积极老龄化视域下老年人意定监护的社会支持体系研究
Research on the Social Support System for Elderly Persons’ Appointed Guardianship from the Perspective of Active Aging
摘要: 我国已进入中度老龄化社会,失能、失智老年人的社会照护与权益保障问题日益突出。意定监护制度作为尊重老年人自我决定权的一项社会政策创新,允许老年人在具备行为能力时预先选定未来的生活照料与财产管理人。然而,该制度在社会实践中面临诸多结构性困境:规定过于原则化,缺乏可操作的社会执行细则;监护人资格与职责边界模糊,社会信任基础薄弱;社会监督机制严重缺失;专业社会监护服务供给不足。这些问题的深层社会成因在于:现行政策忽视了意定监护作为老年人社会福利的社会法定位、监护协议中的实质平等社会关系、以及监护关系所蕴含的社会信任与责任伦理。有鉴于此,应通过出台专项社会政策、强化公证程序与协议示范文本、构建公私协同的双轨制社会监督机制、培育专业社会监护服务组织,并引入社会信任义务理念,系统释放意定监护制度在老年人社会权益保障中的潜能。
Abstract: China has entered a moderately aging society, where issues related to social care and rights protection for disabled and demented elderly individuals are increasingly prominent. The voluntary guardianship system, as an innovative social policy that respects the elderly’s right to self-determination, allows them to pre-select future caregivers and property managers when they possess behavioral capacity. However, this system faces numerous structural challenges in social practice: legal provisions are overly principled and lack operable social enforcement rules; the qualifications and responsibilities of guardians are unclear, and the foundation of social trust is weak; social supervision mechanisms are severely lacking; and the supply of professional social guardianship services is insufficient. The underlying social causes of these issues lie in the current policies neglecting the social law positioning of voluntary guardianship as social welfare for the elderly, the substantive equal social relationships in guardianship agreements, and the social trust and responsibility ethics inherent in guardianship relationships. In view of this, we should systematically unleash the potential of the voluntary guardianship system in safeguarding the social rights of the elderly by introducing special social policies, strengthening notarization procedures and model agreement texts, constructing a dual-track social supervision mechanism with public-private collaboration, cultivating professional social guardianship service organizations, and introducing the concept of social trust obligations.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
任娜, 尹政伟, 何沛涵, 等. 我国老年人监护的现实困境与完善路径研究——基于北京、上海等地的调研[J]. 社会福利, 2024(9): 47-58.
|
|
[2]
|
朱宇. 刍议《民法典》老年人意定监护的立法理念与完善[J]. 南方论刊(社会学专栏), 2021(4): 66-68.
|
|
[3]
|
闫佳, 霍雨琦. 老龄化背景下我国成年意定监护监督制度的完善[J]. 司法警官职业教育研究, 2024, 5(1): 59-65.
|
|
[4]
|
杜鹏. 中国特色积极应对人口老龄化道路: 探索与实践[J]. 行政管理改革, 2022(3): 13-18.
|
|
[5]
|
万方. 我国意定监护制度的社会支持体系设计[J]. 社会政策研究, 2023(4): 76-85.
|
|
[6]
|
颜雅仪. 意定监护制度下养老方式创新路径研究——基于社会支持网络理论[J]. 湘南学院学报(社会学版), 2022, 43(4): 23-29.
|
|
[7]
|
谢立黎, 汪斌. 积极老龄化视野下中国老年人社会参与模式及影响因素[J]. 人口研究, 2019, 43(3): 17-30.
|
|
[8]
|
李德健, 郑燃. 老年人权益保障视角下意定监护制度实施困境与社会破解路径[J]. 人权与老龄化, 2025(4): 97-115.
|
|
[9]
|
李连友, 李磊, 万叶. 积极老龄化视角下老年人隔代抚养与社会参与的角色冲突及调适——基于社会角色理论的分析[J]. 行政管理改革, 2021(5): 71-78.
|
|
[10]
|
冯源. 《民法典》视野下意定监护协议的双重属性及规则调适[J]. 社会学评论, 2026(5): 145-163.
|
|
[11]
|
李萌. 积极老龄化理念下意定监护制度的补足——以信义关系的嵌入为视角[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2025, 62(4): 123-135.
|
|
[12]
|
周婷. 积极老龄化视角下社区老年教育模式探析[J]. 辽宁开放大学学报, 2026(1): 55-58.
|
|
[13]
|
丁建定. 数字赋能与老年参与: 积极老龄化研究的新进展——评《老有所为: 数字化时代老年人社会参与与老年健康》[J]. 人口与健康, 2026(2): 92-94.
|