黄龙溪气候舒适度及其与戏水需求相关性研究
Climatic Comfortable Degree and Its Relationship with Water-Play Demand in Huanglongxi
DOI: 10.12677/gser.2026.154058, PDF,   
作者: 韩 静, 张 熙, 李昭霞:成都市双流区气象局,四川 成都;陈 翼*:成都市气象局,四川 成都;韩 琳:成都信息工程大学大气科学学院,四川 成都
关键词: 人体舒适度百度指数戏水黄龙溪相关性Human Comfortable Degree Baidu Index Water-Playing Huanglongxi Relationship
摘要: 本研究聚焦成都黄龙溪古镇暑期戏水旅游人体舒适度研究,利用双流国家站(56288, 1990~2024)及4个区域站(2014~2024)气象资料,解析了区域人体舒适度的时空变化特征。通过百度指数搜索“黄龙溪 + 戏水”关键词在特定时段的热度,结合气象和假期因素,采用线性回归分析揭示了暑期戏水需求的时空特征及其与舒适度的相关性。结果表明:(1) 黄龙溪及周边区域人体舒适度以“舒服”(平均38%)为主,其次为“暖和”(19.70%)、“凉爽”(10.61%),“热”等级最低(6.82%);全年舒适日数(舒服至凉爽)约占70%;(2) 黄龙溪的网络关注度在暑期形成显著峰值,且其搜索热度与高温天气存在显著正相关,表明戏水需求是暑期旅游市场的主导驱动力。同时,研究识别出潜在的客流高峰时段,为景区管理部门开展客流实时预警、资源动态调配及目标客群精准营销提供了科学依据。基于网络搜索数据的旅游需求预测,可指导景区及相关部门优化运营管理流程、创新开发亲水旅游产品体系、实施有效的客流错峰引导措施,从而提升游客游览体验,保障景区可持续发展。
Abstract: This study centers on the assessment of human comfortable degrees during summer water-based tourism activities in Huanglongxi Ancient Town, Chengdu. Based on the meteorological data from Shuangliu National Station (Station ID: 56288, covering the period from 1990 to 2024) and four regional stations (spanning from 2014 to 2024), we analyzed the spatio-temporal characteristics of human comfort in the region. Through an examination of Baidu Index search trends for the keywords “Huanglongxi + water-playing” during specific periods, and by integrating meteorological conditions with holiday factors, we employed linear regression analysis to uncover the spatio-temporal characteristics of summer water-playing demand and its correlation with comfortable levels. The results were that: (1) In Huanglongxi and its environs, the predominant comfortable level was “comfortable,” averaging 38%, followed by “warm” at 19.70%, “cool” at 10.61%, and “hot” being the least prevalent at 6.82%. Comfortable days (ranging from comfortable to cool) constitute 70% of the annual total. (2) Online interesting in Huanglongxi peaks significantly during the summer, with search popularity showing a marked positive correlation with high-temperature conditions, underscoring water-playing as the primary driver of summer tourism. Additionally, the study pinpoints potential peak tourist periods, offering a scientific foundation for scenic management to implement real-time passenger flow alerts, dynamic resource allocation, and targeted marketing strategies. Forecasting tourism demand based on online search data could guide scenic areas and relevant authorities in optimizing operational management, innovating water-playing tourism product offerings, and adopting effective passenger flow distribution measures, thereby enhancing visitor experiences and ensuring the sustainable development of the scenic area.
文章引用:韩静, 陈翼, 张熙, 李昭霞, 韩琳. 黄龙溪气候舒适度及其与戏水需求相关性研究[J]. 地理科学研究, 2026, 15(4): 633-644. https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2026.154058

参考文献

[1] Gómez Martín, M.B. (2005) Weather, Climate and Tourism a Geographical Perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 32, 571-591.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.08.004
[2] Scott, D. and Lemieux, C. (2010) Weather and Climate Information for Tourism. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 1, 146-183.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2010.09.011
[3] 余志康, 孙根年, 罗正文, 冯庆. 40˚N以北城市夏季气候舒适度及消夏旅游潜力分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(2): 327-339.
[4] 刘海洋, 吴月, 王乃昂, 马宁. 中国沙漠旅游气候舒适度评价[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(4): 831-838.
[5] 李晓洋, 张亚丽, 李彤霄, 郭宇龙, 朱绘慧. 基于1987-2016年气象数据的河南省气候舒适度时空变化特征研究[J]. 河南科学, 2019, 37(2): 283-290.
[6] 张小泉, 傅帅, 杨知非, 等. 武义县气候舒适度变化及未来趋势分析[J]. 科技通报, 2019, 35(10): 39-45.
[7] 范业正, 郭来喜. 中国海滨旅游地气候适宜性评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 1998(4): 17-24.
[8] 乐满, 王式功, 尚可政, 等. 1961-2014年中国大陆舒适度时空变化[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 55(4): 455-462.
[9] 陶生才, 潘婕, 张磊, 胡新华, 雷淑琴. 1971-2013年敦煌旅游气候舒适度分析与评价[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2016, 10(1): 27-33.
[10] 张莹, 马敏劲, 王式功, 等. 中国大陆九大名山风景区旅游气候舒适度评价[J]. 气象, 2013, 39(9): 1221-1226.
[11] 邹金慧. 中国重要旅游城市旅游环境舒适度时空特征分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2018.
[12] Katz, J. and Aspden, P. (1997) Motivations for and Barriers to Internet Usage: Results of a National Public Opinion Survey. Internet Research, 7, 170-188.
https://doi.org/10.1108/10662249710171814
[13] 路紫, 赵亚红, 吴士峰, 等. 旅游网站访问者行为的时间分布及导引分析[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(6): 621-630.
[14] 李山, 邱荣旭, 陈玲. 基于百度指数的旅游景区络空间关注度: 时间分布及其前兆效应[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2008, 24(6): 102-107.
[15] 王斌, 唐承财, 葛全胜. 气候变化对旅游目的地适宜性影响研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10): 1756-1769.
[16] Li, J., Xu, L., Tang, L., Wang, S. and Li, L. (2018) Big Data in Tourism Research: A Literature Review. Tourism Management, 68, 301-323.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.03.009
[17] 马丽君, 孙根年, 王洁洁. 基于温湿指数的中国热点旅游城市气候适宜度评价[J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(5): 871-879.
[18] Rutty, M., Scott, D., Matthews, L., Burrowes, R., Trotman, A., Mahon, R., et al. (2020) An Inter-Comparison of the Holiday Climate Index (HCI:Beach) and the Tourism Climate Index (TCI) to Explain Canadian Tourism Arrivals to the Caribbean. Atmosphere, 11, Article 412.
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11040412
[19] 中华人民共和国文化和旅游部. 2022年文化和旅游发展统计公报[R/OL]. 2023-07-13.
https://zwgk.mct.gov.cn/zfxxgkml/tjxx/202307/t20230713_945922.html, 2026-04-05.