自评健康对居民亲环境行为的作用机制研究——污染感知的中介效应
The Mechanism of Self-Rated Health on Residents’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors—The Mediating Effect of Pollution Perception
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.168371, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张 彤：广州商学院经济学院，广东 广州；广州商学院数字经济研究中心，广东 广州；梁菲菲*：广州商学院经济学院，广东 广州
关键词: 自评健康；亲环境行为；环保行动；污染感知；中介效应；CGSS2021；Self-Rated Health； Pro-Environmental Behavior； Environmental Protection Actions； Pollution Perception； Mediating Effect； CGSS2021
摘要: 为探究健康状况影响居民亲环境行为的内在传导机制，本文基于环境认知行为理论，构建自评健康通过污染感知影响居民环保行动的中介模型。研究采用中国综合社会调查CGSS2021微观数据，运用结构方程模型(SEM)与Bootstrap法开展实证检验。研究结果发现居民自评健康得分高者对环境污染的感知敏感度较高，即认为各种污染对环境危害较为严重，污染感知进一步对环保行动存在显著正向作用，即自评健康通过污染感知间接作用于居民亲环境行为。研究明晰了个体健康促进居民最终落实环保行动的传导逻辑，丰富了亲环境行为前因变量的研究体系，也为从居民健康视角开展生态环境宣传、引导公众绿色行为提供实证参考。
Abstract: To explore how health status affects residents’ pro-environmental behaviors, this study, based on the cognitive behavior theory, constructs a mediating structural model of self-rated health status influencing environmental protection behaviors through pollution perception. Using the 2021 CGSS data, the structural equation model (SEM) and the bootstrap method are employed for empirical testing. The results show that residents with higher self-rated health scores are more sensitive to the consequences of environmental pollution, that is, they believe that various pollution factors have a more severe impact on the environment. Pollution perception further prompted residents to take environmental protection actions. Self-rated health indirectly influenced residents’ environmental protection behaviors through pollution perception. This study discovered the transmission path from personal health to the final implementation of environmental protection actions, proving that individuals may take environmental protection actions based on their own interests, and providing empirical references for ecological environment publicity from the perspective of residents’ health and guiding public green behaviors.
文章引用：张彤, 梁菲菲 (2026). 自评健康对居民亲环境行为的作用机制研究——污染感知的中介效应. 心理学进展, 16(8), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.168371

参考文献

[1] 曹洪军, 王小洁, 刘鹏程(2017). 居民应对环保知行不一的认知策略及其原因——基于CGSS2010微观数据的分析. 城市问题, (1), 85-94.
[2] 陈强强(2023). 重点生态功能区农牧民草原保护的生态认知, 意愿与形成机制——基于TPB与VBN整合模型. 干旱区资源与环境, 37(2), 34-41.
[3] 池上新, 陈诚, 许英(2017). 环境关心与环保支付意愿: 政府信任的调节效应——兼论环境治理的困境. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 17(5), 72-79.
[4] 龚文娟, 彭远春, 孙敏(2022). 母亲身份、社会交往、环境污染感知与中国母亲群体的环境行为. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 22(1), 22-36.
[5] 何兴邦(2016). 社会互动与公众环保行为——基于CGSS(2013)的经验分析. 软科学, 30(4), 98-100.
[6] 黄雪丽, 路正南, & Wang, A. Y. (2013). 基于TPB和VBN的低碳旅游生活行为影响因素研究模型构建初探. 科技管理研究, 33(21), 181-190.
[7] 贾亚娟, 赵敏娟(2022). 环境污染感知对农村居民生活垃圾源头分类意愿的影响——兼论责任意识的中介效应. 江苏大学学报: 社会科学版, 24(4), 54-65+124.
[8] 卢少云(2017). 公民自愿主义, 大众传媒与公共环保行为——基于中国CGSS2013数据的实证分析. 公共行政评论, 10(5), 69-85+217.
[9] 芦慧, 刘严, 邹佳星, 陈红, 龙如银(2020). 多重动机对中国居民亲环境行为的交互影响. 中国人口∙资源与环境, 30(11), 160-169.
[10] 宋金昭, 陈丽(2023). 互联网使用对城镇居民亲环境行为的影响——基于社会资本的中介效应检验. 经营与管理, (7), 147-154.
[11] 王建明, 吴龙昌(2015). 亲环境行为研究中情感的类别、维度及其作用机理. 心理科学进展, 23(12), 2153-2166.
