产融结合路径及经济效果研究综述
A Review of the Path and Economic Effects of Industry-Finance Integration
摘要: 产融结合,通常是指产业和金融部门通过相互持股、人员整合等方式合作,在我国,主要是产业资本单向流入金融领域。在市场经济和资本市场的不断演进中,产融结合逐渐成为大型企业集团迈向更高发展阶段的关键路径,但仍有不少企业因缺乏金融领域经验,导致产融结合效果不佳,因此,研究我国上市公司的产融结合路径及经济效果具有现实意义。文章在产融结合本质的基础上,系统梳理了产融结合动因、模式、路径及经济效果相关研究。研究结果表明,企业进行产融结合主要是为了提升经营稳健性、增强风险抵御能力以及分散经营压力等,而国内产融结合主要存在金融内部化模式、产业链金融模式和金融控股模式这三种主流的发展模式,大部分企业通过组建集团专属财务公司、参股基金机构、入股商业银行以及持有证券公司股权四种路径实施产融结合,从而对经济效果产生影响。基于此,文章提出产融结合未来研究方向可围绕数智化赋能、绿色低碳转型、风险防控与监管创新等核心方向展开,紧扣新型工业化与新质生产力发展需求。
Abstract: The industrial-finance integration usually refers to the cooperation between the industrial and financial sectors through mutual shareholding, personnel integration, and other means. In China, it is mainly the one-way inflow of industrial capital into the financial sector. With the continuous evolution of the market economy and capital market, industrial-finance integration has gradually become a key path for large enterprise groups to move towards a higher stage of development. However, many enterprises still have poor results in industrial-finance integration due to a lack of experience in the financial field. Therefore, it is of practical significance to study the industrial-finance integration paths and economic effects of listed companies in China. Based on the essence of the integration of industry and finance, this article systematically sorts out the related research on the driving forces, models, paths and economic effects of the integration of industry and finance. The research results show that the main purpose of enterprises’ integration of industry and finance is to enhance operational stability, strengthen risk resistance capabilities, and disperse operational pressure, etc. In China, there are mainly three mainstream development models of industry-finance integration: the internalization of finance model, the industrial chain finance model, and the financial holding model. Most enterprises implement the integration of industry and finance through four paths: establishing a group-exclusive finance company, participating in fund institutions, investing in commercial banks, and holding equity in securities companies, thereby influencing economic performance. Based on this, the article proposes that future research directions for the integration of industry and finance can focus on core areas such as digital and intelligent empowerment, green and low-carbon transformation, risk prevention and control, and regulatory innovation, closely aligning with the development needs of new industrialization and new quality productivity.
文章引用:胡杨. 产融结合路径及经济效果研究综述[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2026, 15(4): 874-881. https://doi.org/10.12677/fia.2026.154091

参考文献

[1] 傅艳. 产融结合简析[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2004(1): 69-71.
[2] 徐丹丹. 产融结合的理论分析[J]. 学术交流, 2006(5): 111-113.
[3] 张庆亮, 孙景同. 我国产融结合有效性的企业绩效分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2007(7): 96-102.
[4] 支燕, 吴河北. 动态竞争环境下的产融结合动因——基于竞争优势内生论的视角[J]. 会计研究, 2011(11): 72-77+93.
[5] Raykov, R. and Silva-Buston, C. (2020) Holding Company Affiliation and Bank Stability: Evidence from the US Banking Sector. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, Article 101739.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101739
[6] Mirzaei, A. and Grosse, R. (2019) The Interaction of Quantity and Quality of Finance: Did It Make Industries More Resilient to the Recent Global Financial Crisis? International Review of Economics & Finance, 64, 493-512.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.08.010
[7] Duchin, R., Gilbert, T., Harford, J. and Hrdlicka, C. (2017) Precautionary Savings with Risky Assets: When Cash Is Not Cash. The Journal of Finance, 72, 793-852.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12490
[8] Kliman, A. and Williams, S.D. (2014) Why ‘Financialisation’ Hasn’t Depressed US Productive Investment. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39, 67-92.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beu033
[9] Barth, J.R., Caprio Jr., G. and Levine, R. (2012) Guardians of Finance: Making Regulators Work for Us. Mit Press.
[10] Chowdhury, R.H. and Maung, M. (2012) Financial Market Development and the Effectiveness of R&D Investment: Evidence from Developed and Emerging Countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 26, 258-272.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2011.12.003
[11] 李翀, 曲艺. 美日德产融结合模式比较分析及对中国的启示[J]. 南京社会科学, 2012(5): 1-8.
