基于18F-FDG PET/CT影像组学预测结直肠癌微卫星不稳定状态的研究进展
Research Progress on Radiomics Based on 18F-FDG PET/CT for Predicting Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Cancer
摘要: 结直肠癌是全球高发恶性肿瘤,其发生发展与多种基因改变密切相关。微卫星不稳定状态,尤其是高度微卫星不稳定性,已成为指导结直肠癌免疫治疗、化疗及预后评估的重要标志物。目前,临床常用的MSI检测方法包括免疫组织化学和聚合酶链反应,均依赖术后组织样本,存在有创性、采样主观、无法动态监测等不足,也难以全面反映肿瘤内部的异质性。因此,术前无创、精准预测MSI状态具有重要临床意义。18F-FDG PET/CT作为功能成像技术,可定量评估肿瘤葡萄糖代谢活性,其代谢参数如肿瘤代谢体积、病灶糖酵解总量及异质性指数等,已被初步证实与结直肠癌MSI状态及HER2表达存在关联。近年来,影像组学通过高通量提取PET/CT图像中的定量特征,进一步揭示了肿瘤的微观异质性,为术前无创预测MSI状态提供了新工具。本文系统回顾18F-FDG PET/CT代谢参数及影像组学方法在预测结直肠癌MSI状态中的研究进展,分析其临床价值、面临挑战及未来发展方向,为结直肠癌个体化治疗决策提供理论依据。
Abstract: Colorectal cancer is a highly prevalent malignancy worldwide, and its development and progression are closely associated with multiple genetic alterations. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status, particularly high-level microsatellite instability, has become an important biomarker for guiding immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and prognostic assessment in colorectal cancer. Currently, commonly used clinical methods for MSI detection include immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction, both of which rely on postoperative tissue samples. These approaches are invasive, subject to sampling bias, and incapable of dynamic monitoring, and they also fail to comprehensively reflect intratumoral heterogeneity. Therefore, preoperative noninvasive and accurate prediction of MSI status holds significant clinical importance. As a functional imaging technique, 18F-FDG PET/CT enables quantitative assessment of tumor glucose metabolic activity. Its metabolic parameters, such as metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis, and heterogeneity indices, have been preliminarily shown to be associated with MSI status and HER2 expression in colorectal cancer. In recent years, radiomics has further revealed the microscopic heterogeneity of tumors by extracting high-throughput quantitative features from PET/CT images, offering a novel tool for the preoperative noninvasive prediction of MSI status. This article systematically reviews the research progress of 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and radiomics approaches in predicting MSI status in colorectal cancer, analyzes their clinical value, current challenges, and future development directions, and aims to provide a theoretical basis for individualized treatment decision-making in colorectal cancer.
文章引用:夏振涛, 李丁源, 谭宇扬, 张雅萍. 基于18F-FDG PET/CT影像组学预测结直肠癌微卫星不稳定状态的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(8): 756-762. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1682848

参考文献

[1] Xia, C., Dong, X., Li, H., Cao, M., Sun, D., He, S., et al. (2022) Cancer Statistics in China and United States, 2022: Profiles, Trends, and Determinants. Chinese Medical Journal, 135, 584-590.
https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000002108
[2] Cercek, A., Dos Santos Fernandes, G., Roxburgh, C.S., Ganesh, K., Ng, S., Sanchez-Vega, F., et al. (2020) Mismatch Repair-Deficient Rectal Cancer and Resistance to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Clinical Cancer Research, 26, 3271-3279.
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3728
[3] De Smedt, L., Lemahieu, J., Palmans, S., Govaere, O., Tousseyn, T., Van Cutsem, E., et al. (2015) Microsatellite Instable vs Stable Colon Carcinomas: Analysis of Tumour Heterogeneity, Inflammation and Angiogenesis. British Journal of Cancer, 113, 500-509.
https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.213
[4] 陈桥梁, 李响, 来瑞鹤, 等. 18F-FDGPET相关代谢参数预测结直肠癌微卫星高度不稳定性及HER2表达[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2025, 45(1): 7-12.
[5] 彭乐平, 张秀玲, 施柳言, 等. CT和MRI及影像组学预测结直肠癌微卫星不稳定状态研究进展[J]. 磁共振成像, 2024, 15(6): 218-223.
[6] Sinicrope, F.A. and Sargent, D.J. (2012) Molecular Pathways: Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer: Prognostic, Predictive, and Therapeutic Implications. Clinical Cancer Research, 18, 1506-1512.
