制度拼凑视域下电商平台绿色标签的合法性研究
Research on the Legitimacy of E-Commerce Platform Green Labels from the Lens of Institutional Bricolage
摘要: 在绿色消费理念持续普及的背景下,电商平台所设立的绿色标签成为消费者识别环保产品的重要依据。然而,当前各电商平台在绿色标签的设置与应用过程中,普遍存在标准不一致、认证体系混乱、信息真实性难以辨别等问题,很大程度上削弱了消费者的绿色信任。因此,本研究以制度拼凑作为分析视域,探讨电商平台绿色标签合法性困境的形成机制与治理路径。研究发现:制度真空、利益驱动与监管滞后这三大因素,共同导致了电商平台绿色标签的制度拼凑现象;该现象使绿色标签在规范合法性、认知合法性及规制合法性层面陷入困境;要突破困境,需通过制度统一、权威背书、技术赋能与平台自身规制等多方面协同推进。本文旨在丰富制度理论在电商平台治理领域的应用,也为解读与应对绿色标签乱象提供新的理论视角。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the growing prevalence of green consumption, green labels established by e-commerce platforms have become an important reference for consumers to identify environmentally friendly products. However, in the process of setting and applying green labels, e-commerce platforms are currently confronted with issues such as inconsistent standards, chaotic certification systems, and difficulty in verifying information authenticity, which have considerably undermined consumers’ green trust. Accordingly, this study adopts institutional bricolage as an analytical lens to explore the formation mechanism of the legitimacy dilemma surrounding green labels on e-commerce platforms and the pathways to address it. The findings reveal that institutional vacuum, interest-driven behaviors, and regulatory lag collectively contribute to the phenomenon of institutional bricolage of green labels on e-commerce platforms. This phenomenon leads green labels into legitimacy predicaments across three dimensions: normative legitimacy, cognitive legitimacy, and regulatory legitimacy. Resolving these predicaments requires the synergistic advancement of institutional unification, endorsement by authoritative bodies, technological empowerment, and platform self-regulation. This study aims to enrich the application of institutional theory in the field of e-commerce platform governance and to offer a new theoretical perspective for understanding and responding to the chaos surrounding green labels.
文章引用:马晓雪, 冯缨. 制度拼凑视域下电商平台绿色标签的合法性研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(8): 66-74. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.158849

参考文献

[1] Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962) La pensée sauvage. Plon.
[2] Cleaver, F. (2001) Institutional Bricolage, Conflict and Cooperation in Usangu, Tanzania. IDS Bulletin, 32, 26-35.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2001.mp32004004.x
[3] 徐国冲, 宋知远. “拼凑式合作”: 资源约束下基层治理的“权宜之计”? [J]. 公共行政评论, 2024, 17(5): 65-82+197-198.
[4] 贺锦江, 周影, 倪文斌. 从“无名小卒”到“崭露头角”: 数字化背景下生态参与者的制度拼凑策略与合法性获取研究[J]. 管理评论, 2024, 36(7): 275-288.
[5] Van Assche, K., Verschraegen, G., Beunen, R., Gruezmacher, M. and Duineveld, M. (2023) Combining Research Methods in Policy and Governance: Taking Account of Bricolage and Discerning Limits of Modelling and Simulation. Futures, 145, Article 103074.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103074
[6] Frick-Trzebitzky, F., Alba, R. and Fehrs, K. (2023) Adaptive Governance as Bricolage. Geographica Helvetica, 78, 397-409.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-78-397-2023
[7] 练宏. 游走在程序与效率之间: 地方政府的多重规则运作研究[J]. 社会, 2023, 43(6): 181-208.
[8] Yao, F., Li, B., Lv, Y. and Qin, X. (2025) Eco-Labels and Sales Mode Selection Strategies for E-Commerce Platform Supply Chain. Managerial and Decision Economics, 46, 1278-1296.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4433
[9] Sigurdsson, V., Larsen, N.M., Pálsdóttir, R.G., Folwarczny, M., Menon, R.G.V. and Fagerstrøm, A. (2022) Increasing the Effectiveness of Ecological Food Signaling: Comparing Sustainability Tags with Eco-Labels. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1099-1110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.052
[10] Velasco, F., Itani, O.S. and Cajina, P. (2024) Ecolabel Persuasion Effect across Cultures: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. International Marketing Review, 41, 1190-1217.
https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-10-2023-0293
[11] 卢宏亮, 谢欢. 如何打通绿色购买决策的“最后一公里”——绿色购买意向-行为转化机制分析[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2024(3): 92-100.
[12] 万旭之. 绿色标签可信度对品牌偏好一致性的影响研究[J]. 消费与品牌传播, 2025(17): 71-74.
[13] 邢心. 考虑标签认证和造假的企业环境标签策略选择研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 株洲: 湖南工业大学, 2024.
[14] Zhang, S., Wu, C., Yan, X., Chen, Y. and Shi, H. (2025) Unverifiable Green Signals and Consumer Response in E-Commerce: Evidence from Platform-Level Data. Sustainability, 17, Article 5678.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135678
[15] Suchman, M.C. (1995) Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
[16] Scott, R.W. (2013) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests & Identities. Sage Publications.
[17] 温莹莹. 合法性机制的比较研究(上) [M]//温莹莹. 何以公共: 农村公共物品供给制度的合法性机制探究. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2024: 113-132.
[18] 王宝玺, 杜蕾. 新制度主义视角下我国交叉学科建设的合法性审视[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2025(5): 31-38.
[19] 王建明, 赵婧. 推进绿色低碳消费扩容升级的重点领域和长效机制[J]. 阅江学刊, 2024, 16(6): 78-91+179-180.
[20] 郭小平, 李晓. 环境传播视域下绿色广告与“漂绿”修辞及其意识形态批评[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2018, 47(1): 149-156.
[21] 曹明德. 我国绿色产品认证标识法律制度的路径探析[J]. 现代法学, 2022, 44(6): 133-145.
[22] 高歌. 行为导向的绿色消费政策设计[J]. 社会科学家, 2023(9): 79-84.