路径化护理干预对脑血管狭窄介入治疗患者术后并发症及其与狭窄程度关系的研究
A Study on Path-Based Nursing Interventions for Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Interventional Treatment for Cerebral Vascular Stenosis and Their Relationship with Stenosis Severity
摘要: 目的:探讨路径化护理干预对脑血管狭窄患者介入治疗术后并发症的临床效果及其与狭窄程度的关系。方法:本研究为类实验性研究,纳入2023年12月至2025年6月收治的90例脑血管狭窄介入治疗患者,采用类实验性研究分为对照组、观察组各45例。两组患者基线资料均衡可比,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。对照组实施常规护理,观察组采用临床护理路径干预。通过比较两组患者术后并发症发生率、住院时长及患者满意度等指标,评估路径化护理模式的临床应用价值及分析并发症种类与脑血管狭窄程度的关系。结果:观察组术后并发症发生率为8.89% (4/45),对照组24.44% (11/45),两组比较有统计学意义(P = 0.04)。观察组住院时长(10.00 ± 2.93) d,对照组(12.13 ± 4.01) d,两组比较有统计学意义(P = 0.006)。观察组满意度97.78% (44/45),对照组88.89% (40/45),两组比较无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。血管狭窄程度与穿刺处皮下血肿、假性动脉瘤、脑血管痉挛等并发症均无统计学意义(P > 0.05),与脑过度灌注综合征(P < 0.01)的发生存在统计学意义。结论:临床护理路径模式可有效降低脑血管狭窄患者介入治疗术后并发症发生率,缩短住院时长,并提升患者满意度。脑高灌注综合征的发生与血管狭窄程度呈正相关。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of pathway-based nursing interventions on postoperative complications following interventional procedures in patients with cerebral vascular stenosis, and to examine its relationship with the degree of stenosis. Methods: This quasi-experimental study consecutively enrolled 90 patients with cerebral arterial stenosis undergoing endovascular treatment from December 2023 to June 2025, who were then assigned using the quasi-experimental study to a control group and an observation group (45 cases per group) with well-balanced baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). Patients were allocated to either the control group or the clinical-pathway group (n = 45 each) according to the order of admission. The control group received routine nursing care, while the observation group underwent clinical pathway-based nursing intervention. The clinical benefit of the pathway was assessed by comparing postoperative complication rates, length of stay, and patient satisfaction between the two groups. In addition, we analyzed whether specific complication types were associated with the degree of arterial stenosis. Results: The postoperative complication rate was 8.89% (4/45) in the observation group and 24.44% (11/45) in the control group, showing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.04). Mean length of stay was 10.00 ± 2.93 days in the clinical-pathway group and 12.13 ± 4.01 days in the control group (P = 0.006). Patient satisfaction was 97.78% (44/45) in the observation group and 88.89% (40/45) in the control group, with no statistically significant difference between groups (P > 0.05). The degree of vascular stenosis showed no statistically significant association with complications, such as subcutaneous haematoma at the puncture site, pseudoaneurysm, or cerebral vasospasm (P > 0.05), but was statistically significant in relation to the occurrence of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The clinical nursing pathway model effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative complications following interventional procedures in patients with cerebral vascular stenosis, shortens hospital stays, and enhances patient satisfaction. The occurrence of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome is closely associated with the degree of vascular stenosis.
文章引用:黄金花, 何莉, 陶凤丽. 路径化护理干预对脑血管狭窄介入治疗患者术后并发症及其与狭窄程度关系的研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(8): 705-713. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1682843

参考文献

[1] 李守勇, 张芙玮. 敏感指标建立的量化评价体系在脑血管介入治疗护理中的应用[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2021, 18(9): 1354-1356.
[2] 尤黎明, 吴瑛. 内科护理学[M]. 第6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017: 826.
[3] 王娟, 郝佩, 贺养敏, 等. 脑血管介入术后股动脉穿刺处血肿风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2025, 19(4): 41-47.
[4] 鞠东升, 官威, 潘澍潇, 等. 颈动脉支架介入治疗缺血性脑血管病的临床研究效果[J]. 世界最新医学, 2017, 17(46): 37-41.
[5] 柯朝霞, 屈新云, 柳阳娟, 等. 基于CNP的手术室细节护理对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2024, 30(18): 116-118.
[6] 逄雯倩, 宋国建, 孙一平, 等. 临床护理路径研究现状与趋势的可视化分析[J]. 护理护理实践与研究, 2023, 20(7): 1023-1030.
[7] 黄青云, 周海晏. 86例缺血性脑血管病支架植入术患者的护理[J]. 当代护士(中旬刊), 2021, 28(3): 23-25.
[8] 冯英璞, 霍晓冉, 张红梅, 等. 介入造影患者围手术期股动脉穿刺部位监测与管理的循证护理[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2023, 32(3): 272-277.
[9] Samuels, O.B., Joseph, G.J., Lynn, M.J., et al. (2000) A Standardized Method for Measuring Intracranial Arterial Stenosis. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 21, 643-646.
[10] 孙华娟, 谈士慧, 王玲. 临床护理路径在缺血性脑血管病介入患者护理中的应用[J]. 中国临床研究, 2020, 33(6): 863-864.
[11] 卓冬砚, 陈荣. 临床护理路径在老年股骨颈骨折患者围术期的应用效果[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2024, 43(3): 450-453.
[12] Jang, Y.J., Park, D., Kim, H.S., Lee, C.H., Byun, H.Y., Yoon, C.H., et al. (2020) Assessment of the Implementation of Critical Pathway in Stroke Patients: A 10‐Year Follow‐Up Study. BioMed Research International, 2020, Article ID: 3265950.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3265950
[13] 叶凤, 刘慧, 田小芳. 临床护理路径在脑血管病介入患者护理中的应用效果[J]. 中外医疗, 2025, 44(10): 171-174.
[14] Farooq, M.U., Goshgarian, C., Min, J. and Gorelick, P.B. (2016) Pathophysiology and Management of Reperfusion Injury and Hyperperfusion Syndrome after Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting. Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine, 8, Article No. 7.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13231-016-0021-2
[15] González García, A., Moniche, F., Escudero-Martínez, I., Mancha, F., Tomasello, A., Ribó, M., et al. (2019) Clinical Predictors of Hyperperfusion Syndrome Following Carotid Stenting: Results from a National Prospective Multicenter Study. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 12, 873-882.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.247
[16] Nakagawa, I., Yokoyama, S., Wajima, D., Nishimura, F., Yamada, S., Yokota, H., et al. (2019) Hyperventilation and Breath-Holding Test with Indocyanine Green Kinetics Predicts Cerebral Hyperperfusion after Carotid Artery Stenting. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 39, 901-912.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678x17743878
[17] Gao, F., Zhao, W., Zheng, Y., Li, S., Lin, G., Ji, M., et al. (2019) Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome after Surgery in Adult Patients with Moyamoya Disease. World Neurosurgery, 129, e48-e55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.191
[18] Kirchoff-Torres, K.F. and Bakradze, E. (2018) Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome after Carotid Revascularization and Acute Ischemic Stroke. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 22, Article No. 24.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0678-4
[19] Lin, Y.H. and Liu, H.M. (2020) Update on Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 12, 788-793.
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015621
[20] Ozdemir, M. and Sevinc, O.F. (2024) Relationship between Carotid Artery Stenosis Percentage and Complications in Patients Treated with Carotid Stenting. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 28, 3263-3267.