“(X)实在是”负面评价的规约化研究
A Study on the Conventionalization of Negative Evaluation in “(X) Shí Zài Shì”
DOI: 10.12677/cnc.2026.144138, PDF,   
作者: 刘明天:新疆师范大学中国语言文学学院,新疆 乌鲁木齐
关键词: 实在是负面评价规约化Shí Zài Shì Negative Evaluation Conventionalization
摘要: “实在是”本来是表确认的评判性副词,但是在口语中可以独立使用表达负面立场。本文主要分析了“(x)实在是”的负面评价功能及其形成动因,其负面评价功能主要源于“实在”的主观极量义、语用省略以及回溯推理。同时还分析了其会话序列环境,得出其偏好分布在回应话轮,具有语境依赖。最后对比了“的确是”和“实在是”,同为评判性副词的“的确是”不具有负面评价功能,主要是因为“的确”和“实在”在句法、语义和语用上存在区别。
Abstract: “Shí zài shì” was originally an evaluative adverb expressing confirmation, but in spoken language, it can be used independently to convey a negative stance. This paper primarily analyzes the negative evaluation function of “(x) shí zài shì” and the motivations for its formation. This negative evaluation function mainly originates from the subjective maximal intensity meaning of “shí zài”, pragmatic ellipsis, and abductive inference. The study also examines its conversational sequence environment, revealing that it is preferentially distributed in responsive turns and is context-dependent. Finally, a comparison is made between “dí què shì” and “shí zài shì”. Although both are evaluative adverbs, “dí què shì” does not possess the function of negative evaluation, primarily due to syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic differences between “dí què” and “shí zài”.
文章引用:刘明天. “(X)实在是”负面评价的规约化研究[J]. 国学, 2026, 14(4): 978-984. https://doi.org/10.12677/cnc.2026.144138

参考文献

[1] 方梅, 乐耀. 规约化与立场表达[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2017.
[2] 张谊生. “副 + 是”的历时演化和共时变异——兼论现代汉语“副 + 是”的表达功用和分布范围[J]. 语言科学, 2003, 2(3): 34-49.
[3] 李劲荣. “实在”句的语义格局与句法制约[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2007(2): 40-53+3.
[4] 陈熹. 试论语气副词“实在”的句法、语义、语用[J]. 大理学院学报, 2008(1): 24-26.
[5] 杨雪梅. 副词“实在”的语义分析及教学应用[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2012, 26(1): 124-132.
[6] 李小军. 表负面评价的语用省略——以构式“(X)真是(的)”和“这/那个 + 人名”为例[J]. 当代修辞学, 2011(4): 35-42.
[7] 方梅. 负面评价表达的规约化[J]. 中国语文, 2017(2): 131-147+254.
[8] 张凯倩. 语气副词“的确” “确实” “实在”的比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 徐州: 江苏师范大学, 2020.