汉维身体部位词语义拓展对比研究
A Contrastive Study on Semantic Extension of Body-Part Terms in Chinese and Uyghur
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.148784, PDF,   
作者: 姑丽米热·卡迪尔:中央民族大学中国少数民族语言文学学院,北京
关键词: 身体部位词语义拓展认知语言学隐喻转喻Body-Part Terms Semantic Extension Cognitive Linguistics Metaphor Metonymy
摘要: 身体部位词作为语言中最原始、最基础的核心词汇,其语义拓展现象背后蕴含着人类认知活动的深层规律。本文以认知语言学理论为框架,选取汉语与维吾尔语中的多义身体部位词为研究对象,从义项数量、词性变化、语义拓展路径及认知机制等方面展开对比分析。研究发现,汉维身体部位词均遵循“近取诸身”的认知规律,以隐喻和转喻为核心语义拓展机制,但汉语身体部位词的语义拓展更具广泛性和抽象性,词性变化丰富。维吾尔语则更聚焦具象化表达,语义拓展多依赖词缀或词组实现。这种差异是语言类型特征、文化认知模式以及语言接触等因素共同作用的结果,能够为跨语言认知研究提供典型案例。
Abstract: As the most primitive and fundamental core vocabulary in language, body-part terms embody deep-seated principles of human cognitive activities through their semantic extension. Framed within cognitive linguistics, this paper takes polysemous body-part terms in Chinese and Uyghur as research objects and conducts a contrastive analysis from the perspectives of sense inventory, part-of-speech variation, semantic extension paths, and cognitive mechanisms. The findings reveal that both Chinese and Uyghur body-part terms follow the cognitive principle of “mapping from the human body”, with metaphor and metonymy serving as the core mechanisms of semantic extension. However, Chinese body-part terms exhibit greater extensiveness and abstractness in semantic extension, along with richer part-of-speech shifts, whereas Uyghur tends to favor more concrete and imagery-based expressions, with semantic extension largely realized through affixation or phrasal constructions. These differences result from the interplay of language typological features, cultural cognitive patterns, and language contact, and thus provide a typical case for cross-linguistic cognitive research.
文章引用:姑丽米热·卡迪尔. 汉维身体部位词语义拓展对比研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(8): 278-285. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.148784

参考文献

[1] Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
[2] 黄碧蓉. 人体词语语义研究[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2010.
[3] 孙影. 汉语身体词词义范畴化的认知研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2023.
[4] 刘畅, 阿孜古丽∙夏力甫. 基于资源库的维吾尔语以køz构成的固定短语概念隐喻的认知研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(6): 322-329.
[5] 邓婷予, 阿孜古丽∙夏力甫. 基于资源库对维吾尔语固定短语中baʃ的概念隐喻和转喻认知分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(6): 386-393.
[6] 葛爱华, 骆惠珍. 汉维语人体器官词语文化内涵透视[J]. 语文学刊, 2012(2): 24-26.
[7] 依斯马依力∙艾肯木. 语言类型学视野下的维吾尔-汉语言五官词的语义对比探析[J]. 曲靖师范学院学报, 2023, 42(4): 117-123.
[8] 樊国贤. 汉语和维吾尔语的“以身喻物”成语[J]. 文化学刊, 2015(7): 87-90.
[9] 热娜古丽∙艾合麦提. 维汉有关“心” “يۈرەك”词群的隐喻对比分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆师范大学, 2016.
[10] 黄树先. 汉语身体词探索[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2012.
[11] 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. 现代汉语词典[M]. 第7版. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016.
[12] 阿不都沙拉木∙阿巴斯, 阿不都哈帕尔∙阿不都热合曼, 等. 维汉大词典[M]. 北京: 民族出版社, 2006.