间性视域下跨文化叙事的“第三条路径”——以《给阿嬷的情书》为例
The “Third Path” of Cross-Cultural Narrative from the Perspective of Interality—A Case Study of “A Letter to Grandma”
摘要: 在当下跨文化叙事常常陷入“他者化”与“本质化”的双重困境时,电影《给阿嬷的情书》展现了一种截然不同的叙事可能。本文以该片为个案,运用“间性”哲学视角与“求似析异”叙事伦理框架,分析其如何通过内化视角、伦理化身份转换与生活化叙事,超越上述二元窠臼。研究发现:影片以“侨批”这一家庭记忆为线索,聚焦离散、情义、爱与责任等普遍情感体验,在“间性”的哲学自觉中实现了“求似”与“析异”的有机融合,共同构建了一条以跨文化理解与意义生成为指向的“第三条路径”。该片的成功实践,为数字语境下呈现兼具地方根基与跨文化可通约性的叙事文本,提供了可参照的叙事范本与伦理框架。
Abstract: At a time when cross-cultural narratives are often caught between the dual pitfalls of “othering” and “essentialization”, the film “A Letter to Grandma” presents a markedly different narrative possibility. Taking this film as a case study, this paper employs the philosophical lens of “interality” and the narrative ethics framework of “seeking commonality while differentiating particularities” to examine how the film transcends these binary constraints through an internalized perspective, ethically grounded identity shifts, and quotidian storytelling. The study finds that, by centering on the “Qiaopi” (remittance letters sent by overseas Chinese to their families back home) as a vehicle of family memory, the film foregrounds universal emotional experiences such as diaspora, loyalty, love, and responsibility. In doing so, it achieves an organic integration of seeking shared human sentiments and respectfully presenting cultural specificities within the philosophical awareness of interality, thereby forging a “third path” oriented toward cross-cultural understanding and meaning co-creation. The film’s success offers a replicable narrative model and ethical framework for producing cross-cultural narratives that are simultaneously grounded in local particularities and accessible across cultural boundaries in the digital age.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
高曦. 双重话语规训: 论萨义德“东方主义”理论[J]. 宁夏社会科学, 2023(2): 58-65.
|
|
[2]
|
戴哲, 汪佳雨. 自我东方主义的叛逆与迎合——论华莱坞科幻电影中的“中国表达” [J]. 传媒论坛, 2023, 6(1): 20-24+57.
|
|
[3]
|
赵稀方. 何种“想象”, 怎样“共同体”?——重估本尼迪克特·安德森《想象的共同体: 民族主义的起源与散布》[J]. 文艺研究, 2022(6): 152-160.
|
|
[4]
|
俞悦, 张弛. 霍米·巴巴后殖民理论下《最后的礼物》中的文化身份问题研究[J]. 英语广场, 2025(7): 45-49.
|
|
[5]
|
杨春时. 文学理论: 从主体性到主体间性[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2002(1): 17-24.
|
|
[6]
|
曹霞. 华侨华人传播中华文化的身份构建与功能角色[J]. 华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(3): 151-160.
|
|
[7]
|
陈文泰. “此在”与“遍在”: 跨文化传播间性审思的两个向度[J]. 编辑之友, 2023(11): 99-106.
|
|
[8]
|
高薇华, 石田. 间性思维下的跨媒介故事世界建构[J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2021, 43(8): 89-93.
|
|
[9]
|
林升栋. 间距与之间: 中西文化间传播的研究进路探讨[J]. 跨文化传播研究, 2021(1): 102-115.
|
|
[10]
|
邓建国. “求似析异, 文明互鉴”: 建构中国新闻传播学自主知识体系的路径探析[J]. 南京社会科学, 2024(1): 110-121.
|
|
[11]
|
卫白鸽. 文化认同理论视域下中国对非洲跨文化传播的实践探索[J]. 西亚非洲, 2024(2): 145-170+176.
|
|
[12]
|
詹奕嘉, 邓华. 《给阿嬷的情书》里的潮汕元素, 你知道多少? [EB/OL]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/20260515/c753436f2aea4ac5b102cb0914a69dc4/c.html, 2026-06-06.
|
|
[13]
|
宗俊伟. 《给阿嬷的情书》何以破圈(深观察) [EB/OL]. http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrbhwb/pc/content/202605/29/content_30159740.html, 2026-06-06.
|
|
[14]
|
韩文. 女性书写、情义伦理与文化认同: 侨批电影《给阿嬷的情书》中的离散叙事与女性互助实践[J]. 贺州学院学报, 2026, 42(3): 78-85.
|
|
[15]
|
何李, 黄思萍. 侨批的伦理悖论: 《给阿嬷的情书》中的代笔、记忆与情感合法性[J/OL]. 中北大学学报(社会科学版), 1-7. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/14.1329.C.20260521.1018.006, 2026-07-19.
|
|
[16]
|
陈捷. 《给阿嬷的情书》: 骨血里的“情义”和忍不住的“关怀” [J]. 电影艺术, 2026(4): 85-89+162.
|