老龄社会的数字化治理协同问题研究
Research on Collaborative Digital Governance Issues in an Aging Society
摘要: 随着我国步入深度老龄社会,数字化技术的快速渗透为老龄社会治理带来了机遇与挑战。本文系统分析了我国老龄社会数字化治理的现状、困境及其成因,并借鉴德国、日本、美国、英国等域外经验。研究发现:我国已初步形成“数字 + 养老”“数字 + 政务”“数字 + 医疗”的发展格局,相关政策与行业规范逐步完善,多元治理主体协同发力,但仍面临政策体系不完善、社会监督机制不健全、求助渠道不畅、数字鸿沟突出等突出问题。究其原因,包括政策滞后、监督能力不足、社会支持资源配置不合理及社会观念偏差等。为此,本文提出完善专门性政策、强化社会监督、畅通求助渠道、构建多元协同治理体系、提升老年人数字素养等路径,旨在保障老年人在数字社会中的平等参与,推动构建老龄友好型数字社会。
Abstract: As China enters a deeply aging society, the rapid penetration of digital technologies has brought both opportunities and challenges to the governance of an aging society. From a sociological perspective, this paper systematically analyzes the current situation, dilemmas, and causes of digital governance in China’s aging society, drawing on the experiences of countries such as Germany, Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The study finds that China has initially formed a development pattern of “digital + elderly care,” “digital + government affairs,” and “digital + healthcare.” Relevant policies and industry standards are gradually improving, and multiple governance actors are working in coordination. However, it still faces prominent problems such as an incomplete policy system, inadequate social supervision mechanisms, poor access to help channels, and a pronounced digital divide. The causes include policy lag, insufficient supervisory capacity, irrational allocation of social support resources, and deviations in social concepts. To this end, this paper proposes pathways such as improving specialized policies, strengthening social supervision, smoothing help channels, building a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance system, and enhancing the digital literacy of older adults, aiming to ensure the equal participation of older adults in the digital society and promote the construction of an agefriendly digital society.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
迟煦. 产业界齐努力帮助老年人缩小“数字鸿沟” [J]. 通信世界, 2020(32): 5-6.
|
|
[2]
|
王一然, 赵廼龙. 万物互联时代居家适老化改造研究[J]. 设计, 2021, 34(13): 52-55.
|
|
[3]
|
李熠煜, 杨旭, 孟凡坤. 从“堕距”到“融合”: 社会“智”理何以“适老化”? [J]. 学术探索, 2021(8): 96-103.
|
|
[4]
|
汤资岚. 数字时代社会“智”理适老化趋向[J]. 行政与法, 2021(11): 78-86.
|
|
[5]
|
杨晓舒, 刘李甜. 人口老龄化背景下智慧养老服务的现状与发展[J]. 科技资讯, 2021, 19(34): 177-179.
|
|
[6]
|
谢智敏, 陈强. 人口高质量发展背景下老年教育的德国经验及中国借鉴[J]. 德国研究, 2025, 40(5): 124-145.
|
|
[7]
|
文婧. 日本的养老服务模式及其经验教训[J]. 特区经济, 2020(1): 86-89.
|
|
[8]
|
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC). White Paper 2022: Information and Communications in Japan. https://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/whitepaper/eng/WP2022/2022-index.html
|
|
[9]
|
赵宁. 银发经济背景下美国养老服务业发展的政策导向及其启示[J]. 社会保障研究, 2025(1): 77-86.
|
|
[10]
|
Sloane, M., Moss, E., Awomolo, O., et al. (2023) Algorithmic Accountability: Moving Beyond Audits. AI Now Institute. https://ainowinstitute.org/publications/algorithmic-accountability
|
|
[11]
|
柴化敏. 英国养老服务体系: 经验和发展[J]. 社会政策研究, 2018(3): 79-96.
|
|
[12]
|
Barclays PLC Public Policy Report (2023) Digital Eagles: Building Digital Confidence in Local Communities. https://home.barclays/content/dam/home-barclays/documents/investor-relations/reports-and-events/annual-reports/2023/Barclays-PLC-Annual-Report-2023.pdf
|
|
[13]
|
董立人. 人工智能发展与政府治理创新研究[J]. 天津行政学院学报, 2018, 20(3): 3-10.
|
|
[14]
|
张博, 韩俊江. 人口老龄化背景下发展智慧养老产业研究[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 35(4): 125-128.
|
|
[15]
|
孟天广, 赵娟. 大数据驱动的智能化社会治理: 理论建构与治理体系[J]. 电子政务, 2018(8): 1-11.
|
|
[16]
|
刁生富, 刁宏宇, 吴选红. 大数据时代智慧养老服务模式比较分析[J]. 山东科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 20(6): 104-112.
|
|
[17]
|
赵雅丹, 孙铭鸿, 郭成博. 智慧养老服务产业发展路径研究[J]. 中国商论, 2019(15): 220-221.
|