农机技术创新影响因素研究综述——基于供给–需求–政策–市场–环境框架
A Review of Factors Influencing Agricultural Machinery Technology Innovation—Based on the Supply-Demand-Policy-Market-Environment Framework
摘要: 农机技术创新是农业机械化高质量发展的核心驱动力,系统梳理其影响因素对推进农业现代化建设具有重要的学术价值。本文从概念内涵与测度方式出发,构建供给–需求–政策–市场–环境五维分析框架,对农机技术创新影响因素的理论机制与实证证据进行了系统综述。研究发现:(1) 研发投入、人力资本和产学研合作构成技术供给端的核心驱动力,其中人力资本的边际贡献高于研发经费;(2) 农业劳动力成本上升与规模化经营通过诱致性技术创新机制显著拉动农机创新需求,但该效应受地形条件约束;(3) 农机购置补贴具有市场扩大与逆向选择的双重效应,知识产权保护薄弱则导致企业倾向于低质量微创新;(4) 市场竞争与创新呈倒U型关系,适度的行业集中有利于提升创新动力;(5) 金融发展、数字技术渗透和农田宜机化条件等外部环境因素的作用日益凸显。在方法层面,现有研究以面板回归和空间计量为主,因果推断方法应用尚处于起步阶段。未来研究应着力于构建整合性理论框架、推进微观层面实证、强化因果识别设计,并重点关注数字技术推动和绿色农机等新兴议题。本文为后续实证研究提供了结构化的文献坐标与方向指引。
Abstract: Agricultural machinery technology innovation is the core driving force for the high-quality development of agricultural mechanization. Systematically sorting out its influencing factors has important academic value for promoting the construction of modern agriculture. Starting from the conceptual connotation and measurement methods, this paper constructs a five-dimensional analysis framework of supply-demand-policy-market-environment, and provides a systematic review of the theoretical mechanisms and empirical evidence of the influencing factors of agricultural machinery technology innovation. The study finds that: (1) R&D investment, human capital, and industry-university-research cooperation constitute the core driving forces on the technology supply side, with the marginal contribution of human capital exceeding that of R&D funding; (2) Rising agricultural labor costs and large-scale operations significantly drive the demand for agricultural machinery innovation through inducement-based technological innovation mechanisms, but this effect is constrained by terrain conditions; (3) Agricultural machinery purchase subsidies have dual effects of market expansion and adverse selection, while weak intellectual property protection leads enterprises to lean toward low-quality incremental innovation; (4) The relationship between market competition and innovation follows an inverted U-shape, and moderate industry concentration is conducive to enhancing innovation motivation; (5) The role of external environmental factors such as financial development, digital technology penetration, and farmland suitability for mechanization is increasingly prominent. Methodologically, existing studies mainly rely on panel regression and spatial econometrics, and the application of causal inference methods is still in its initial stages. Future research should focus on constructing integrated theoretical frameworks, advancing micro-level empirical studies, strengthening causal identification designs, and paying special attention to emerging topics such as digital technology promotion and green agricultural machinery. This paper provides a structured literature map and directional guidance for subsequent empirical research.
文章引用:王托, 单梦娇. 农机技术创新影响因素研究综述——基于供给–需求–政策–市场–环境框架[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(8): 90-99. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.168272

参考文献

[1] Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press.
[2] Hayami, Y. and Ruttan, V.W. (1970) Factor Prices and Technical Change in Agricultural Development: The United States and Japan, 1880-1960. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 1115-1141.
https://doi.org/10.1086/259694
[3] OECD (2018) Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4th Edition, OECD Publishing.
[4] Läpple, D., Renwick, A. and Thorne, F. (2015) Measuring and Understanding the Drivers of Agricultural Innovation: Evidence from Ireland. Food Policy, 51, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.11.003
[5] 周应恒, 蒋奇, 胡凌啸. 我国农机产业存在产能过剩吗?——基于中国农机产业数据的实证分析[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2017, 38(5): 801-808.
[6] 王维薇, 李平, 张俊飚. 我国农业机械化系统机构创新效率的时空演变及比较分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(15): 77-84.
[7] 张宗毅, 王许沁, 葛继红. 中国农机化效率: 区域差异及购置补贴影响效应——基于省域视角和DEA-Tobit模型的分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 20(3): 1-8.
[8] Griliches, Z. (1979) Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92-116.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3003321
[9] Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990) Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
[10] 周应恒, 张蓬, 严斌剑. 农机购置补贴政策促进了农机行业的技术创新吗? [J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2016, 15(5): 489-499.
[11] Lucas, R.E. (1988) On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
[12] 白人朴. 关于水稻生产机械化技术路线选择的几个问题[J]. 中国农机化, 2011(1): 3-7.
[13] Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4
[14] 速水佑次郎, 弗农·拉坦. 农业发展的国际分析[M]. 修订扩充版. 郭熙保, 张进铭, 等, 译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2000.
[15] 郑旭媛, 徐志刚. 资源禀赋约束、要素替代与诱致性技术变迁——以中国粮食生产的机械化为例[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2016, 16(1): 45-66.
[16] 钟甫宁, 纪月清. 土地产权、非农就业机会与农户农业生产投资[J]. 经济研究, 2009, 44(12): 43-51.
[17] 张琛, 彭超, 孔祥智. 农户分化的演化逻辑、历史演变与未来展望[J]. 改革, 2019(2): 5-16.
[18] 梁法双. 农业保护性耕作机械特征及农机农艺融合发展探索[J]. 农机使用与维修, 2023(12): 110-112.
[19] 章淑颖, 王玉霞, 张宗毅. 农机购置补贴政策增强了农机企业盈利能力吗?——基于中国工业企业数据的实证分析[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2018, 39(5): 817-827.
[20] 吴超鹏, 唐菂. 知识产权保护执法力度、技术创新与企业绩效——来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(11): 125-139.
[21] Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R. and Howitt, P. (2005) Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 701-728.
https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553053970214
[22] Schumpeter, J.A. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers.
[23] Marshall, A. (1890) Principles of Economics. Macmillan.
[24] Porter, M.E. and van der Linde, C. (1995) Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97-118.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
[25] Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
[26] Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998) Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-143.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8