老龄化社会老年群体经济参与的社会机制研究——基于社会资本与个体能动性的分析视角
Research on the Social Mechanisms of Economic Participation among the Elderly in an Aging Society—From the Perspective of Analysis on Social Capital and Individual Agency
摘要: 老年群体的经济参与是银发经济可持续发展的核心议题,其实现的社会机制尚未获得充分阐释。本文从老龄社会学视角出发,基于社会资本与个体能动性的分析框架,考察面向老年群体的赋能型服务活动影响其经济参与行为的内在机制。研究提出“个体能力发展”与“社会关系建构”双重路径:前者通过认知素养与信息处理能力的提升,扩展老年群体的消费选择范围并优化决策质量;后者通过社群互动构建高信任度的社会网络,降低银发市场的信息搜寻成本与交易信任成本。两类服务融合模式的比较分析印证了上述机制的现实解释力。研究表明,老年群体经济参与的主体条件与社会网络条件是银发经济从政策驱动转向内生增长的重要支撑。
Abstract: Economic participation among the elderly constitutes a central issue for the sustainable development of the silver economy, yet the social mechanisms underlying its realization remain inadequately elucidated. From an aging sociology perspective and within an analytical framework integrating social capital and individual agency, this study examines the intrinsic mechanisms through which empowerment-oriented services influence elderly economic participation. The research proposes two pathways: “individual capacity development” enhances cognitive literacy and information processing skills, thereby expanding consumption choices and improving decision-making quality; while “social network construction” fosters highly trustworthy community interactions, reducing information search costs and transactional trust barriers in the silver economy. A comparative analysis of these service integration models validates the explanatory power of these mechanisms. The findings demonstrate that the subjective conditions for elderly economic participation and robust social networks serve as critical foundations for transitioning the silver economy from policy-driven growth to endogenous development.
文章引用:余继梅. 老龄化社会老年群体经济参与的社会机制研究——基于社会资本与个体能动性的分析视角[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(8): 147-154. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.138538

参考文献

[1] 方正. 银发经济视角下老年教育参与对群体消费的影响——基于区域老年人调查的实证研究[J]. 宁波开放大学学报, 2026, 24(1): 7-13+18.
[2] 章平, 吴琼. 银发经济增进老年人福祉的理论机制与实践路径[J]. 特区实践与理论, 2026(1): 82-89.
[3] 杨红娟. 银发族消费升级: 特征事实、驱动机制与实现路径[J]. 商业经济研究, 2024(5): 55-58.
[4] 张喆, 张卓, 连婷. 人口老龄化、社会保障与消费增长——基于城乡差异视角[J]. 商业经济研究, 2024(9): 61-64.
[5] Zheng, Q., Liu, Y. and Zhang, H. (2024) A Systematic Literature Review on Aging and Consumer Behavior: Insights from the TCM-ADO Framework. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article No. 1458.
[6] 张鑫宇, 赵颖智. 数字素养与家庭消费结构升级——基于CFPS数据的实证分析[J]. 人口研究, 2025, 49(2): 97-113.
[7] 刘洋洋, 李建新. 数字鸿沟还是数字机遇?——互联网使用对老年消费的影响[J]. 人口研究, 2025, 49(2): 114-128.
[8] 于志国, 关睿骞, 李同军, 等. “互联网+1+4”线下线上融合模式推进老年人身心健康教育的研究[J]. 成人教育, 2021, 41(12): 45-48.
[9] 苏志钢, 白澄宇, 李晓林, 等. 中国银发经济可持续发展路径探索[J]. 可持续发展经济导刊, 2024(12): 38-41.
[10] 阳义南. 银发经济的主要特征与发展策略[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2026(2): 99-105.
[11] 胡惠琴. WHO“积极老龄化”政策框架的新解读[J]. 城乡规划, 2020(3): 43-49.
[12] 高传胜. 延迟退休背景下老龄政策建设, 何以可为?——基于积极老龄化政策框架三个维度的探讨[J]. 阅江学刊, 2024, 16(5): 149-161.
[13] Zheng, Z., Omar Zaki, H., Tan, Q.L., et al. (2024) Impact of Aging on Consumer Behavior: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48, e70000.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70000
[14] 马嘉蕾, 高传胜. 社区嵌入式养老服务模式的发展逻辑与实践隐忧——基于“动因-资源”分析框架的案例研究[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 41(1): 110-118.