“和而不同”何以消解卢卡奇“物化”?——基于中国传统哲学与现代批判的双向阐释
How Can “Harmony in Diversity” Resolve Lukács’s Theory of Reification?—A Two-Way Interpretation Based on Traditional Chinese Philosophy and Modern Critical Theory
摘要: 资本逻辑的扩张引发了人的异化与物化困境,成为现代社会发展无法回避的核心命题。卢卡奇以马克思异化理论为基础,结合发达资本主义社会的现实,提出了“物化”理论,深刻揭示了工具理性主导下人的主体性丧失、社会关系异化、生存意义消解的文化困境。然而,卢卡奇将物化的消解寄托于无产阶级阶级意识的总体性觉醒,过于依赖主体意识的转变,因此面临着理论与实践的双重困境。中国传统哲学中的“和而不同”思想,历经数千年的传承与发展,蕴含着整体性思维、差异包容理念与共生智慧,为消解物化困境提供了独特的理论资源与实践路径。本文以卢卡奇物化理论为参照,从资本异化与物化的本质剖析出发,深入挖掘“和而不同”思想的哲学意蕴,系统阐释其消解物化的内在机制,探索传统哲学与现代批判理论的融合路径,为实现人的自由全面发展、构建和谐共生的现代社会提供新的思考与启示。
Abstract: The expansion of capital logic has given rise to the predicaments of human alienation and reification, making it an unavoidable core issue in the development of modern society. Building upon Marx’s theory of alienation and integrating it with the realities of advanced capitalist society, Lukács proposed his theory of “reification”, which profoundly reveals the cultural dilemmas of modern society—namely, the loss of human subjectivity, the alienation of social relations, and the dissolution of existential meaning—all under the dominance of instrumental rationality. However, Lukács placed the resolution of reification in the total awakening of proletarian class consciousness, relying too heavily on the transformation of subjective consciousness; consequently, his approach faces dual theoretical and practical predicaments. The traditional Chinese philosophical concept of “harmony in diversity” (he er bu tong), developed and transmitted over thousands of years, embodies holistic thinking, the principle of inclusive difference, and wisdom of coexistence, thereby providing unique theoretical resources and practical pathways for resolving the predicament of reification. Taking Lukács’s theory of reification as a reference point, this paper begins with an analysis of the essence of capital alienation and reification, delves deeply into the philosophical implications of “harmony in diversity”, systematically elucidates its internal mechanisms for dissolving reification, and explores pathways for integrating traditional philosophy with modern critical theory. The ultimate aim is to offer new insights and inspirations for realizing the free and comprehensive development of human beings and for constructing a harmonious and symbiotic modern society.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012: 158.
|
|
[2]
|
马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 156-169.
|
|
[3]
|
卢卡奇. 历史与阶级意识[M]. 杜章智, 任立, 燕宏远, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1999.
|
|
[4]
|
孔明安, 王馨雨. 物化逻辑的演变及其当代批判[J]. 学习与探索, 2025(6): 19-27.
|
|
[5]
|
左丘明. 国语[M]. 韦昭, 注. 北京: 中华书局, 2013: 156.
|
|
[6]
|
左丘明. 左传[M]. 杜预, 注, 孔颖达, 疏. 北京: 中华书局, 2017: 1423-1424.
|
|
[7]
|
孔子. 论语[M]. 杨伯峻, 译注. 北京: 中华书局, 2009: 138.
|
|
[8]
|
张晓庆. 和而不同: 儒家共同价值思想的伦理实现[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2024(6): 30-38.
|