高,达3.58 MJ/m3,较A3组(弹性模量15 Gpa,泊松比0.16)提高27.4%,且软化段平缓。与A3组相比,A2组水泥环内壁环向应力的周向波动明显减小,危险点应力集中得到有效缓解。优选参数与现有弹韧性水泥浆配方可实现范围一致,具备工程转化可行性。建议超深井油页岩地层固井水泥环采用低弹性模量、高泊松比的韧性材料参数,以降低高地应力与高内压作用下的内壁应力集中,延缓裂纹的萌生和扩展,从而保障水泥环的长期密封完整性。
Abstract: To address the insufficient toughness evaluation of cement sheath and the lack of basis for material parameter optimization under high in-situ stress and high internal pressure in ultra-deep oil shale formations, a numerical model of the cement sheath was established based on ABAQUS. The concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) constitutive model was adopted to describe the nonlinear mechanical behavior of the cement sheath. Six parameter combinations with elastic moduli ranging from 5 to 30 GPa and Poisson’s ratios ranging from 0.16 to 0.28 were systematically studied, focusing on stress distribution and hoop stress-strain full curves. Material parameters were optimized using peak stress, toughness index, residual strength, and softening behavior as evaluation indicators. The results show that the synergistic effect of low elastic modulus and high Poisson’s ratio can significantly improve the mechanical toughness of the cement sheath. Group A2 (elastic modulus of 5 GPa and Poisson’s ratio of 0.26) exhibits the best comprehensive performance, with the highest toughness index reaching 3.58 MJ/m3, which is 27.4% higher than that of Group A3 (elastic modulus of 15 GPa and Poisson’s ratio of 0.16), and a gentle softening stage. Compared with the conventional Group A3, the circumferential fluctuation of hoop stress on the inner wall is reduced, and the stress concentration at the critical point is effectively alleviated. The optimized parameters are consistent with the achievable range of existing elastic-tough cement slurry formulations, demonstrating engineering conversion feasibility. It is recommended that the cement sheath in ultra-deep oil shale formations adopt tough material parameters with low elastic modulus and high Poisson’s ratio, which can reduce stress concentration on the inner wall and delay crack initiation and propagation under high in-situ stress and high internal pressure, thereby ensuring the long-term sealing integrity of the cement sheath.
文章引用:张博文, 王鑫尧, 赵宇杰, 王英, 李源. 超深井油页岩地层水泥环材料参数优选及井筒完整性评价[J]. 矿山工程, 2026, 14(4): 1078-1087. https://doi.org/10.12677/me.2026.144107

参考文献

[1] 魏国齐, 郑雅丽, 邱小松, 等. 中国地下储气库地质理论与应用[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(12): 1519-1530.
[2] 初纬, 沈吉云, 杨云飞, 等. 连续变化内压下套管-水泥环-围岩组合体微环隙计算[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(3): 379-385.
[3] 王黎松, 高宝奎, 胡天祥, 等. 考虑材料非线性的环空增压预测模型[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 235-243.
[4] 赵垒, 闫怡飞, 王鹏, 等. 气井生产过程中碳钢管柱CO2腐蚀规律[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(2): 232-239.
[5] 钱肖峰. 西部工区超深井段固井封隔完整性保障技术研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2023.
[6] 赵新波, 韩生超, 杨秀娟, 等. 热固耦合作用下的套管-水泥环-地层多层组合系统应力分析[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 48(3): 837-843.
[7] 曾秦涛, 何霞, 张林锋, 等. 海上9-5/8"套管-水泥环界面脱黏行为数值模拟[J]. 应用力学学报, 2026, 43(2): 376-386.
[8] 安峰辰, 苗智博, 孟思炜, 等. 基于地层成拱效应的水泥环对套管应力影响规律研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2024, 52(12): 64-71.
[9] 杨焕强, 王凯, 蔡萌, 等. 基于连续损伤力学的水泥环疲劳损伤规律[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(5): 977-993.
[10] 石鲁杰. 页岩气水平井水泥环封隔能力评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2020.
[11] Wu, X., Li, Z., Hou, Z., Liu, J., Huang, S., Su, D., et al. (2024) Analytical Perspectives on Cement Sheath Integrity: A Comprehensive Review of Theoretical Research. ACS Omega, 9, 17741-17759.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c00475
[12] 林元华, 邓宽海, 易浩, 等. 强交变热载荷下页岩气井水泥环完整性测试[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(5): 81-88.
[13] 周浪, 曾青松, 汪传磊, 等. 地下储气库注采井不同井段水泥环密封性能实验[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(5): 104-108.
[14] 胡志强, 杨进, 刘书杰, 等. 基于套管-水泥环-地层热固耦合作用的多层套管环空附加压力预测模型[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2018, 39(8): 1824-1832.
[15] 刘硕琼, 李德旗, 袁进平, 等. 页岩气井水泥环完整性研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2017, 37(7): 76-82.
[16] 苏东华, 黄盛, 李早元, 等. 页岩油水平井压裂水泥环力学性能设计方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(4): 798-805.
[17] 郭辛阳, 宋雨媛, 步玉环, 等. 基于损伤力学变内压条件下水泥环密封完整性模拟[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(11): 1425-1433.
[18] 陈思成, 马思佳, 等. 注入井射孔段水泥环密封失效数值模拟研究[J]. 化工机械, 2024, 51(2): 252-259.
[19] 吴宇萌, 许明标, 宋建建, 等. 碳纤维与胶乳液协同作用对固井水泥浆力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(1): 253-258, 264.