算力成本约束下电子商务发展逻辑的重构与应对路径研究
A Study on the Reconstruction of the Development Logic and Response Strategies for E-Commerce under Computing Cost Constraints
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.158895, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 向欣然*, 赵敬华, 毛迪菲, 郭 琪:上海理工大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 电子商务算力成本发展逻辑E-Commerce Computing Costs Development Logic
摘要: 随着生成式人工智能、智能推荐、数字人直播等技术在电子商务领域的深度应用,算力已由后台支撑资源转变为影响行业运行与竞争格局的重要生产要素。本文旨在探讨算力成本约束如何重构电子商务的发展逻辑。研究认为,算力成本不仅包括基础设施投入、云服务调用和能源消耗,还涉及运维维护与组织适配等综合性支出,其上升正在推动电商行业的竞争重点由流量扩张和资本投入转向算力效率与基础设施能力。基于成本收益分析与平台双边市场理论,本文构建了“算力成本–经营行为–竞争格局”的分析框架。研究发现,算力成本在提升平台匹配效率和商家运营能力的同时,也可能通过技术服务收费、规则设计和服务分层等方式在平台、商家与消费者之间重新分配,进而改变行业竞争方式与生态结构。这一过程可能带来中小商家转型门槛上升、平台技术锁定与成本转嫁、以及能耗与绿色发展压力等现实风险。基于此,本文从构建共享型算力服务体系、发展绿色算力与节能基础设施、提升中小商家数字化适应能力三个方面提出应对建议。研究表明,在智能化趋势不断深化的背景下,电子商务行业需要在效率提升、成本控制与普惠发展之间寻求新的平衡。
Abstract: With the widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence, intelligent recommendation systems, and digital human live streaming in the e-commerce sector, computing power has evolved from a back-end support resource into a key productive factor shaping industry operations and competition. This paper aims to examine how computing cost constraints are restructuring the development logic of e-commerce. The study argues that computing costs are not limited to infrastructure investment, cloud service usage, and energy consumption, but also include operation, maintenance, and organisational adaptation. The rise in such costs is shifting the competitive focus of the e-commerce industry from traffic expansion and capital investment to computing efficiency and infrastructure capability. Based on cost-benefit analysis and two-sided market theory, this paper constructs an analytical framework of “computing costs-business behaviour-competitive landscape”. The findings show that while computing costs can improve platform matching efficiency and merchant operational capability, they may also be redistributed among platforms, merchants, and consumers through technical service charges, platform rules, and tiered services, thereby reshaping market competition and ecosystem structure. This process may lead to practical risks such as higher transformation barriers for small and medium-sized merchants, stronger platform lock-in and cost pass-through, as well as growing pressure from energy consumption and green development. Accordingly, this paper proposes three policy responses: building a shared computing service system, developing green computing power and energy-saving infrastructure, and improving the digital adaptability of small and medium-sized merchants. The study suggests that, as intelligent transformation continues to deepen, the e-commerce industry needs to seek a new balance between efficiency improvement, cost control, and inclusive development.
文章引用:向欣然, 赵敬华, 毛迪菲, 郭琪. 算力成本约束下电子商务发展逻辑的重构与应对路径研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(8): 451-459. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.158895

参考文献

[1] 李土金. 人工智能引领电子商务产业智能化转型与升级探究[J]. 国际商务财会, 2025(21): 70-73, 77.
[2] 李志伟. 数字经济背景下互联网金融高质量发展研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海财经大学, 2021.
[3] 孙毅, 陈恺, 郑顺林, 等. 基于算力-能量全分布式在线共享的5G网络负荷管理策略[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2024, 52(9): 154-165.
[4] 黄湘闽, 陈方栋. “人工智能+”赋能人力资源开发利用: 机制创新与效率提升[J]. 人力资源服务, 2026(1): 45-48.
[5] 余涛. 数字新质生产力驱动下企业成本核算重塑逻辑与实现路径[J]. 财会通讯, 2026(2): 18-24.
[6] 李文卿. 论算力基建的数字环境治理悖论及其破解——技术反弹效应下的法治进路探索[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2025(10): 143-151.
[7] 张晓芳. 基于云计算服务的协作学习教学实践研究——以龙芯教材为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2013.
[8] 林嘉瑜, 韩俊涛, 王永真, 等. 计及(火用)效率的低碳数据中心算力综合能源系统规划及运行优化[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2025, 59(9): 1327-1337.
[9] 陈浦秋杭, 史普润, 陈清华. 数字经济时代平台型企业市场力量的来源和标志研究[J]. 学习与探索, 2024(8): 136-142.
[10] 陈曙光. 国内电商店铺流量困局的破解之道[J]. 中国电子商务, 2024(23): 37-40.
[11] 王伟懿. 中国新媒体电商行业竞争格局演变及未来趋势探究[J]. 西部广播电视, 2025, 46(10): 100-103, 111.
[12] 丁巧宜, 王梓耀, 潘振宁, 等. 面向电量-调频-容量市场的数据中心园区算力及电力资源规划[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48(1): 59-66.
[13] 郭晗, 王晨阳. 数据资产化、算力资源配置与企业创新——基于TOE框架的实证研究[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2025, 41(11): 18-34.
[14] 陈思宇, 孙勇, 荆江平, 等. 基于安全访问能力框架的配电网分层算力网络协同调度关键技术研究[J]. 自动化与仪器仪表, 2025(1): 232-236, 241.
[15] Rochet, J. and Tirole, J. (2006) Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 645-667.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
[16] Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C. (1985) Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. American Economic Review, 75, 424-440.