智能时代下信息异化的表征、成因与治理路径
Representations, Causes and Governance Paths of Information Alienation in the Intelligent Era
DOI: 10.12677/acpp.2026.158358, PDF,   
作者: 崔子晗:北京交通大学马克思主义学院,北京
关键词: 信息异化算法信息Information Alienation Algorithm Information
摘要: 智能技术深度嵌入经济运行、社会治理与日常生活全过程,信息的资源属性、生产属性与治理属性在资本逻辑、技术逻辑与平台逻辑作用下呈现出由服务于人转向支配于人的异化趋势。本文以马克思异化理论为分析框架,揭示信息异化呈现为主客体关系倒置、人的主体性消解、价值目标偏移的现实表征,并从信息劳动产品、劳动过程、主体、社会关系四个层面阐释数字时代新型异化形态,继而从技术、主体、社会角度出发指出算法偏见、数字劳动剥削、资本垄断、流量价值导向是催生并加剧信息异化的深层诱因。最后,从健全分层化法治规制体系、构建全媒体传播体系破除算法茧房、推动算法技术向善平衡工具与价值理性、重塑全民数字价值认知并搭建多元协同治理格局四条路径,系统提出信息异化的化解方案,主张重建以人为核心的信息秩序,推动信息回归服务人的实践本质。
Abstract: With intelligent technologies deeply integrated into the entire processes of economic operation, social governance and daily life, information, endowed with resource, production and governance attributes, tends to alienate from serving human beings to dominating them under the combined forces of capital logic, technological logic and platform logic. Taking Marxist alienation theory as the analytical framework, this paper reveals the practical manifestations of information alienation including the inversion of subject-object relations, the dissolution of human subjectivity and the deviation of value objectives, and elaborates on the new forms of alienation in the digital era from four dimensions: the products of information labor, labor processes, labor subjects and social relations. Furthermore, from technological, individual and social perspectives, it identifies algorithmic bias, exploitation through digital labor, capital monopoly and the traffic-oriented value orientation as profound incentives that generate and exacerbate information alienation. Finally, this paper systematically puts forward solutions to resolve information alienation from four paths: improving a layered legal regulation system, constructing an all-media communication system to break algorithmic echo chambers, advancing ethical technology to balance instrumental rationality and value rationality, reshaping the public’s digital value cognition and establishing a multi-dimensional collaborative governance framework. It advocates rebuilding a human-centered information order and restoring the inherent practical nature of information as a tool to serve humanity.
文章引用:崔子晗. 智能时代下信息异化的表征、成因与治理路径[J]. 哲学进展, 2026, 15(8): 36-42. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2026.158358

参考文献

[1] 朱春艳, 孙安洋. 论数字劳动中的主体性悖论及其扬弃[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科版), 2025, 51(6): 104-113, 280.
[2] 马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 94-95.
[3] (加)尼克∙斯尔尼塞克, 著. 平台资本主义[M]. 程水英, 译. 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2018: 46.
[4] 马文保, 何小雨. 信息异化的资本逻辑批判[J]. 当代世界社会主义问题, 2023(3): 154-163, 168.
[5] 闫瑞峰. 算法设计伦理治理的立场、争论与对策[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2023, 45(6): 1-9.
[6] 唐树源. 数字经济时代的“数据剥削”风险及其规制: 基于马克思产权理论的分析[J]. 改革与战略, 2025, 41(4): 138-143.
[7] 范如国. 平台技术赋能、公共博弈与复杂适应性治理[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021(12): 131-152, 202.
[8] 胡剑, 贾丽红. 数字化赋能全过程人民民主: 作用机理、风险审视与纾解路向[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2024(2): 68-81.
[9] 马克思, 恩格斯:. 马克思恩格斯选集(第一卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012: 56.
[10] 戴子薇. “数字资本主义”语境下数字主权的结构性异化与治理转向[J]. 山东科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2026, 28(1): 26-36.
[11] 谢瑜, 谢熠. 大数据时代技术治理的情感缺位与回归[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2022, 38(1): 124-128.
[12] 周济南, 胡梦田. 数字治理从 “赋权”到“平权”: 数字素养培育的生成机理与实现方略[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2025(7): 80-95.
[13] 赵淼, 鲍静, 刘银喜. 从赋能到包容: 数字政府建设非均衡困境生成机制及化解路径[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022(12): 41-48.