《生态环境法典》视域下生态优先原则的司法适用标准研究
A Study on the Judicial Application Criteria of the Ecological Priority Principle under the Perspective of the Environmental and Ecological Code
摘要: 《生态环境法典》总则编第六条正式将生态优先确立为基本原则,实现了该理念从宏观政策宣示到法典基本规范的转型,为环境司法衡平生态利益、经济利益与社会公共利益提供了根本价值遵循。但生态优先作为内涵具有开放性的法律原则,无明确构成要件与法定后果,其司法适用面临启动边界模糊、利益衡量基准缺失、裁判说理程式化、适用限度缺乏比例约束等现实难题。文章以《生态环境法典》规范体系为基础,厘清生态优先原则的法理内涵与体系定位,剖析其司法适用的现实困境与生成逻辑,从适用前提、利益衡量、比例限度、裁判说理四个维度构建可操作的司法适用标准体系,并配套四项保障机制。研究认为,生态优先并非绝对优先,而是有条件、可衡量、受约束的顺位优先规则。该标准体系有助于统一环境资源案件裁判尺度,推动法典基本原则精准落地,为环境司法守护生态安全底线、推进人与自然和谐共生的法治建设提供理论参考。
Abstract: Article 6 of the General Provisions of the Ecological and Environmental Code formally establishes the principle of ecological priority as a fundamental rule, marking a transformation from macro-level policy declaration to codified legal norm. This provides foundational value guidance for environmental adjudication in balancing ecological interests, economic interests, and public social welfare. However, ecological priority is an open-ended legal principle lacking clear elements or specific legal consequences. Current judicial practice suffers from practical shortcomings such as ambiguous thresholds for application, a lack of uniform standards in interest balancing, formulaic reasoning in judgments, and unregulated boundaries of application without proportionality constraints. Based on the normative framework of the Ecological and Environmental Code, this article defines the doctrinal meaning and systemic position of the ecological priority principle, identifies existing challenges and their root causes in judicial application, and constructs an operational standard system across four dimensions: prerequisites for application, interest balancing, proportionality limits, and judicial reasoning. It further proposes four supporting mechanisms to clarify that ecological priority is not absolute but conditional, measurable, and subject to constraints, thus establishing a ranked priority rule. These measures aim to unify judicial standards in environmental resource cases, ensure precise implementation of the basic principles of the Ecological and Environmental Code, and advance the rule of law in safeguarding ecological security and promoting harmonious coexistence between humanity and nature.
文章引用:吴发泉. 《生态环境法典》视域下生态优先原则的司法适用标准研究[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(8): 10-17. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.148225

参考文献

[1] 张梓太. 论生态环境法典的范式意蕴[J]. 法律适用, 2026(5): 66-83.
[2] 张璐. 环境司法专门化中的利益识别与利益衡量[J]. 环球法律评论, 2018, 40(5): 50-66.
[3] 巩固. 环境法典基石概念探究从资源、环境、生态概念的变迁切入[J]. 中外法学, 2022, 34(6): 1523-1542.
[4] 杜群. 自然生态保护规制实践逻辑对生态环境法典编纂的指引[J]. 政治与法律, 2024(11): 2-19.
[5] 焦艳鹏. 法益解释机能的司法实现——以污染环境罪的司法判定为线索[J]. 现代法学, 2014, 36(1): 108-120.
[6] 董岩. 环境公益损害救济诉求下排除危害责任的解释论分析[J]. 法学论坛, 2020, 35(3): 151-160.
[7] 吕忠梅. 环境法典编纂论纲[J]. 中国法学, 2023(2): 25-47.
[8] 张宝. 环境法典编纂中民事责任的定位与构造[J]. 环球法律评论, 2022, 44(6): 40-55.
[9] 侯明明, 周诗雅. 法官援引生态文明裁判说理的实证考察与法理反思[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2024, 34(12): 108-115.
[10] 陈海嵩. 我国环境监管转型的制度逻辑——以环境法实施为中心的考察[J]. 法商研究, 2019, 36(5): 3-13.
[11] 侯国跃, 刘玖林. 民法典绿色原则: 何以可能以及如何展开[J]. 求是学刊, 2019, 46(1): 108-118.
[12] 杨临萍, 刘竹梅, 宋春雨, 等. 《关于审理生态环境侵权责任纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的理解与适用[J]. 人民司法, 2023(31): 39-45.