从脱口秀语言中看词汇的内涵意义
A Perspective on Connotative Meanings of Lexical Items in Talk Show Discourse
摘要: 脱口秀作为一种以语言为核心表现手段的喜剧形式,其幽默效果在很大程度上依赖于词汇的巧妙运用。本研究以《脱口秀大会》为语料,从词汇语义学视角出发,系统考察脱口秀中词汇内涵意义的类型特征、生成机制及其社会功能,旨在弥补现有研究从“内涵意义”这一核心概念切入脱口秀话语分析的不足。研究首先梳理了内涵意义的定义、特征及理解机制,并回顾了幽默话语研究与脱口秀相关研究的现有成果。在此基础上,研究提出三个核心问题:脱口秀中词汇的内涵意义主要表现为哪些类型?其内涵意义是如何生成和被理解的?这种生成与传播具有怎样的社会批判功能?研究发现,《脱口秀大会》高频使用的词汇类型集中于日常生活与消费类、职场类及心理状态类领域。演员通过语义反转、类比投射和语境赋予三种策略激活词汇的内涵意义:语义反转法打破观众的语义预期,使词汇在反转中获得讽刺性内涵;类比投射法将某一领域的概念移植到另一领域,赋予被投射词汇新的联想意义;语境赋予法则通过特定叙事语境使普通词汇承载全新的内涵意义。这些策略的共同特征在于,通过概念意义与内涵意义之间的落差制造认知冲突,在消解过程中生成幽默效果。进一步分析表明,词汇内涵意义的创造性运用在脱口秀中超越了单纯的娱乐功能,具有一定的社会观察价值。它解构了婚姻神圣性、成长必然性等社会常识,揭示了消费主义对日常生活的渗透,并以喜剧而非说教的方式引导观众反思社会现实。这种“先发笑、后思考”的接受机制,使脱口秀成为一种能够被广泛接受的话语实践。本研究拓展了内涵意义理论在新型话语类型中的应用,为从词汇微观层面分析幽默生成机制提供了参考,对脱口秀创作实践亦有一定借鉴意义。
Abstract: As a comedic genre that relies primarily on language as its core means of expression, stand-up comedy derives its humorous effects to a considerable extent from the ingenious deployment of lexical items. Drawing upon data from Rock & Roast, this study adopts a lexico-semantic perspective to systematically examine the typological features, generative mechanisms, and social functions of connotative meaning in stand-up comedy discourse, with the aim of addressing the lacuna in existing research that has hitherto neglected to approach stand-up comedy through the lens of connotative meaning as a core concept in lexical semantics. The study first reviews the definitions, characteristics, and comprehension mechanisms of connotative meaning, and surveys existing scholarship on humorous discourse and stand-up comedy research. On this basis, three interrelated research questions are formulated: What are the principal types of connotative meaning manifested in stand-up comedy? How is connotative meaning generated and comprehended? What sociocultural functions do the generation and dissemination of connotative meaning serve? The findings indicate that high-frequency lexical items in Rock & Roast cluster predominantly around the domains of daily life and consumption, the workplace, and psychological states. Performers activate connotative meaning through three principal strategies: semantic reversal, analogical projection, and contextual enrichment. Semantic reversal subverts the audience’s semantic expectations, imbuing lexical items with ironic connotations; analogical projection transposes concepts from one domain to another, thereby conferring novel associative meanings upon the target lexical items; and contextual enrichment enables ordinary lexical items to bear entirely new connotative meanings through the construction of specific narrative contexts. The common feature of these strategies lies in the creation of cognitive dissonance through the gap between denotative and connotative meanings, with humor generated in the process of dissonance resolution. Further analysis reveals that the creative deployment of connotative meaning in stand-up comedy transcends mere entertainment value and possesses certain observational functions regarding society. It deconstructs social commonplaces such as the sanctity of marriage and the inevitability of growing up, exposes the deep penetration of consumerism into everyday life, and guides audiences to reflect upon social realities through comedic rather than didactic means. This “laughter-first, reflection-after” reception mechanism renders stand-up comedy a discursive practice that can be widely accepted. This study extends the application of connotative meaning theory to emerging discourse types, offers a reference for analyzing humor generation mechanisms from the micro-level perspective of lexical items, and holds certain referential significance for stand-up comedy writing practice.
