眉山市中医医院2024~2025年百日咳流行病学与临床特征分析
Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Pertussis in Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Meishan from 2024 to 2025
DOI: 10.12677/hjbm.2026.164080, PDF,   
作者: 李吟雪, 邹 颖, 刘于玉, 张艳娇*:眉山市中医医院检验科,四川 眉山
关键词: 百日咳流行病学临床特征Pertussis Epidemiology Clinical Characteristics
摘要: 目的:分析眉山市中医医院百日咳流行病学与临床特征,为临床鉴别诊断和规范治疗提供科学依据。方法:回顾性分析2024年1月至2025年10月眉山市中医医院收治的0~75周岁疑似百日咳感染患者,通过实时荧光定量PCR技术检测百日咳杆菌,运用GraphPad Prism 10.4.2统计学软件分析检测结果,探究百日咳杆菌阳性检出率在不同年龄、发病时间等维度的分布及临床特征。结果:疑似百日咳病例495例,实验室确诊89例,阳性率17.98%,门诊病例占76.40%,住院病例占23.60%,无重症和死亡病例;确诊病例以2024年最多(94.38%),男性占48.31%、女性占51.69%,确诊高峰期为6~7月(75.28%),以2~9岁组确诊最多(86.52%),P < 0.05。不同年龄组百日咳的阳性率整体具有显著差异,其阳性率分别为0~1岁组4.41% (3/68)、2~9岁组20.37% (77/378)、10~18岁组16.67% (6/36)、19~59岁组23.08% (3/13)。百日咳阳性人群阵发性痉挛性咳嗽、肺炎、呕吐、面部潮红、发绀的发生率显著升高(P < 0.001),而发烧的发生率显著降低(P < 0.001),在流涕、胸闷胸痛、呼吸困难及病程15天以上的差异无统计学意义。阳性人群WBC、NEU、LYM、PLT计数水平均显著高于阴性组(P < 0.05),其中WBC的差异最为显著(P < 0.0001),C反应蛋白(CRP)水平无显著统计学差异。结论:学龄期儿童为百日咳感染的高危人群,且发病具有时间规律性,相关部门需针对高危人群强化百日咳疫苗接种工作,结合发病时间规律开展季节性防控。实时荧光定量PCR技术具有灵敏度高、特异性强、检测耗时短等优势,普及分子检测技术可实现百日咳的快速诊断,以降低发病率。因此,识别百日咳流行病学和临床特征并联合多指标检测有助于在床旁实现早期鉴别诊断,从而制定更具针对性的临床管理方案。
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of pertussis in Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Meishan, and to provide a scientific basis for clinical differential diagnosis and standardized treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on suspected pertussis-infected patients aged 0 - 75 years admitted to Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Meishan from January 2024 to October 2025. Bordetella pertussis was detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR, and the results were statistically analyzed using GraphPad Prism 10.4.2 software. The distribution of positive detection rates across different age groups, onset time, and other dimensions, as well as the clinical features, was investigated. Results: Among 495 suspected pertussis cases, 89 were laboratory-confirmed, yielding a positive rate of 17.98%. Outpatient cases accounted for 76.40% and inpatient cases for 23.60%; no severe or fatal cases were observed. The majority of confirmed cases occurred in 2024 (94.38%), with males comprising 48.31% and females 51.69%. The peak incidence occurred from June to July (75.28%), and the 2 - 9 years age group had the highest number of confirmed cases (86.52%) (P < 0.05). The overall positive rate differed significantly among age groups: 4.41% (3/68) in the 0 - 1 year group, 20.37%(77/378) in the 2 - 9 years group, 16.67% (6/36) in the 10 - 18 years group, and 23.08% (3/13) in the 19 - 59 years group. The incidence rates of paroxysmal spasmodic cough, pneumonia, vomiting, facial flushing, and cyanosis were significantly higher in pertussis positive patients (P < 0.001), whereas fever incidence was significantly lower (P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in rhinorrhea, chest tightness and pain, dyspnea, or disease duration exceeding 15 days. The counts of WBC, NEU, LYM, and PLT in the positive group were all significantly higher than those in the negative group (P < 0.05), with WBC showing the most pronounced difference (P < 0.0001); no significant difference was observed in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Conclusions: School-age children are at high risk of pertussis infection, and the incidence follows a temporal pattern. Relevant authorities should strengthen pertussis vaccination targeting high-risk populations and implement seasonal prevention and control measures based on the incidence pattern. Real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR offers high sensitivity, strong specificity, and short detection time; popularizing molecular detection technology enables rapid diagnosis of pertussis and reduces morbidity. Therefore, recognizing the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of pertussis combined with multi-index detection facilitates early bedside differential diagnosis, allowing for more targeted clinical management strategies.
