家校协同下小学生集体责任感的现状、内涵与培育路径
The Current Situation, Connotation and Cultivation Path of Primary School Students’ Collective Sense of Responsibility under Home-School Collaboration
摘要: 小学生集体责任感的培养是落实立德树人根本任务的重要环节。然而,当前家校协同在集体责任感培育中存在目标错位、沟通浅层化、要求不一致等突出问题。本文以班杜拉观察学习理论与布朗芬布伦纳生态系统理论为双重理论基础,对小学生集体责任感的内涵进行理论重构。在梳理小学生集体责任感现状、内涵与困境的基础上,提出“双情境协同”培育路径。包含家校双向榜样示范、家校强化标准一致性建设、双情境自我效能感培养、家校协同沟通制度四项核心策略。本文的核心论点是——家校双方在榜样供给、强化标准与效能信息上的协同一致,是强化经验能否转化为内在责任动机的关键边界条件。通过双情境的协同运作,使儿童的观察学习机会最大化、强化经验一致化以及效能信息多渠道化。
Abstract: The cultivation of collective responsibility among primary school students is an important link in implementing the fundamental task of fostering virtue and nurturing talent. However, at present, there are prominent problems such as misaligned goals, superficial communication and inconsistent requirements in the cultivation of collective sense of responsibility through home-school collaboration. This paper, based on the dual theoretical foundations of Bandura’s observational learning theory and Brown-Fin-Brenner’s ecosystem theory, conducts a theoretical reconstruction of the connotation of collective responsibility among primary school students. Based on a review of the current situation, connotation and predicament of primary school students’ sense of collective responsibility, a “dual-scenario synergy” cultivation path is proposed. It includes four core strategies: two-way exemplary demonstration between home and school, strengthening the construction of standard consistency between home and school, cultivating self-efficacy in dual scenarios, and establishing a home-school collaborative communication system. The core argument of this article is that the consistency between home and school in terms of role model supply, reinforcement standards and effectiveness information is the key boundary condition for whether reinforcement experience can be transformed into intrinsic responsibility motivation. Through the collaborative operation of dual scenarios, children’s opportunities for observational learning are maximized, experience consistency is strengthened, and multi-channel information on effectiveness is utilized.
文章引用:王曼嘉. 家校协同下小学生集体责任感的现状、内涵与培育路径[J]. 职业教育发展, 2026, 15(8): 8-16. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2026.158311

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 义务教育道德与法治课程标准(2022年版) [M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2022: 51.
[2] Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, 47-105.
[3] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press, 22-26.
https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028845
[4] 刘杰, 孟会敏. 关于布郎芬布伦纳发展心理学生态系统理论[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2009, 17(2): 250-252.
[5] 李伯黍, 岑国桢, 叶慧珍, 等. 小学儿童集体观念发展研究[J]. 心理科学通讯, 1985(1): 13-17, 65.
[6] 张慕蕴, 哈斯. 蒙古族儿童公有观念发展的实验研究[J]. 内蒙古师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 1985(4): 116-122.
[7] 顾承厘, 唐惠英. 儿童班级责任感培养的研究[J]. 上海教育科研, 1990(5): 37, 23.
[8] 李军成. 浅谈班集体中小学生责任感的培养[J]. 甘肃教育, 2007(16): 13-14.
[9] 黄四林, 林崇德. 社会责任素养的内涵与结构[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(1): 27-33.
[10] 柯燕妮. 小学心理健康教育课堂中集体责任素养的培养[J]. 中小学心理健康教育, 2021(13): 29-30, 34.
[11] 刘涵婧. 岗位责任制: 小学生责任感培养的家校协同实践[J]. 江苏教育, 2021(92): 60-61.
[12] 李宝玉. 学生集体责任感培养的理论对标、边界及路径[J]. 江苏教育, 2023(12): 42-44.
[13] 黄河清. 家庭教育与学校教育的比较研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2002, 20(2): 28-34, 58.
[14] 赵凯. 小学生学校责任感的结构及问卷编制[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 济南大学, 2020.
[15] 班杜拉. 社会学习理论[M]. 陈欣银, 李伯黍, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015.
[16] 唐卫海, 杨孟萍. 简评班杜拉的社会学习理论[J]. 天津师大学报(社会科学版), 1996(5): 30-35.
[17] Bandura, A. (1977) Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191