从碎片化到整体性治理:中国社会保障数字治理的转型路径
From Fragmented to Holistic Governance: The Path to Transformation in China’s Digital Governance of Social Security
DOI: 10.12677/mm.2026.168159, PDF,   
作者: 胡浩凇:中央民族大学管理学院,北京
关键词: 社会保障数字治理整体性治理Social Security Digital Governance Holistic Governance
摘要: 数字技术的深度嵌入正在重塑中国社会保障治理的形态与逻辑。然而,长期以来部门分割、数据孤岛与服务断裂构成的碎片化困境,制约着治理效能的整体性提升。文章聚焦中国社会保障数字治理从碎片化迈向整体性治理的转型历程,基于整体性治理理论,揭示其演进脉络与实践成效。通过对深圳“智慧社保”、浙江“浙里惠民保”与成都“免申即享”三地实践的剖析,提炼出构建中国式社保数字治理共同体的转型路径,助力提升民生福祉。
Abstract: The deep integration of digital technologies is reshaping the form and logic of social security governance in China. However, the long-standing fragmentation caused by departmental divisions, data silos, and service gaps has hindered the overall improvement of governance effectiveness. This article focuses on the transformation of China’s digital social security governance from a fragmented to a holistic model, using multiple case studies to reveal its evolutionary trajectory and practical outcomes. By analyzing the initiatives in Shenzhen (“Smart Social Security”), Zhejiang (“Zheli Huiminbao”), and Chengdu (“Automatic Access without Application”), the article identifies a path toward building a Chinese-style digital social security governance community, thereby helping to enhance the well-being of the people.
文章引用:胡浩凇. 从碎片化到整体性治理:中国社会保障数字治理的转型路径[J]. 现代管理, 2026, 16(8): 35-42. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2026.168159

参考文献

[1] 陈堂. 中国数字化转型: 发展历程、运行机制与展望[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(1): 139-149.
[2] 蔡翠红. 数字治理的概念辨析与善治逻辑[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2022-10-13(005).
[3] Huang, J., Henfridsson, O., Liu, M.J. and Newell, S. (2017) Growing on Steroids: Rapidly Scaling the User Base of Digital Ventures through Digital Innovaton1. MIS Quarterly, 41, 301-314.
https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.16
[4] Perri 6 (1997) Holistic Government. Demos.
[5] Perri 6, Leat, D., Seltzer, K., et al. (2002) Towards Holistic Governance: The NewReform Agenda. Palgrave.
[6] 竺乾威. 从新公共管理到整体性治理[J]. 中国行政管理, 2008(10): 52-58.
[7] 克劳斯·彼得森, 杰尼克·休乌. 数字化时代的丹麦福利国家: 政策变革与战略困境[J]. 社会保障评论, 2019, 3(2): 59-67.
[8] Jørgensen, R.F. (2021) Data and Rights in the Digital Welfare State: The Case of Denmark. Information, Communication & Society, 26, 123-138.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.1934069
[9] 郑永年. 技术赋权: 中国的互联网、国家与社会[M]. 北京: 东方出版社, 2014.
[10] 郑磊. 数字治理的效度、温度和尺度[J]. 治理研究, 2021, 37(2): 5-16.
[11] Gupta, A. (2023) Digitalisation of the Welfare State: Lessons for the Emerging Economies. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 69, 453-467.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561231153903
[12] 丹尼尔·布尔. 数字化时代的德国福利国家: 主要挑战与发展之道[J]. 社会保障评论, 2019, 3(2): 50-60.
[13] 曲锋, 白维军. 我国社会保障数字化治理的难点及其突破[J]. 行政论坛, 2023, 30(2): 148-153.
[14] 何文炯. 适应数字化时代的劳动者社会保险制度优化[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 48(2): 11-12.
[15] 何文炯. 数字化、非正规就业与社会保障制度改革[J]. 社会保障评论, 2020, 4(3): 16-25.
[16] 陈健. 民政网上做[J]. 中国计算机用户, 2000(39): 36-41.
[17] 人力资源与社会保障部信息中心. 金保工程建设的过去、现在和未来[J]. 中国医疗保险, 2009(6): 35-37.
[18] 李维科. 国际数据公司发布《中国数字化转型市场预测, 2021—2026》报告[J]. 科技中国, 2022(8): 105.
[19] 杨立雄. 数字化转型与“创造性破坏”: 社会保障数字治理研究[J]. 社会保障评论, 2023, 7(5): 3-23.
[20] 俞萍丽, 吴恩慧, 汪怡洋. 参保2026年度“浙里惠民保”人数已超2700万[N]. 钱江晚报, 2025-12-24(009).