积极老龄化视域下农村以地养老的困局与对策建议
Dilemmas and Countermeasures for Rural Land-Based Elderly Care from the Perspective of Active Ageing
DOI: 10.12677/ar.2026.138526, PDF,   
作者: 申臣军:贵州大学公共管理学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 积极老龄化以地养老农村养老土地权益Active Ageing Land-Based Elderly Care Rural Elderly Care Land Rights
摘要: 在人口老龄化城乡倒置加剧与农村养老服务供给不足的双重背景下,以地养老逐渐受到学界关注。本文以积极老龄化理论为视域,系统考察农村以地养老面临的困局及其破解路径。研究认为,以地养老受到四重困局的制约:土地权益资产化面临法律与政策梗阻,资金链可持续性存在隐忧,养老服务供给呈现系统性短缺,跨部门协同机制存在制度性缺失。破解上述困局,需要从价值理念、主体能力、实践模式、资源整合、监督评估五个维度协同推进,具体包括重塑积极老龄化价值理念,激活老年人参与主体能力,探索多元化实践模式,整合乡村存量资源,健全监督评估与动态调整机制。本文为积极老龄化理论在农村土地制度语境下的应用提供了新的分析框架,也为农村以地养老的规范化发展提供了学理支撑。
Abstract: Against the dual backdrop of an ageing population, the aggravation of urban-rural inversion, and insufficient rural elderly care services, rural land-based elderly care has gradually garnered academic attention. This paper, from the perspective of the active ageing theory, systematically examines the dilemmas faced by rural land-based elderly care and the paths to resolve them. The study argues that land-based elderly care is constrained by four major dilemmas: the assetisation of land rights faces legal and policy obstacles, there are hidden concerns regarding the sustainability of the funding chain, the supply of elderly care services shows systemic shortages, and there is an institutional lack of cross-departmental coordination mechanisms. To resolve these dilemmas, coordinated progress is needed across five dimensions: value concepts, stakeholder capacities, practical models, resource integration, and supervision and evaluation. Specifically, this includes reshaping the value concept of active ageing, activating the participatory capacity of the elderly, exploring diversified practical models, integrating existing rural resources, and improving supervision, evaluation, and dynamic adjustment mechanisms. This paper provides a new analytical framework for the application of active ageing theory in the context of rural land systems and offers theoretical support for the standardised development of rural land-based elderly care.
文章引用:申臣军. 积极老龄化视域下农村以地养老的困局与对策建议[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(8): 60-67. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.138526

参考文献

[1] 梁文凤. 人口老龄化背景下农村养老的现实困境与路径选择[J]. 经济纵横, 2022(10): 82-88.
[2] 齐鹏. 农村养老服务长效机制的构建[J]. 中州学刊, 2019(5): 72-79.
[3] 曲衍波, 柴异凡, 朱伟亚, 等. 基于“诊断-设计-结果”框架的农村宅基地退出模式原型分析[J]. 资源科学, 2021, 43(7): 1293-1306.
[4] 夏柱智. 以地养老: 应对农村人口老龄化的现实选择[J]. 南方人口, 2018, 33(5): 63-71.
[5] 朱浩, 陈功. “十五五”时期以养老服务高质量发展推进老龄社会治理现代化的实践路径[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 27(3): 77-88.
[6] 朱浩. 乡村振兴战略背景下农村养老服务模式创新的动力要素及其实现路径[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 39(1): 180-195.
[7] 梁琦. 从物质生产到价值生产: 中西部农村老年人以地养老的转化逻辑[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2023(6): 88-98.
[8] 李俏, 贾春帅. 供给侧改革视域下的合作社养老: 功能、模式与定位[J]. 宁夏社会科学, 2018(3): 100-107.
[9] 陈晓琳, 吴忠. 农民以地养老意愿及影响因素分析——基于河南省176位农民的实证调查[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(6): 179-185.
[10] 李永萍. “养儿防老”还是“以地养老”: 传统家庭养老模式分析[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 14(2): 103-112.
[11] 郑风田. 如何看待“以地养老” [J]. 人民论坛, 2018(2): 52-53.
[12] 郑风田. “以地养老”可以探索但不能强制[J]. 人民论坛, 2018(2): 53-55.
[13] 唐浩, 张聪. 土地制度应对农村人口老龄化: 挑战与思路[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(4): 34-44.
[14] 许诺. 农村互助养老新方式“以地助养”的实践特征与发展路向[J]. 社会保障研究, 2025(1): 20-30.
[15] 杨轶华, 王昆. “以地自我养老”与“代际关系维护”——生命历程视角下农村老年人的养老策略分析[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2021, 61(4): 45-54+235.