企业ESG表现的提升机制研究——政府引导基金驱动研发投入与多维度内部控制的经验分析
Research on the Mechanism for Improving Corporate ESG Performance—An Empirical Analysis of Government-Guided Fund-Driven R&D Investment and Multi-Dimensional Internal Control
摘要: 立足高质量发展与“双碳”发展导向背景,企业ESG治理对推动绿色可持续发展意义重大。本文选取2013~2024年上市公司为样本,基于双向固定效应与中介效应模型,探究政府引导基金对企业ESG表现的影响及研发投入和内部控制的传导机制。研究发现:政府引导基金能够显著提升企业ESG水平,结论通过稳健性与内生性检验;内部控制和研发投入发挥中介作用,即政府引导基金可通过优化企业内部治理和提升研发投入,间接助推企业ESG提质;该赋能效应在大规模企业、高市场竞争行业中更显著。本文厘清了政府引导基金赋能企业ESG发展的内在机理,丰富了相关领域研究成果,为政府优化基金配置、企业完善治理与ESG建设提供了参考依据。
Abstract: Based on the context of high-quality development and the “dual-carbon” development orientation, corporate ESG governance is of great significance in promoting green and sustainable development. This paper selects listed companies from 2013 to 2024 as the sample and, based on a two-way fixed effects and mediation effects model, explores the impact of government guidance funds on corporate ESG performance and the transmission mechanisms of R&D investment and internal control. The study finds that: government guidance funds can significantly improve corporate ESG levels, and the conclusions have been verified through robustness and endogeneity tests; internal control and R&D investment play a mediating role, meaning that government guidance funds can indirectly promote corporate ESG improvement by optimizing corporate internal governance and increasing R&D investment; this enabling effect is more evident in large-scale enterprises and industries with high market competition. This paper clarifies the internal mechanisms through which government guidance funds empower corporate ESG development, enriches relevant research findings, and provides a reference basis for the government to optimize fund allocation and for companies to improve governance and ESG development.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Lerner, J. (2000) The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Impact of the SBIR Program. The Journal of Private Equity, 3, 55-78. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2000.319960
|
|
[2]
|
Engel, D. and Keilbach, M. (2007) Firm-Level Implications of Early Stage Venture Capital Investment—An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Empirical Finance, 14, 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2006.03.004
|
|
[3]
|
胡浩志, 朱方政. 政府引导基金与企业ESG表现[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 78(6): 125-138.
|
|
[4]
|
宫义飞, 张可欣, 徐荣华, 等. 政府引导基金发挥了“融资造血”功能吗[J]. 会计研究, 2021(4): 89-102.
|
|
[5]
|
许志勇, 果思畅, 张梦, 等. 政府引导基金与企业ESG表现: 效应与机制[J]. 南开管理评论, 2026, 29(3): 16-27+52.
|
|
[6]
|
吴超鹏, 严泽浩. 政府基金引导与企业核心技术突破: 机制与效应[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(6): 137-154.
|
|
[7]
|
黄世忠, 叶丰滢. 我国制定气候相关披露准则面临的十大挑战及应对[J]. 财务研究, 2023(3): 3-10.
|
|
[8]
|
王登泉. 控股股东股权质押、ESG信息披露与发展潜力信号释放[J]. 统计与决策, 2025, 41(14): 156-161.
|
|
[9]
|
陈晓珊, 刘洪铎. 机构投资者持股与公司ESG表现[J]. 金融论坛, 2023, 28(9): 58-68.
|
|
[10]
|
石青梅, 高雅珊, 张赛男. 从控制缺位到责任缺失: 双无控制对企业ESG表现的影响研究[J]. 会计与经济研究, 2024, 38(5): 44-62.
|
|
[11]
|
方红星, 金玉娜. 高质量内部控制能抑制盈余管理吗?——基于自愿性内部控制鉴证报告的经验研究[J]. 会计研究, 2011(8): 53-60.
|
|
[12]
|
钟凯, 吕洁, 程小可. 内部控制建设与企业创新投资: 促进还是抑制?——中国“萨班斯”法案的经济后果[J]. 证券市场导报, 2016(9): 30-38.
|
|
[13]
|
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.
|