空间流转与数字赋能:农村随迁老人的社会适应与身份协商
Spatial Mobility and Digital Empowerment: Social Adaptation and Identity Negotiation among Elderly Migrants in Rural Areas
DOI: 10.12677/ar.2026.138520, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张盈盈:南京林业大学人文社会科学学院、生态文明传播学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 农村随迁老人身份协商社会适应数字技术空间流动Elderly Migrants in Rural Areas Identity Negotiation Social Adaptation Digital Technology Spatial Mobility
摘要: 在城镇化与数字化双重浪潮的推动下,农村随迁老人面临着空间流动下社会适应和身份失调的挑战。本研究聚焦于这一群体的社会适应与身份协商问题,探讨其在城乡迁移过程中如何通过积极的日常实践应对身份危机,并在数字技术的赋能下实现自我重构。研究发现,农村随迁老人在城市生活中普遍遭遇“身份超载”“身份断裂”与“身份悬置”三重困境,在此背景下,老人通过信息资本的转化、熟人网络的跨地维系以及数字技能的再社会化,得以在日常生活中重建社会联结与自我认同。进一步地,身份协商呈现出三种路径:穿梭于城乡之间的“弹性”身份、平衡于客观期待与主观认同之间的“液态”身份,以及立足于数字契约系统的“契约”身份。
Abstract: Driven by the dual forces of urbanization and digitalization, elderly migrants from rural areas face challenges related to social adaptation and identity dissonance resulting from spatial mobility. This study focuses on the issues of social adaptation and identity negotiation among this group, exploring how they address identity crises through proactive daily practices during the urban-rural migration process and achieve self-reconstruction with the empowerment of digital technology. The study finds that rural elderly migrants commonly encounter a triple dilemma of “identity overload”, “identity rupture”, and “identity suspension” in urban life. Against this backdrop, they are able to rebuild social connections and self-identity in their daily lives through the transformation of informational capital, the cross-regional maintenance of familiar networks, and the resocialization of digital skills. Furthermore, identity negotiation manifests through three distinct pathways: a “resilient” identity that traverses urban and rural spaces; a “fluid” identity that balances objective expectations with subjective self-identification; and a “contractual” identity grounded in digital contractual systems.
文章引用:张盈盈. 空间流转与数字赋能:农村随迁老人的社会适应与身份协商[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(8): 15-22. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.138520

参考文献

[1] 汪民安. 文化研究关键词[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2020: 326.
[2] 季乃礼, 许博. 少数民族流动人口身份认同: 实证与反思[J]. 民族研究, 2023(6): 12-25, 138-139.
[3] 赵静, 杨宜音. 城管的身份认同威胁及其身份协商策略[J]. 学术研究, 2017(4): 63-68.
[4] 林仲轩, 仲崇源. 祖籍国社交媒体使用何以重塑自我——对来华华裔新生代身份协商的考察[J]. 华侨华人历史研究, 2024(3): 48-57.
[5] 刘云刚, 周雯婷, 黄徐璐, 等. 全球化背景下在华跨国移民社区的空间生产——广州远景路韩国人聚居区的案例研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(7): 976-986.
[6] 李锦昊, 陈浩然, 马凌. 越南难侨的身份协商与国家认同——基于珠海市原红旗华侨农场的案例[J]. 人文地理, 2023, 38(1): 56-63.
[7] 费梅苹, 杨瑛. 发展核心自我: 流动社会中自我视角社会工作的重构[J]. 社会科学研究, 2023(4): 122-129.
[8] 蔡玲. 流动的背后: 家庭关系与男性气质建构[J]. 中国农村观察, 2018(4): 17-31.
[9] 米歇尔·福柯. 自我技术: 福柯文选Ⅲ[M]. 汪民安, 编. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 54, 74-75.
[10] 杨君, 林星宇, 蒋佳妮. 身份获取与空间再造: 社区共同体构建的内生性逻辑[J]. 学习与实践, 2025(9): 101-113.
[11] 施蒂格∙夏瓦. 文化与社会的媒介化[M]. 刘君, 李鑫, 漆俊邑, 译. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2018: 152.
[12] Conradson, D. and Mckay, D. (2007) Translocal Subjectivities: Mobility, Connection, Emotion. Mobilities, 2, 167-174.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17450100701381524
[13] Pile, S. and Thrift, N. (1995) Mapping the Subject: Geographies of Cultural Transformation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 3, 748-750.
[14] 李永萍. 功能性家庭: 农民家庭现代性适应的实践形态[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 17(2): 44-60.
[15] 王卓, 刘小莞. 数字社群: 信息社会新型群己关系与演化逻辑[J]. 社会科学研究, 2025(5): 128-138.
[16] 安东尼∙吉登斯. 现代性的后果[M]. 田禾, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2000: 80.
[17] Burke, P.J. (2006) Identity Change. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 81-96.
https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900106
[18] Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1991) The Social Construction of Reality. Penguin Books Ltd, 1-219.
[19] 哈特穆特∙罗萨. 新异化的诞生: 社会加速批判理论大纲[M]. 郑作彧, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2018: 60.
[20] Deaux, K. (1993) Reconstructing Social Identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 4-12.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293191001
[21] Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity. Polity Press, 121 p.
[22] Maine, H.S. (1908) Ancient Law, Its Connection with the Early History of Society, and Its Relation to Modern Ideas. John Murray, 151 p.
[23] 薛彦波, 仇宁. 现代城市人与生存场所情感关系的转变[J]. 城市问题, 2013(6): 28-31.