文章引用:李吟雪, 邹颖, 刘于玉, 张艳娇. 眉山市中医医院2024~2025年百日咳流行病学与临床特征分析[J]. 生物医学, 2026, 16(4): 784-793. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjbm.2026.164080

参考文献

[1] 中华预防医学会, 中华预防医学会疫苗与免疫分会. 中国百日咳行动计划专家共识[J]. 中国疫苗和免疫, 2021, 27(3): 317-327.
[2] 姚开虎, 邓继岿, 热夏提·达吾提. 百日咳诊断: 现行标准的局限性和GPI建议[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2016, 18(9): 891-896.
[3] Etskovitz, H., Anastasio, N., Green, E. and May, M. (2019) Role of Evolutionary Selection Acting on Vaccine Antigens in the Re-Emergence of Bordetella Pertussis. Diseases, 7, Article No. 35.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases7020035
[4] van der Zee, A., Schellekens, J.F.P. and Mooi, F.R. (2015) Laboratory Diagnosis of Pertussis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 28, 1005-1026.
https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00031-15
[5] Chen, Z., Zhang, J., Cao, L., Zhang, N., Zhu, J., Ping, G., et al. (2016) Seroprevalence of Pertussis among Adults in China Where Whole Cell Vaccines Have Been Used for 50 Years. Journal of Infection, 73, 38-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2016.04.004
[6] 王青, 刘莹, 袁林, 等. 实时荧光定量聚合酶链式反应检测百日咳鲍特菌的效能研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(23): 2815-2819.
[7] 苏泽, 伊洁, 孔令君, 等. 百日咳杆菌核酸检测试剂性能的综合评价与剖析[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2026, 33(1): 133-138.
[8] 吴丹遐, 杨火英, 周树平, 等. 呼吸道感染患儿百日咳感染状况分析[J]. 江西医药, 2023, 58(2): 206-207+213.
[9] 徐蕊, 葛为民, 杨恒丹, 等. 平顶山市2005-2019年学龄前和学龄儿童百日咳流行病学特征分析[J]. 医学动物防制, 2021, 37(10): 939-942.
[10] 董利利, 赵二要, 汤昱, 等. 学龄前百日咳综合征患儿病原学及临床特征分析[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2021, 37(10): 1702-1705.
[11] 李文豪. 深圳市百日咳流行特征及学龄前儿童疫苗保护效果评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 暨南大学, 2022.
[12] Xue, M., Wei, X., Wang, B., Liu, M., Zhang, Y. and Ma, X. (2026) Clinical Characteristics Analysis of Pertussis and Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection in Children. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 16, Article ID: 1711371.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2026.1711371
[13] Liu, M., Wei, X., Sun, J., Liu, Y., Cheng, L., Han, Y., et al. (2025) Molecular Epidemiological Characteristics of Pertussis in a Pediatric Hospital in Jinan City, China, 2022 to 2024. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, Article ID: 1657953.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1657953
[14] Decker, M.D. and Edwards, K.M. (2021) Pertussis (Whooping Cough). Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health, 66, 703-704.
[15] Huang, H.T., Gao, Z.G., Liu, Y., et al. (2017) Epidemiological Characteristics and Risk Factors of the Pertussis in Infants < 12 Months of Age in Tianjin, China. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 30, 545-548.
[16] 张国平, 郭玉婷, 刘莹, 等. 2010-2024年天津市百日咳流行特征及时空聚集性分析[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2025, 59(11): 1867-1872.
[17] 宁宁, 罗淑兰, 丁国标. 551例小儿百日咳综合征的临床回顾性分析[J]. 当代医学, 2019, 25(25): 177-178.
[18] 王文建, 陈杰华, 郑跃杰. 小儿百日咳感染58例临床分析[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2013, 31(8): 483-485.
[19] 许华山, 陈凤英, 吴俊峰. 117例小儿百日咳住院病例临床特征及治疗分析[J]. 实用药物与临床, 2025, 28(12): 918-922.
[20] 李翠彤, 黄玉芬, 向宇俊. 83例慢性咳嗽患儿百日咳感染情况临床分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2022, 37(20): 3781-3784.
[21] 李爽. 2018-2024年中国北方地区百日咳的多中心流行病学调查与临床特征分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2025.
[22] 高强. 基于临床辅助检查的儿童百日咳诊断模型构建及验证研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 泸州: 西南医科大学, 2024.
[23] 张红, 黄基红, 林乐, 等. 温州市684例6岁以下儿童百日咳疑似病例确诊情况分析[J]. 实用预防医学, 2023, 30(12): 1513-1515.