基于VOF-Simulink的跨介质无人机仿真分析
Simulation Analysis of a Cross-Medium UAV Based on VOF-Simulink
摘要: 针对跨介质无人机水面起飞过程中浮力补偿衰减、水面效应变化以及旋翼升力需求动态调整等问题,本文建立了结合Fluent VOF多相流仿真与MATLAB/Simulink动力学建模的联合分析方法。首先,基于VOF模型对无人机在纯空气、近水面和远水面三种工况下的流场分布与升力响应进行数值模拟,分析自由液面对旋翼气动特性的影响;随后,将CFD仿真得到的升力数据引入Simulink,构建考虑吃水深度变化、浮力衰减和高度相关升力修正的水面连续起飞动力学模型。结果表明,近水面工况下旋翼稳态升力约为10.0 N,相较纯空气工况下的8.8 N提高约13.6%;当桨盘距水面高度与桨叶半径之比H/R大于0.8时,水面效应对升力的影响明显减弱。Simulink仿真进一步表明,起飞初期静浮力能够抵消部分重力并提高有效升力裕度,随着机体逐渐离水,浮力补偿减小,旋翼需承担的净升力需求增加,系统加速度呈下降趋势。研究结果揭示了跨介质无人机水面起飞阶段升力、浮力与水面效应之间的耦合机理,可为后续自主起降控制、抗扰动控制律设计和起飞过程参数优化提供参考。
Abstract: To address buoyancy compensation decay, water-surface effect variation, and the dynamic rotor lift demand during water-surface takeoff of a cross-medium UAV, this study establishes a coupled analysis method that integrates Fluent VOF multiphase-flow simulation with MATLAB/Simulink dynamic modeling. A VOF model is first used to simulate the flow-field distribution and lift response under pure-air, near-water-surface, and far-water-surface conditions, so as to evaluate the influence of the free surface on rotor aerodynamic performance. The lift data obtained from the CFD simulations are then introduced into Simulink to build a continuous water-surface takeoff model that accounts for draft variation, buoyancy decay, and height-dependent lift correction. The results show that the steady rotor lift near the water surface is approximately 10.0 N, which is about 13.6% higher than the pure-air value of 8.8 N. When the ratio between the rotor disk height above the water surface and the blade radius, H/R, exceeds 0.8, the influence of the water-surface effect is significantly weakened. The Simulink results further indicate that static buoyancy offsets part of the vehicle weight during the initial takeoff stage and increases the effective lift margin. As the vehicle leaves the water, buoyancy compensation decreases, the net lift demand borne by the rotors increases, and the acceleration gradually declines. The proposed approach reveals the coupled mechanism among lift, buoyancy, and water-surface effect during cross-medium takeoff, and provides a reference for autonomous takeoff control, disturbance-rejection control design, and parameter optimization.
文章引用:朱丰毅, 史春景, 郝永平. 基于VOF-Simulink的跨介质无人机仿真分析[J]. 建模与仿真, 2026, 15(8): 12-26. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2026.158119

参考文献

[1] 刘相知, 崔维成. 潜空两栖航行器的综述与分析[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2019, 14(S2): 1-14.
[2] 杨兴帮, 梁建宏, 文力, 等. 水空两栖跨介质无人飞行器研究现状[J]. 机器人, 2018, 40(1): 102-113.
[3] 蔡昌. 下一代浅海低空监控系统中的无人机应用场景分析[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2016, 38(22): 175-177.
[4] 杨晓飞, 於慧敏, 孟子晗, 等. 一种用于辅助搜救的两栖飞行器设计[J]. 扬州大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 22(3): 631-636.
[5] 汲万峰, 戚学文, 李冬. 可再入跨介质无人飞行器作战应用及效能评估[J]. 电光与控制, 2022, 29(9): 38-42.
[6] Yang, X.B., Wang, T.M., Liang, J.H., et al. (2015) Survey on the Novel Hybrid Aquatic-Aerial Amphibious Aircraft: Aquatic Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (AquaUAV). Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 74, 131-151.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.12.005
[7] 冯金富, 胡俊华, 齐铎. 水空跨介质航行器发展需求及其关键技术[J]. 空军工程大学学报, 2019, 20(3): 8-13.
[8] 黄领才, 雍明培. 水陆两栖飞机的关键技术和产业应用前景[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(1): 18-34.
[9] 盛振邦, 刘应中. 船舶原理: 上、下册[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2003.
[10] 胡铁牛. 船舶静力学[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2022.
[11] 安东东. 船舶在随机风浪作用下的倾覆仿真研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2019.
[12] 刘天淇. 无人艇自扶正性能影响因素分析与优化方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2024.
[13] 杨帆. 跨介质飞行器旋翼流动机理及外形设计[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2023.
[14] 杨祥生, 赵宁, 田琳琳. 基于改进k-ω SST模型的风力机尾流数值模拟[J]. 太阳能学报, 2017, 38(4): 920-927.
[15] 白兴之, 吴文华, 林泽铖, 等. 旋翼近水面效应影响因素[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(1): 85-92.
[16] 高世才, 王潇. 旋翼跨介质飞行气动特性与机理仿真分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(3): 87-97.