民事执行实施权社会化的路径探索
Exploring the Path to Socializing the Implementation Power of Civil Execution
摘要: 在司法实践中,“执行难”问题长期存在,困扰着我国的民事执行工作。民事执行实施权社会化是破解“执行难”的创新路径,旨在通过引入社会力量参与执行工作,构建“司法裁判 + 社会实施”的协同治理模式。基于执行权的公权力属性及社会契约理论,执行实施权的社会化改革具有正当性。当前,我国社会化实践集中于财产调查、文书送达及财产拍卖等领域,但仍面临主体资质不明、社会化覆盖狭窄、监督救济机制缺失三重困境。为进一步推进社会化实践,需明确律师及社会执行机构的资质标准,分阶段实现执行调查权深度社会化与查封扣押等权能社会化,并构建法院监督、当事人监督的监督体系及具体的救济程序,有助于优化司法资源配置,构建现代化执行治理体系,为解决“执行难”提供理论与实践参考。
Abstract: In judicial practice, the long-standing problem of “difficulty in enforcement” has plagued civil execution in China. The socialization of the implementation power of civil execution offers an innovative path to address this issue, aiming to introduce social forces into the enforcement process and establish a collaborative governance model of “judicial adjudication + social implementation”. Grounded in the public nature of enforcement power and social contract theory, the socialization reform of implementation power is justified. Current socialized practices in China focus on areas such as property investigation, service of legal documents, and property auction. However, they face three major dilemmas: unclear qualification standards for social actors, limited coverage of socialization, and a lack of supervision and remedy mechanisms. To further advance socialized practices, it is necessary to clarify qualification standards for private enforcement individuals, lawyers, and social enforcement agencies; gradually achieve deep socialization of enforcement investigation powers and the socialization of powers such as seizure and impoundment in phases; and establish a supervision system involving court oversight and party supervision, along with specific remedy procedures. These measures will help optimize the allocation of judicial resources, build a modern enforcement governance system, and provide both theoretical and practical references for resolving the “difficulty in enforcement”.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
2024年全国法院司法统计公报[J]. 中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报, 2025(4): 14-22.
|
|
[2]
|
陈杭平. 道路通向市场——民事执行体制改革新论[J]. 政治与法律, 2024(5): 114-127.
|
|
[3]
|
肖建国. 民事执行法[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2014.
|
|
[4]
|
张卫平. “审执分离”本质与路径的再认识[J]. 中国法学, 2023(6): 81-101.
|
|
[5]
|
黄忠顺. 民事执行机构改革实践之反思[J]. 现代法学, 2017, 39(2): 3-18.
|
|
[6]
|
宫雪. 我国民事执行权分权制约的路径选择与程序衔接[J]. 学术交流, 2017(3): 93-98.
|
|
[7]
|
谭秋桂. 民事执行权定位问题探析[J]. 政法论坛, 2003(4): 157-164.
|
|
[8]
|
王学辉, 刘海宇. 强制执行权在国家权力体系中的定位: 一个跨部门法的视角[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 49(5): 56-65.
|
|
[9]
|
潘剑锋, 牛正浩. 新时代“枫桥经验”视域下的社会化协同执行机制——基于J省法院的实证研究[J]. 东岳论丛, 2021, 42(3): 171-181, 192.
|
|
[10]
|
朱嵘. 民事强制执行社会化入法的类型化路径[J]. 人民司法, 2023(19): 72-78.
|
|
[11]
|
左卫民. 中国“执行难”应对模式的实证研究基于区域经验的分析[J]. 中外法学, 2022, 34(6): 1445-1463.
|
|
[12]
|
杨与龄. 强制执行法论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2002.
|
|
[13]
|
唐力. 公益诉讼判决执行权配置的实践逻辑与范式重构[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2025, 33(4): 66-83.
|
|
[14]
|
谭秋桂. 民事执行法学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005.
|
|
[15]
|
肖建国, 庄诗岳. 论民事执行实施权的优化配置——以我国的集约化执行改革为中心[J]. 法律适用, 2019(11): 3-18.
|
|
[16]
|
彭云翔. 民事执行调查社会化问题研究[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2020(1): 36-44.
|