[12] 王玉君, 韩冬临(2016). 经济发展、环境污染与公众环保行为——基于中国CGSS2013数据的多层分析. 中国人民大学学报, 30(2), 79-92.
[13] 叶托, 黄雅玲(2025). 公众感知如何影响居民参与生活垃圾分类意愿?——基于CGSS2021数据的实证研究. 长白学刊, (4), 47-61.
[14] 余真真, 田浩(2017). 亲环境行为研究的新路径: 情理合一. 心理研究, 10(3), 41-47.
[15] 张庆鹏, 康凯(2016). 社会心理学视角下的亲环境行为探讨. 广州大学学报: 社会科学版, 15(2), 28-38.
[16] 周全, 汤书昆(2017). 媒介使用与中国公众的亲环境行为: 环境知识与环境风险感知的多重中介效应分析. 中国地质大学学报: 社会科学版, 17(5), 80-94.
[17] Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
[18] Castellini, G., Acampora, M., Provenzi, L., Cagliero, L., Lucini, L., & Barello, S. (2023). Health Consciousness and Pro-Environmental Behaviors in an Italian Representative Sample: A Cross-Sectional Study. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 8846.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35969-w
[19] Colombo, S. L., Chiarella, S. G., Lefrançois, C., Fradin, J., Raffone, A., & Simione, L. (2023). Why Knowing about Climate Change Is Not Enough to Change: A Perspective Paper on the Factors Explaining the Environmental Knowledge-Action Gap. Sustainability, 15, Article No. 14859.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014859
[20] Csutora, M. (2012). One More Awareness Gap? The Behaviour-Impact Gap Problem. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35, 145-163.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-012-9187-8
[21] de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior: How to Measure Egoistic, Altruistic, and Biospheric Value Orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40, 330-354.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831
[22] Farrow, K., Grolleau, G., & Ibanez, L. (2017). Social Norms and Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence. Ecological Economics, 140, 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017
[23] Fornara, F., Molinario, E., & Scopelliti, M. (2020). Health Concerns as Extended Antecedents in VBN Framework Predicting Sustainable Consumption. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article ID: 578582.
[24] Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and Social Factors That Influence Pro-Environmental Concern and Behaviour: A Review. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 141-157.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
[25] Gökşen, F., Adaman, F., & Zenginobuz, E. Ü. (2002). On Environmental Concern, Willingness to Pay, and Postmaterialist Values: Evidence from Istanbul. Environment and Behavior, 34, 616-633.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005003
[26] Hernández-Alemán, A., Cruz-Pérez, N., & Santamarta, J. C. (2024). The Average Direct, Indirect and Total Effects of Environmental Concern on Pro-Environmental Behavior. Land, 13, Article No. 1229.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081229
[27] Li, X., Zhang, D., Zhang, T., Ji, Q., & Lucey, B. (2021). Awareness, Energy Consumption and Pro-Environmental Choices of Chinese Households. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, Article ID: 123734.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123734
[28] Martin, L., White, M. P., Hunt, A., Richardson, M., Pahl, S., & Burt, J. (2020). Nature Contact, Nature Connectedness and Associations with Health, Wellbeing and Pro-Environmental Behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, Article ID: 101389.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389
[29] Michel-Guillou, E., & Moser, G. (2006). Commitment of Farmers to Environmental Protection: From Social Pressure to Environmental Conscience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 227-235.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.07.004
[30] Prati, G., Albanesi, C., & Pietrantoni, L. (2017). The Interplay among Environmental Attitudes, Pro-Environmental Behavior, Social Identity, and Pro-Environmental Institutional Climate. A Longitudinal Study. Environmental Education Research, 23, 176-191.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1118752
[31] Stern, P. C. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
[32] Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-97.
[33] Tam, K., & Chan, H. (2017). Environmental Concern Has a Weaker Association with Pro-Environmental Behavior in Some Societies than Others: A Cross-Cultural Psychology Perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 213-223.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.001
[34] Vesely, S., Klöckner, C. A., & Brick, C. (2020). Pro-Environmental Behavior as a Signal of Cooperativeness: Evidence from a Social Dilemma Experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, Article ID: 101362.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101362
[35] Zhou, Z., Liu, J., Zeng, H., Zhang, T., & Chen, X. (2020). How Does Soil Pollution Risk Perception Affect Farmers’ Pro-Environmental Behavior? The Role of Income Level. Journal of Environmental Management, 270, Article ID: 110806.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110806