基于卡尔曼滤波的大学物理实验数据处理方法研究
A Study on Data Processing in University Physics Experiments Using Kalman Filter
摘要: 大学物理实验数据处理环节承载着丰富的科学方法论内涵,但当前教学中普遍采用的传统处理方法趋于固化,与后续专业课程体系衔接不足,制约了该环节育人效能的充分发挥。本文以教学改革为牵引,引入卡尔曼滤波算法,借助状态空间模型与递推估计机制,将现代滤波理论融入经典物理实验的数据处理过程。以液体表面张力电压测量、三线摆摆动周期测量及非平衡电桥温度传感器电压序列为对象,构建了一维与二维卡尔曼滤波模型。实验结果表明:一维滤波能够有效抑制重复测量中的随机波动与操作异常,二维滤波可自动拟合线性变化趋势,避免人工拟合引入的主观偏差。更关键的是,该方法的引入使学生在基础实验阶段即可接触状态估计与数据融合的基本方法,为后续自动控制、传感器技术、数字信号处理等专业课程奠定理论与方法基础。本文为大学物理实验教学改革提供了一条以数据处理方法创新为突破口、推动基础课程与专业教育有机融合的可行路径。
Abstract: The data processing component in university physics laboratory courses embodies substantial methodological significance. However, the conventional processing approaches currently employed in these courses have become increasingly ossified and inadequately aligned with subsequent specialized curricula, thereby constraining the pedagogical potential of this crucial instructional segment. Motivated by curriculum reform, this paper introduces the Kalman filtering algorithm into the data processing workflow of classical physics experiments, leveraging state-space models and recursive estimation mechanisms to integrate modern filtering theory with experimental practice. One-dimensional and two-dimensional Kalman filtering models are constructed for three representative cases: Voltage measurements in liquid surface tension experiments, oscillation period measurements in trifilar pendulum experiments, and voltage sequences from temperature sensors in unbalanced bridge circuits. Experimental results demonstrate that one-dimensional filtering effectively suppresses random fluctuations and operational anomalies in repeated measurements, while two-dimensional filtering automatically captures linear trends, thereby circumventing the subjective biases inherent in manual fitting. More significantly, the introduction of this method enables students to access fundamental concepts of state estimation and data fusion at the introductory laboratory stage, establishing a theoretical and methodological groundwork for subsequent courses in automatic control, sensor technology, and digital signal processing. This study offers a viable pathway for reforming university physics laboratory instruction by leveraging innovation in data processing methodologies as a catalyst for bridging fundamental coursework with professional education.
文章引用:张志婧, 沈一盈, 邱子妍, 王倩, 舒俊康, 王海龙, 梁席民. 基于卡尔曼滤波的大学物理实验数据处理方法研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(8): 450-459. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1681651

参考文献

[1] 刘培姣. 物理实验数据处理的常用方法[J]. 大学物理实验, 2007, 20(2): 70-73.
[2] 牛原, 肖霖, 成正维. 大学物理实验数据处理系统[J]. 大学物理实验, 2008, 21(1): 91-93.
[3] 胡炜. 普通累积法在物理实验数据处理中的应用[J]. 大学物理实验, 2008, 25(2): 82-84.
[4] 郭龙军, 谢亚胜, 芦立娟. C语言编程在大学物理实验中处理数据的研究[J]. 科技传播, 2010(24): 250+266.
[5] 姜王欣, 颜淑雯, 夏雪琴. 逐差法和Origin7.0软件在大学物理实验数据处理中的比较[J]. 大学物理实验, 2012, 25(2): 83-87.
[6] 杨秀莲. 大学物理实验中数据处理方法的灵活应用[J]. 中国科教创新导刊, 2012(16): 55-57.
[7] 王艳萍. 物理实验数据处理系统的开发与应用[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 杭州师范大学, 2011.
[8] 张弘强. 大学物理实验数据处理方法改革的探索与实践[J]. 赤峰学院学报(自然科学版), 2015, 31(16): 255-257.
[9] 俞眉孙, 陈中钧. 提高大学物理实验教学质量的体会[J]. 实验科学与技术, 2013, 11(5): 269-271.
[10] 刘渊. 误差理论与数据处理[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2008.
[11] 张淑芳. 应用型高校大学物理实验改革创新探索[J]. 大学教育, 2015(5): 107-108.
[12] 刘利清, 王利霞, 鞠维, 等. 基于OBE理念下的大学物理实验教学改革和试行方案[J]. 大学物理实验, 2020, 33(1): 126-128.
[13] 王婧. 基于微课的大学物理实验高效课堂教学模式研究——以“双创”为导向[J]. 吉林农业科技学院学报, 2020, 29(1): 122-124.
[14] Kalman, R.E. (1960) A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82, 35-45.
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552
[15] Harris, C.R., Millman, K.J., van der Walt, S.J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., et al. (2020) Array Programming with NumPy. Nature, 585, 357-362.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
[16] van der Walt, S., Colbert, S.C. and Varoquaux, G. (2011) The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation. Computing in Science & Engineering, 13, 22-30.
https://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2011.37
[17] Hunter, J.D. (2007) Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90-95.
https://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2007.55