[12] 邢天添. 中国产融结合: 演进路径、宏观效应与产融政策[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2016(12): 91-100.
[13] 王克馨, 李宏. 产融结合发展的模式选择与对策研瞻[J]. 经济研究参考, 2015(22): 78-82.
[14] 戎晓畅, 马志尧. 我国中小企业产融结合的发展模式与建议[J]. 银行家, 2016(2): 54-56.
[15] 黄光明, 刘放. 实体企业持股金融机构是否提升了风险承担水平[J]. 财会月刊, 2018(18): 59-66.
[16] 王华. 企业的产融结合模式及其风险分析[J]. 上海商业, 2019(5): 56-57.
[17] 谭小芳, 张伶俐. 产融结合类型、研发投资与创新产出[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(11): 99-108.
[18] 杨涛. 新形势下产融结合创新与发展[J]. 中国金融, 2020(12): 50-52.
[19] 吕福智. 集团公司产融结合的协同效应分析——以上海电气为例[J]. 财会通讯, 2021(10): 125-128.
[20] 时亚宁. 新形势下我国产融结合模式探讨[J]. 投资与合作, 2022(11): 37-39.
[21] 孙东妮. 产融结合类型对研发支出的影响分析[J]. 金融文坛, 2024(7): 25-27.
[22] 陈兆波. 产融结合及实施路径研究[J]. 金融经济, 2015(20): 95-96.
[23] 邓超, 许志勇. 民营企业金融化发展路径与风险防范[J]. 理论探讨, 2017(5): 109-113.
[24] 刘璐洋. 传统能源企业集团产融结合路径选择探讨[J]. 财经界, 2019(35): 81-82.
[25] 林瑞伟. 关于中央企业产融结合发展路径的探索[J]. 全国流通经济, 2021(8): 110-112.
[26] 尹中涛. 工程设计企业产融结合必要性及实现路径研究[J]. 价值工程, 2022, 41(13): 26-28.
[27] 曾建军. 新时代产融结合发展路径探讨[J]. 中国商论, 2023(21): 143-146.
[28] Kaplan, G., Moll, B. and Violante, G.L. (2018) Monetary Policy According to Hank. American Economic Review, 108, 697-743.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160042
[29] 周晨. 产融结合、关系型交易与公司资本配置效率[J]. 财会通讯, 2019(15): 76-80.
[30] 庄仲乔. 产融结合对传统工业转型升级的影响研究——以2000-2017年纺织业A股上市公司为例[J]. 当代经济科学, 2019, 41(2): 122-128.
[31] 杨筝, 李茫茫, 刘放. 产融结合与实体企业技术创新: 促进还是抑制——基于金融机构持股实体企业的实证研究[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2019(10): 62-77.
[32] 宫兴国, 王耀崧. 产融结合、融资约束与企业财务风险[J]. 会计之友, 2020(13): 47-52.
[33] 戴建元, 马德学, 张伟, 等. 环境不确定性、产融结合与资本结构动态调整[J]. 财会月刊, 2021(24): 29-38.
[34] 田利辉, 王可第, 马静, 等. 产融结合对企业创新的影响: 资源协同还是资源诅咒? [J]. 经济学(季刊), 2022, 22(6): 1891-1912.
[35] 袁玲, 梁意实. 产融结合与企业数字化转型: 促进或抑制[J]. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(6): 31-46.
[36] 沈映春, 汤奥灵. 产融结合对企业绿色全要素生产率的影响研究[J]. 新型工业化理论与实践, 2024, 1(4): 126-136.
[37] 李文贵, 蔡雍蓉. 产融结合: “助推主业”还是“脱实向虚”?——基于上市公司持股金融机构的研究[J]. 会计之友, 2019(3): 63-67.
[38] 胡彦鑫, 刘娅茹, 杨有振. 产融结合能否提升企业投资效率?——基于上市公司持股金融机构的经验证据[J]. 经济问题, 2019(3): 39-46.
[39] 沈璐, 陈祖英, 汪金祥. 产融结合与实体企业未来主业发展: 助力还是阻力[J]. 财会月刊, 2019(14): 65-74.
[40] 霍远, 王琳颖. 产融结合影响了企业投资效率么?——基于制造业上市公司数据的实证研究[J]. 会计之友, 2020(18): 49-53.
[41] Meng, Y. (2020) Industry-finance Integration and Corporate Innovation. Modern Economy, 11, 292-321.
https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2020.112025
[42] 方健, 陈战运, 陈小娟. 浅析国有建筑企业产融结合模式[J]. 中国总会计师, 2024(8): 55-57.