极量否定结构“一点(儿)都不X”中X准入的语义条件
The Semantic Condition for X Admission in the Extreme Negation Structure of “Yi Dian Dou Bu X”
摘要: “一点(儿)都不X”是现代汉语中极具表现力的极量否定构式,其否定力度强于普通否定句,但学界对其中X的准入条件尚缺乏系统性的语义解释。本文在衍推逻辑和梯级模型的理论框架下,首先论证该构式的构式义为“以量级最低点‘一点儿’为操作对象,通过否定该最低点实现全量主观否定”。基于此,本文提出X准入的核心条件为[+可量化],并分别考察形容词、动词、名词三大词类进入该构式的语义限制。研究发现:性质形容词因具有全量幅特征而自由准入,状态形容词和区别词因程度固化而拒绝准入;动词中仅有心理状态动词、部分心理活动动词、心理使役动词及表可能性/意愿的能愿动词可准入,动作动词需在“习惯/态度”的语境转指下才能进入;名词则需通过“属性凸显”实现非范畴化,且其准入度呈现从抽象名词到专有名词再到英文借词的语义层级梯度。本文不仅深化了对汉语极量否定构式的认识,也为词类范畴的语义动态性提供了新的分析视角。
Abstract: The phrase “Yi Dian Dou Bu X” is a highly expressive negative construction in modern Chinese, with stronger negation than ordinary negative sentences. However, there is still a lack of systematic semantic explanation in the academic community regarding the admission criteria for X. Under the theoretical framework of deductive logic and cascade model, this article first argues that the construction meaning of this formula is “to operate on the lowest point of the scale, ‘Yi Dian’, by negating this lowest point, and through scale inference to achieve total subjective negation”. Based on this, this article proposes that the core condition for X admission is [+quantifiability], and examines the semantic limitations of adjectives, verbs, and nouns entering this construction. Research has found that property adjectives are freely admitted due to their full range characteristics, while state adjectives and distinguishing words are refused admission due to their degree of solidification; Only psychological state verbs, some psychological activity verbs, psychological causative verbs, and voluntary verbs expressing possibility/intention are allowed in verbs, while action verbs need to be referred to in the context of “habit/attitude” to enter; Nouns need to be non categorized through “attribute highlighting”, and their admission level presents a semantic gradient from abstract nouns to proper nouns and then to English loanwords. This article not only deepens the understanding of the Chinese extreme negation construction, but also provides a new analytical perspective for the semantic dynamics of word classes.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
郭锐. 衍推和否定[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2006(2): 5-16.
|
|
[2]
|
Israel, M. (2011) The Grammar of Polarity: Pragmatices, Sensitivity, and the Logic of Scales. Cambridge University Press.
|
|
[3]
|
袁毓林. “都, 也”在“WH + 都/也 + VP”中的语义贡献[J]. 语言科学, 2004(3): 3-13.
|
|
[4]
|
石毓智. 肯定否定的对称与不对称[M]. 北京: 北京语言文化大学出版社, 2001.
|
|
[5]
|
张国宪. 形容词的记量[J]. 世界汉语教学, 1996(4): 33-41.
|
|
[6]
|
杨云. 不受程度副词“很”修饰的心理动词[J]. 云南教育学院学报, 1999, 15(1): 68-71.
|
|
[7]
|
文雅丽. 现代汉语心理动词研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 北京语言大学, 2007.
|
|
[8]
|
陆俭明. 现代汉语语法研究教程[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2019.
|
|
[9]
|
檀栋. “程度副词 + 名词”结构的认知分析[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2012(4): 120-122.
|