综合护理干预在脑出血患者中的应用效果研究
A Study on the Application Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
摘要: 目的:探讨综合护理干预在脑出血患者中的应用效果,为临床护理提供科学依据。方法:选取2023年1月至2024年6月我院神经外科收治的脑出血患者80例,采用随机数字表法分为综合护理组(n = 40)和常规护理组(n = 40)。常规护理组给予病情监测、基础护理及健康教育等常规护理措施,综合护理组在常规护理基础上实施病情监测、并发症预防、早期康复训练、心理护理及健康指导等综合护理干预。比较两组患者干预前后美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、Barthel指数、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分、并发症发生率及护理满意度。计量资料采用均数 ± 标准差( x ¯ ±s )表示,组间比较采用独立样本t检验,组内比较采用配对t检验;计数资料以率(%)表示,采用χ2检验,P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:干预后综合护理组GCS评分、Barthel指数显著高于常规护理组,NIHSS评分、mRS评分显著低于常规护理组(P < 0.05);综合护理组并发症总发生率为7.50% (3/40),显著低于常规护理组的25.00% (10/40) (P = 0.034);综合护理组护理总满意度为95.00% (38/40),显著高于常规护理组的80.00% (32/40) (P = 0.043)。结论:对脑出血患者实施系统化综合护理干预,可有效改善预后、减少并发症、促进功能恢复,具有较高的临床推广价值。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the application effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with cerebral hemorrhage, and to provide a scientific basis for clinical nursing. Methods: 80 patients with cerebral hemorrhage admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery from January 2023 to June 2024 were randomly divided into comprehensive nursing group (n = 40) and routine nursing group (n = 40). The routine nursing group received routine nursing measures, while the comprehensive nursing group received comprehensive nursing intervention on the basis of routine nursing. NIHSS score, Barthel Index, GCS score, mRS score, complication rate and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results: After intervention, GCS score and Barthel Index in the comprehensive nursing group were significantly higher than those in the routine nursing group, while NIHSS score and mRS score were significantly lower (P < 0.05). The total incidence of complications was 7.50% vs. 25.00% (P = 0.034), and nursing satisfaction was 95.00% vs. 80.00% (P = 0.043). Conclusion: Systematic comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively improve prognosis, reduce complications and promote functional recovery.
文章引用:王玉, 员玉芳. 综合护理干预在脑出血患者中的应用效果研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(8): 763-770. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1682849

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑出血诊治指南(2022) [J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2022, 55(8): 811-844.
[2] 李小寒, 尚少梅. 基础护理学[M]. 第7版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2022.
[3] 苏玲, 郭星, 李静, 等. 基于聚焦解决模式的心理干预在高血压脑出血患者围手术期护理中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2020, 26(24): 3316-3320.
[4] 顾彩萍, 倪志宏, 马颖君, 等. 综合护理措施对高血压脑出血患者实施微创手术的护理效果[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2015, 30(14): 1311-1312.
[5] 赵丽, 田媚, 辛红娟, 等. Snyder希望理论的护理干预对急性高血压性脑出血患者心理状态、生命质量及神经功能的影响[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2021, 37(2): 81-86.
[6] 丁亚云, 王伟民, 陈静. 心理护理在脑出血康复期患者中的应用效果[J]. 国际精神病学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 962-965.
[7] 印周敏. 神经内科综合护理干预对脑出血并发症发生率的影响[J]. 中国医学人文, 2024, 10(2): 130-132.
[8] 朱文英. 综合护理干预在微创术治疗高血压脑出血的应用效果[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2013, 32(8): 1771-1772.
[9] 苏玲, 郭星, 李静, 李香雪. 基于聚焦解决模式的心理干预在高血压脑出血患者围手术期护理中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2020, 26(24): 3316-3320.
[10] Zhang, L., Shen, T., Zhou, Y., Xie, X., Wang, J. and Gao, H. (2024) Multidisciplinary Management Based on Clinical Nursing Pathway Model for the Treatment of Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Medicine (Baltimore), 103, e37644.
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000037644
[11] Hong, Y., Yan, H., Wurichayihu, and Zhang, G.W. (2021) The Effects of Comprehensive Nursing Interventions on the Negative Emotions, Quality of Life, and Nursing Satisfaction in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients. American Journal of Translational Research, 13, 4860-4867.