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-1469
[7] 梁丽, 李鑫, 农琳, 等. 子宫内膜癌微卫星不稳定性分析: 微小微卫星变换的意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 254-261.
[8] 王申博, 康飞, 汪静. 多中心/多设备间PET影像组学特征可重复性的研究进展[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2025, 45(4): 246-249.
[9] 张宇, 王城, 常培叶. PET影像组学在结直肠癌诊疗中的应用进展[J]. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2025, 49(3): 191-196.
[10] Mi, M., Weng, S., Xu, Z., Hu, H., Wang, Y. and Yuan, Y. (2023) CSCO Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Version 2023: Updates and Insights. Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 35, 233-238.
https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.03.02
[11] 周志鹏, 赵春雷. PET影像组学临床应用进展[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2023, 31(4): 424-428.
[12] Cao, Y., Zhang, G., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Ren, J., Yan, X., et al. (2021) Predicting Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Cancer Based on Triphasic Enhanced Computed Tomography Radiomics Signatures: A Multicenter Study. Frontiers in Oncology, 11, Article 687771.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.687771
[13] Pei, Q., Yi, X., Chen, C., Pang, P., Fu, Y., Lei, G., et al. (2022) Pre-Treatment CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Cancer. European Radiology, 32, 714-724.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08167-3
[14] Ma, Y., Lin, C., Liu, S., Wei, Y., Ji, C., Shi, F., et al. (2022) Radiomics Features Based on Internal and Marginal Areas of the Tumor for the Preoperative Prediction of Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Cancer. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, Article 1020349.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1020349
[15] Hoshino, I., Yokota, H., Iwatate, Y., Mori, Y., Kuwayama, N., Ishige, F., et al. (2025) Prediction of the Differences in Tumor Mutation Burden between Primary and Metastatic Lesions by Radiogenomics. Cancer Science, 113, 229-239.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.15173
[16] Song, R., Feng, Q., Pei, E., Li, Z., Yuan, X., Huo, Y., et al. (2026) Subregional Radiomics Analysis on Multiparametric MRI for Evaluating Lymphovascular Invasion and Survival in Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 63, 1466-1479.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70236
[17] Chen, T., Yi, R., Liu, Z., Chen, Q., Yuan, W. and Zhou, Q. (2025) Integrative Multi-Region MRI Radiomics and Clinical Nomogram for Preoperative Lymphovascular Invasion Prediction in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Validation. BMC Medical Imaging, 26, Article No. 48.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-02105-1
[18] Bass, C., Ntelemis, F., Schmidt, J., Wolf, S., Geraldes, A., Mehrotra, D., et al. (2025) H&E-Based MSI/MMR Testing with AI in Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-Centred Blinded Evaluation. npj Digital Medicine, 9, Article No. 44.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02218-5
[19] Li, J., Yang, Z., Xin, B., Hao, Y., Wang, L., Song, S., et al. (2021) Quantitative Prediction of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer with Preoperative PET/CT-Based Radiomics. Frontiers in Oncology, 11, Article 702055.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.702055
[20] Liu, H., Ye, Z., Yang, T., Xie, H., Duan, T., Li, M., et al. (2021) Predictive Value of Metabolic Parameters Derived from 18F-FDG PET/CT for Microsatellite Instability in Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma. Frontiers in Immunology, 12, Article 724464.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.724464
[21] Zhang, J., Zhao, X., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., et al. (2020) Value of Pre-Therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics in Predicting EGFR Mutation Status in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 47, 1137-1146.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04592-1
[22] Giannini, V., Mazzetti, S., Bertotto, I., Chiarenza, C., Cauda, S., Delmastro, E., et al. (2019) Predicting Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy with 18F-FDG PET and MRI Radiomics Features. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 46, 878-888.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4250-6
[23] Zhao, H., Su, Y., Wang, Y., Lyu, Z., Xu, P., Gu, W., et al. (2024) Using Tumor Habitat-Derived Radiomic Analysis during Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET for Predicting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF Mutations in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Imaging, 24, Article No. 26.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00670-2
[24] Chen, S., Chiang, H., Chen, W.T., Hsieh, T., Yen, K., Chiang, S., et al. (2014) Correlation between PET/CT Parameters and KRAS Expression in Colorectal Cancer. Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 39, 685-689.
https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000000481