企业自愿信息披露策略的三维分析框架研究——以新能源汽车行业销量披露为例
A Three-Dimensional Analytical Framework for Firms’ Voluntary Information Disclosure Strategies—Evidence from Sales Disclosures in the New Energy Vehicle Industry
摘要: 企业自愿信息披露在降低信息不对称的同时也包含策略选择空间。本文以X公司汽车销量披露中出现的“反向少报”(披露“3万+”而实际为36,705辆)现象为切入点,对比比亚迪、理想、蔚来、小鹏等同业披露实践,基于信号传递理论、印象管理理论和预期管理理论,整合构建了“净收益预期–法律责任风险–管理层偏好”的三维分析框架,旨在探究企业自愿信息披露策略的决策机制。本文研究发现:企业自愿披露策略并非单纯基于利好信号传递,而是受到市场地位、合规成本与管理层偏好等多重因素的综合影响。X公司选择非正式渠道与模糊区间披露,体现了新进入者在法律安全边际与披露灵活性之间的理性权衡,同时也反映出管理层路径依赖与预期管理偏好的深刻烙印。本文为理解上市公司差异化披露行为提供了新的分析视角,并从企业治理、监管完善和投资者解读三个层面提出建议。
Abstract: Voluntary corporate information disclosure can mitigate information asymmetry yet leaves room for strategic decision-making. Taking the phenomenon of “conservative under-reporting” (stating “30,000+ units” while the actual volume stood at 36,705) in X Company’s automobile sales disclosure as an entry point, this paper compares disclosure practices of BYD, Li Auto, NIO and XPeng, and constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework covering “net benefit expectation, legal liability risk and management preference” based on signaling theory, impression management theory and expectation management theory, aiming to explore the decision-making mechanism of corporate voluntary information disclosure strategies. The study finds that enterprises’ voluntary disclosure strategies are not merely based on transmitting favorable signals, but comprehensively shaped by multiple factors including market position, compliance costs and management preferences. X Company’s adoption of informal channels and vague range disclosure reflects rational trade-offs made by new market entrants between legal safety margins and disclosure flexibility, while also bearing profound marks of management path dependence and earnings guidance preferences. This paper provides a new analytical perspective for understanding differentiated disclosure behaviors of listed companies, and puts forward suggestions from three dimensions: corporate governance, regulatory improvement and investor interpretation.
文章引用:邓河. 企业自愿信息披露策略的三维分析框架研究——以新能源汽车行业销量披露为例[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2026, 15(4): 833-839. https://doi.org/10.12677/fia.2026.154086

参考文献

[1] 陈洁. 证券市场自愿信息披露的规制[J]. 社会科学文摘, 2025(11): 106-108.
[2] 刘银国, 徐庆. 自愿信息披露、企业成长性与财务绩效[J]. 吉林工商学院学报, 2022, 38(3): 30-36.
[3] 高明华, 刘波波. 自愿信息披露对企业技术创新的影响路径分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(4): 69-79.
[4] 方重. 上市公司自愿信息披露监管[J]. 中国金融, 2021(9): 43-45.
[5] 韩佩君. 企业自愿信息披露决策机理研究——以京东方为例[J]. 财会通讯, 2021(19): 101-105.
[6] 林斌, 饶静. 上市公司为什么自愿披露内部控制鉴证报告?——基于信号传递理论的实证研究[J]. 会计研究, 2009(2): 45-52+93-94.
[7] 赵敏. 上市公司自愿性信息披露中的印象管理行为分析[J]. 当代财经, 2007(3): 117-119.
[8] 查睿敏. ESG披露中印象管理对会计信息透明度的影响研究[J]. 市场周刊, 2026, 39(16): 116-120.
[9] 程强, 陈梦洁. 预期管理对资本市场的影响[C]//中国证券业高质量发展论文集(2025). 北京: 中国财经出版传媒集团、中国财政经济出版社, 2025: 482-489.
[10] 李四海, 李震. 上市公司财务报告与社会责任报告组合披露策略[J]. 经济管理, 2024, 46(9): 125-146.