文章引用:王玉霞, 赵凤宇, 陶怡婷. 从脱口秀语言中看词汇的内涵意义[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(8): 397-405. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.148797

参考文献

[1] Leech, G. (1981) Semantics. Penguin Books.
[2] 伍谦光. 语义学导论[M]. 长沙: 湖南教育出版社, 1988.
[3] 刘洋. 词汇内涵意义视角下的2020年《政府工作报告》英译探究[J]. 海外英语, 2021(10): 48-50.
[4] 吴玲. 文化语境与词汇内涵意义[J]. 湖南冶金职业技术学院学报, 2005(4): 437-440.
[5] 徐盛桓. 常规关系与认知化——再论常规关系[J]. 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), 2002(1): 6-16.
[6] Kotthoff, H. (2006) Gender and Humor: The State of the Art. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 4-25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.003
[7] Hofmann, J., Platt, T., Lau, C. and Torres-Marín, J. (2020) Gender Differences in Humor-Related Traits, Humor Appreciation, Production, Comprehension, (Neural) Responses, Use, and Correlates: A Systematic Review. Current Psychology, 42, 16451-16464.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00724-1
[8] Martin, R.A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J. and Weir, K. (2003) Individual Differences in Uses of Humor and Their Relation to Psychological Well-Being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48-75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00534-2
[9] 刘媛君. 中韩幽默话语表达方式的比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2025.
[10] 胡范铸. 幽默语言学[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1987.
[11] 谭达人. 幽默与言语幽默[M]. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 1997.
[12] 高胜林. 幽默修辞论[M]. 济南: 山东文艺出版社, 2006.
[13] 费红霞. 从关联理论看小品言语幽默的制造策略[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广州大学, 2010.
[14] 孟洋. 情景喜剧中幽默言语的语用策略——以《武林外传》为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2012.
[15] 高源彬. 乖讹-消解论视角下《脱口秀大会》幽默话语语用研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 暨南大学, 2022.
[16] 杨静. 脱口秀语言的语用研究——以《脱口秀大会》为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 吉林: 北华大学, 2021.
[17] 赵雁羽. 中韩情景喜剧的幽默生成机制——以韩国《搞笑一家人》和中国《我爱我家》为例[J]. 大众文艺, 2017(23): 165-166.
[18] Liang, X.J. (2018) A Pragmatic Study of Verbal Humor in Chinese and American Situation Comedies. Master’s Thesis, Chungnam National University.
[19] 黄影. 基于汉英对比的言语幽默的多视角研究——以脱口秀为例[D]: [博士学位论文]. 保定: 河北大学, 2023.
[20] 李莹. 脱口秀节目幽默话语产生的语言策略研究——以《天天向上》为例[J]. 青春岁月, 2013(4): 174+173.
[21] 杨霖菲.《脱口秀大会》的多模态话语研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学, 2022.
[22] 黎昭茜.《脱口秀大会》的幽默语言研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 西北民族大学, 2023.
[23] 王晨. 单口喜剧幽默语言研究——以《脱口秀大会》第三季为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2022.
[24] 王颖娜. 浅析社会语言学视角下语码转换的社会功能——以《脱口秀大会》(第三季)为例[J]. 英语广场, 2021(17): 44-47.
[25] 魏雨竹. 国产单口喜剧幽默话语的性别身份建构——以单口喜剧竞技节目《脱口秀大会(第四季)》为例[J]. 西部广播电视, 2023, 44(20): 143-148.
[26] 王云丽. 基于费尔克拉夫三维分析模型的《脱口秀大会》话语研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2023.
[27] 赵琪琪. 从预设角度分析《脱口秀大会》的言语幽默艺术[J]. 文化创新比较研究, 2020, 4(11): 48-49.
[28] 董金梁. 使用与满足视角下《脱口秀大会》的话题选取研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 长春理工大学, 2023.