AI时代下批判性思维的研究热点和趋势：基于CiteSpace的可视化分析
Research Hotspots and Trends in Critical Thinking in the AI Era: Visual Analysis Based on CiteSpace
摘要: 目的：近年来，AI技术的快速发展对批判性思维水平提出了更高的要求，本研究旨在对梳理当前批判性思维研究情况和特点，为后续培养批判性思维提供参考指导。方法：使用CiteSpace对Web of Science核心数据库中2022年~2026年的491篇相关文献进行计量和可视化分析。结果：(1) 当前批判性思维研究尚未形成紧密的合作网络，该领域主要以探索有效的培养和干预策略为重点，但未形成统一的概念框架和评估标准，且对教学策略的关注相对单一；(2) 当前批判性思维研究主题可分为：干预和培养策略、在学科中的具体应用、影响因素、测量与评估工具开发四个方面，其中各研究主题皆对AI相关议题有所涉及；(3) 将批判性思维培养策略与先进技术工具相结合以及进一步探讨在AI背景下，学习者批判性思维与AI使用的关系是未来重要研究方向。结论：在未来研究中应以AI发展为背景，对批判性思维的培养路径进行多元探索。
Abstract: Objective: In recent years, the rapid development of AI technology has placed higher demands on the level of critical thinking. This study aims to sort out the current research status and characteristics of critical thinking and provide reference guidance for the subsequent cultivation of critical thinking. Methods: CiteSpace was used to conduct quantitative and visual analysis on 491 relevant articles from the Web of Science core database from 2022 to 2026. Results: (1) Current research on critical thinking has not yet formed a close collaborative network. The field mainly focuses on exploring effective cultivation and intervention strategies, but has not formed a unified conceptual framework and evaluation standards, and the focus on teaching strategies is relatively singular; (2) Current research topics on critical thinking can be divided into four aspects: intervention and cultivation strategies, specific applications in disciplines, influencing factors, and the development of measurement and evaluation tools. Each research topic involves AI-related issues; (3) Combining critical thinking cultivation strategies with advanced technological tools and further exploring the relationship between learners' critical thinking and AI use in the context of AI are important research directions for the future. Conclusion: In future research, we should explore the cultivation path of critical thinking in a diversified way with the background of AI development.
文章引用：曹瑜, 郑敏晓, 翁小丽, 朱棋显, 刘雨菲, 朱冬梅. AI时代下批判性思维的研究热点和趋势：基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(7): 737-746. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.147566

参考文献

[1] Facione, P.A. (1990) The DelPhi Report: Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. The California Academic Press.
[2] 蔡颖蔚, 陈茁. 双刃之剑: 生成式人工智能对大学生批判性思维的影响[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 64(6): 146-159.
[3] 申灵灵, 何丽萍. 人工智能时代技术与教育共生的困局与出路[J]. 高教探索, 2021(9): 13-18.
[4] 段世飞, 钱跳跳. ChatGPT浪潮下的高阶能力培养: 可为、难为、何为? [J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 26(4): 80-88.
[5] 韩媛媛. 生成式人工智能背景下大学生批判性思维培养: 价值、挑战与策略[J]. 高等继续教育学报, 2025, 38(3): 29-38.
[6] Chen, C. (2005) CiteSpace II: Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scientific Literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 359-377.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
[7] Fan, K. and See, B.H. (2022) How Do Chinese Students’ Critical Thinking Compare with Other Students? A Structured Review of the Existing Evidence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, Article ID: 101145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101145
[8] Liu, Y. and Pásztor, A. (2022) Effects of Problem-Based Learning Instructional Intervention on Critical Thinking in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, Article ID: 101069.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101069
[9] Walter, Y. (2024) Embracing the Future of Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom: The Relevance of AI Literacy, Prompt Engineering, and Critical Thinking in Modern Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article No. 15.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
[10] Anggraeni, D.M., Prahani, B.K., Suprapto, N., Shofiyah, N. and Jatmiko, B. (2023) Systematic Review of Problem Based Learning Research in Fostering Critical Thinking Skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, Article ID: 101334.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101334
[11] Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A. and Fabio, R.A. (2025) Student Interaction with ChatGPT Can Promote Complex Critical Thinking Skills. Learning and Instruction, 95, Article ID: 102011.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011
[12] Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., et al. (2023) Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11, Article 54.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
[13] Yuan, R., Liao, W., Wang, Z., Kong, J. and Zhang, Y. (2022) How Do English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) Teachers Perceive and Engage with Critical Thinking: A Systematic Review from 2010 to 2020. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, Article ID: 101002.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101002
[14] Altun, E. and Yildirim, N. (2023) What Does Critical Thinking Mean? Examination of Pre-Service Teachers’ Cognitive Structures and Definitions for Critical Thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, Article ID: 101367.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101367
[15] 丁学东. 文献计量学基础[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1993: 220-232.
[16] 尹猛, 窦芬. 近十年来内隐理论领域的可视化研究——基于CiteSpace的分析[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 64(1): 120-127, 155-156.
[17] 冷静, 路晓旭. 批判性思维真的可教吗?——基于79篇实验或准实验研究的元分析[J]. 开放教育研究, 2020, 26(6): 110-118.
[18] 金石, 王璐露, 宛敏. 线上线下混合式教学的反思与策略优化[J]. 中国大学教学, 2022(11): 72-77.
[19] 黄荣怀, 刘德建, 阿罕默德∙提利利, 等. 人机协同教学: 基于虚拟化身、数字孪生和教育机器人场景的路径设计[J]. 开放教育研究, 2023, 29(6): 4-14.

为你推荐